간호대학생의 Virtual 시뮬레이션 실습 및 High fidelity 시뮬레이션 실습교육 경험 분석: 혼합연구방법 적용 Analysis of the virtual simulation practice and high fidelity simulation practice training experience of nursing students: A mixed-methods study원문보기
Purpose: This study used an exploratory sequential approach (mixed methods) design to explore essential meaning through comparing and analyzing the experiences of nursing students in virtual simulation practice and high fidelity simulation practice education in parallel. Methods: The study participa...
Purpose: This study used an exploratory sequential approach (mixed methods) design to explore essential meaning through comparing and analyzing the experiences of nursing students in virtual simulation practice and high fidelity simulation practice education in parallel. Methods: The study participants were 20 nursing students, and data were collected through focus group meetings from July 17 to August 5, 2020, and via online quantitative data from November 10 to November 15, 2020. The qualitative data were analyzed using Giorgi's phenomenological method, and the quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, the Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis H test analysis of variance and Spearman's ρ correlation. Results: The comparison between the two simulation training experiences was shown in five contextual structures, as follows: (1) reflection of the clinical field, (2) thinking theorem vs. thinking expansion, (3) individual-centered learning vs. team-centered learning, (4) attitudes toward participating in practical training, (5) metacognition of personal competency as a prospective nurse, and (6) revisiting the method of practice training. There was a positive correlation between satisfaction with the practice and the clinical judgment ability of high fidelity simulation, which was statistically significant (r=.47, p=.036). Conclusion: Comparing the experiences between virtual simulation practice training and high fidelity simulation practice training, which has increased in demand due to the Coronavirus Disease-2019 pandemic, is meaningful as it provides practical data for introspection and reflection on in-campus clinical education.
Purpose: This study used an exploratory sequential approach (mixed methods) design to explore essential meaning through comparing and analyzing the experiences of nursing students in virtual simulation practice and high fidelity simulation practice education in parallel. Methods: The study participants were 20 nursing students, and data were collected through focus group meetings from July 17 to August 5, 2020, and via online quantitative data from November 10 to November 15, 2020. The qualitative data were analyzed using Giorgi's phenomenological method, and the quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, the Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis H test analysis of variance and Spearman's ρ correlation. Results: The comparison between the two simulation training experiences was shown in five contextual structures, as follows: (1) reflection of the clinical field, (2) thinking theorem vs. thinking expansion, (3) individual-centered learning vs. team-centered learning, (4) attitudes toward participating in practical training, (5) metacognition of personal competency as a prospective nurse, and (6) revisiting the method of practice training. There was a positive correlation between satisfaction with the practice and the clinical judgment ability of high fidelity simulation, which was statistically significant (r=.47, p=.036). Conclusion: Comparing the experiences between virtual simulation practice training and high fidelity simulation practice training, which has increased in demand due to the Coronavirus Disease-2019 pandemic, is meaningful as it provides practical data for introspection and reflection on in-campus clinical education.
Hwang GA. National curriculum framework for post-COVID education. The Journal of Curriculum Studies. 2020;38(4):83-106.
Cho MH, Kwon IS. A study on the clinical practice experiences on nursing activities of nursing students. The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education. 2007;13(2):143-154.
