최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기한국도서관 정보학회지 = Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, v.52 no.2, 2021년, pp.25 - 44
In a situation where OA papers are increasing, POI, which indexes how open the research activities of individual researchers are, is drawing attention. This study investigated the existence of OA papers and the OA method published in international academic journals by domestic LIS researchers, and d...
Cho, Jane (2020). Analysis of open access status of domestic author's papers published in international journals: based on highly cited papers. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 54(1), 325-341.
Chung, Kyoung Hee, Lee, Jae Yun, Chung, Eunkyung, & Choi, Sanghee (2020). A study on methods of implementation for the NRF open access policy. Korea Society for Information Management, 37(4), 225-286.
Fujiko, U. (2019). Repository registration linked to faculty evaluation: OA rate adoption and its effects. 2nd SPARC Japan Seminar. Available: https://www.nii.ac.jp/sparc/event/2019/pdf/20191220_doc4.pdf
Kim, Gyuhwan (2020). A study on the possibility of open access to international journal articles: based on articles cited in the Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management. Korea Society for Information Management, 37(4), 207-223.
Kim, Gyuhwan & Chung, Kyoung Hee (2017). Characteristics of open access journals in Korea: focused on KCI journals. Korea Society for Information Management, 34(3), 251-267.
Kim, Hwanmin (2019). Open access transformation model and case for subscribed journals. The 2nd KESLI Open Knowledge Seminar 2019. Seoul: Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information.
Na, Hyeran (2020). Electronic journal subscription and open access publication. Seoul National University Library Report, 142, 14-23.
National Library of Korea (2016). A study on countermeasures to changes in the global open access environment. Available: https://http://nl.go.kr/upload/nl/commu/2017/5/14955272397000.pdf
Akbaritabar, A. & Stahlschmidt, S. (2019). Merits and limits: applying open data to monitor open access publications in bibliometric databases. 17th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, ISSI 2019, 2 September 2019 through 5 September 2019, Sapienza University of RomeRome: Italy.
ARL (2019). Comment: ARL Feedback on Plan S Open Access Implementation Guidelines. Available: https://www.arl.org/news/arl-news/4720-arl-comments-on-plan-s-open-access-implementation
Clarivate (2021). Open access. Available: https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/solutions/open-access/
Efficiency and Standards for Article Charges (2021). Available: https://esac-initiative.org/about/transformative-agreements/agreement-registry/
Enserink, M. (2018). European science funders ban grantees from publishing in paywalled journals. Science. Available: https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/09/european-science-fundersban-grantees-publishing-paywalled-journals
IARLA (2019). A View of Plan S. Available: https://iarla.org/2019/10/a-view-of-plan-s/
Martin-Martin, A., Costas, R., Leeuwen, V., & Lopez-Cozar, E. D. (2018). Evidence of open access of scientific publications in Google Scholar: a large-scale analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 12(3), 819-841.
Mercer, H. (2011). Almost halfway there: an analysis of the open access behaviors of academic librarians. College & Research Libraries, 72(5), 443-453.
MIT Libraries (2019). Harvard Library and MIT Libraries Provide Recommendations for PlanS Implementation. Available: https://libraries.mit.edu/news/harvard-library/29052/
Nichols, D. M. & Twidale, M. B. (2017). Metrics for openness. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(4), 1048-1060.
Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (2020). OASPA members' output continues to grow, as does the use of CC BY licenses. Available: https://oaspa.org/oaspa-members-output-continues-to-grow-as-does-the-use-of-cc-by-licenses/
Peekhaus, W. (2021). A cohort study of how faculty in LIS schools perceive and engage with open-access publishing. Journal of Information Science, 47(1), 16-28.
Piwowar, H., Priem, J., Lariviere, V., Alperin, J. P., Matthias, L., Norlander, B., Farley, A., West, J., & Haustein, S. (2018). The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of open access articles. PeerJ, 6, e4375.
Robinson-Garcia, N., Costas, R., & Leeuwen, T. N. (2020). Open access uptake by universities worldwide. PeerJ, 8, e9410. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9410
Schultz, T. A. (2017). Opening up communication: assessing open access practices in the communication studies discipline. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 5(1), p.eP2131. http://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2131
SCOPUS (2020). Scopus filters for Open Access type and 5.5 million more OA articles (17 million in total!). Available: https://blog.scopus.com/posts/scopus-filters-for-open-access-type-and-55-million-more-oa-articles-17-million-in-total
Severin, A., Egger, M., Eve, M. P., & Hurlimann, D. (2020). Discipline-specific open access publishing practices and barriers to change: an evidence-based review [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research, 7, 1925. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.17328.2
Wang, X., Cui, Y., Xu, S., & Hu, Z. (2018). The state and evolution of Gold open access: a country and discipline level analysis. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 70(5), 573-584. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-02-2018-0023
Way, D. (2010). The open access availability of library and information science literature. College & Research Libraries, 71(4), 302-309.
Xia, J., Wilhoite, S. K., & Myers, R. L. (2011). A librarian-LIS faculty divide in open access practices. Journal of Documentation, 67(5), 791-805.
上原 藤子 (2019). ?員評?とリンクするリポジトリ登? - OA 率採用とその?果. 第2回 SPARC Japan セミナ. 출처: https://www.nii.ac.jp/sparc/event/2019/pdf/20191220_doc4.pdf
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
출판사/학술단체 등이 한시적으로 특별한 프로모션 또는 일정기간 경과 후 접근을 허용하여, 출판사/학술단체 등의 사이트에서 이용 가능한 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.