Siassakos D, Draycott T, O'Brien K, Kenyon C, Bartlett C, Fox R. Exploratory randomized controlled trial of hybrid obstetric simulation training for undergraduate students. Simulation in Healthcare: Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare. 2010;5(4):193-198. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0b013e3181d3ee0b
Kim J-H, Park I-H, Shin S. Systematic review of Korean studies on simulation within nursing education. The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education. 2013;19(3):307-319. https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2013.19.3.307
Fawaz MA, Hamdan-Mansour AM. Impact of high-fidelity simulation on the development of clinical judgment and motivation among Lebanese nursing students. Nurse Education Today. 2016;46:36-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.08.026
Cant RP, Cooper SJ. Simulation in the Internet age: The place of web-based simulation in nursing education. An integrative review. Nurse Education Today. 2014;34(12):1435-1442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2014.08.001
Cook DA, Erwin PJ, Triola MM. Computerized virtual patients in health professions education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Academic Medicine. 2010;85(10):1589-1602. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181edfe13
Kang H-Y, Choi E-Y, Kim H-R. Nursing student's experiences in team based simulation learning. The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education. 2013;19(1):5-15. https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2013.19.1.5
Kim YJ, Kim WJ, Min HY. Nursing students' experiences in virtual simulation practice. The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education. 2020;26(2):198-207. https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2020.26.2.198
Kim M, Kim S, Lee WS. Effects of a virtual reality simulation and a blended simulation of care for pediatric patient with asthma. Child Health Nursing Research. 2019;25(4):496-506. https://doi.org/10.4094/chnr.2019.25.4.496
Wotton K, Davis J, Button D, Kelton M. Third-year undergraduate nursing students' perceptions of high-fidelity simulation. The Journal of Nursing Education. 2010;49(11):632-639. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20100831-01
Lee SJ, Park YM, Noh SM. The effects of simulation training with hybrid model for nursing students on nursing performance ability and self confidence. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing. 2013;25(2):170-182. https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2013.25.2.170
Shim K, Shin H. The reliability and validity of the lasater clinical judgement rubric in Korean nursing students. Child Health Nursing Research. 2015;21(2):160-167. https://doi.org/10.4094/chnr.2015.21.2.160
Giorgi A. Phenomenology and psychological research. Pittsburgh PA: Duquesne university press; 1985. p. 1-216.
Schwandt AT, Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Judging interpretations: But is it rigorous? trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation. 2007;114:11-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.223
Lasater K. High-fidelity simulation and the development of clinical judgment: Students' experiences. Journal of Nursing Education. 2007;46(6):269-276. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20070601-06
Asghar A. Reciprocal peer coaching and its use as a formative assessment strategy for first-year students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2010;35(4):403-417. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930902862834
Kim SH, Ham YS. A meta-analysis of the effect of simulation based education-Korean nurses and nursing students. The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education. 2015;21(3):308-319. https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2015.21.3.308
Issenberg S, William C, Emil R, David L, Ross J. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: A BEME systematic review. Medical Teacher. 2005;27(1):10-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590500046924
Levett J, Lapkin S. A systematic review of the effectiveness of simulation debriefing in health professional education. Nurse Education Today. 2014;34(6):58-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.09.020
Han SS, Kim MH, Yung EK. Factors affecting nursing professionalism. The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education. 2008;14(1):73-79. https://doi.org/10.5977/JKASNE.2008.14.1.073
Yeun EJ, Kwon YM, Ahn OH. Development of a nursing professional values scale. The Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2005;35(6):1091-1100.
Kim CH, Kim JY. Influence of nursing students' clinical practice learning environment, self-leadership, and clinical practice belonging on nursing professionalism. The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education. 2019;5(1):5-16. https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2019.25.1.5
Lee EK, Ji EJ. Factors influencing nursing professionalism in nursing students: Clinical learning environment and attitude toward nurse-physician collaboration. Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing. 2016;23(2):126-135. https://doi.org/10.7739/jkafn.2016.23.2.126
Bunkenborg G, Samuelson K, Akeson J, Poulson I. Impact of professionalism in nursing on in-hospital bedside monitoring practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2013;69(7):1466-1477. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12003
Kim KA, Choi DW. The effect of virtual simulation in nursing education: An application of care for acute heart disease patients. Journal of Korean Society for Simulation in Nursing. 2018;6(2):1-13. https://doi.org/10.17333/JKSSN.2018.6.2.1
Chu MS, Hwang YY. Effects of web-based simulation and high-fidelity simulation of acute heart disease patient care. The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education. 2017;23(1):95-107. https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2017.23.1.95
Kim SK, Eom MR, Park MH. Effects of nursing education using virtual reality: A systematic review. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association. 2019;19(2):661-670. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2019.19.02.661
AI-Helper
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.