참고문헌 (76)

1. Altay, M., & Akar, S. (2014). Pre-service elementary mathematics teachers' views on model-eliciting. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 345-349. 

   상세보기

2. Arshad, A., Halim, L., & Nasri, N. (2021). Impact of integrating science and engineering teaching approach on students achievement: A meta analysis. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(2), 159-170. 

   상세보기

3. Chamberlin, S., & Moon, S. (2005). Model-eliciting activities as a tool to develop and identify creatively gifted mathematicians. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17(1), 37-47. 

   상세보기

4. Chi, M., Slotta, J., & de Leeuw, N. (1994). From things to process: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. Learning and Instruction, 4, 27-43. 

   상세보기

5. Choi, S. (2009). Teacher's curriculum development based on students' preconception: Focusing on application of the cognitive conflict process model to electricity unit in elementary school science curriculum. (Master's thesis). Ewha Womans University Graduate School, Seoul. 

6. Cunningham, C., Lachapelle, C., Brennan, R., Kelly, G., Tunis, C., & Gentry, C. (2020). The impact of engineering curriculum design principles on elementary students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(3), 423-453. 

   상세보기

7. Edelson, D. (2001). Learning-for-use: A framework for the design of technology-supported inquiry activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 355-385. 

   상세보기

8. Gomez-Zwiep, S. (2008). Elementary teachers' understanding of students' science misconceptions: Implications for practice and teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19(5), 437-454. 

   상세보기

9. Guzey, S., & Jung, J. (2021). Productive thinking and science learning in design teams. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(2), 215-232. 

   상세보기

10. Ha, S., & Lee, K. (2015). Hermeneutics and science education: Focus on implications for conceptual change theory. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(1), 85-94. 

    원문보기 상세보기

11. Hake, R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64-74. 

    상세보기

12. Hong, H., Kim, J., Choi, B., & Lee, J. (2012). Conceptual understanding process for electric circuit of elementary science-gifted students using dynamic science assessment. The Korean Society for the Gifted, 22(3), 703-728. 

13. Huh, M., Nam, S., & Lee, J. (2021). Meta-analysis on the effect of elementary invention education. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 27(1), 99-118. 

    상세보기

14. Im, J., Lee, S., & Yang, I. (2010). Analysis of elementary school teachers' laboratory instruction process through experiments from science laboratory and engineering laboratory. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 29(4), 515-525. 

15. Kang, E., & Kim, J. (2020). The effects of experimental activity with computing thinking expression on elementary school students' scientific models. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 70(7), 595-602. 

    상세보기

16. Kang, E., & Kim, J. (2021). Development of experimental guide materials for algorithmic expression-Focusing on magnetic properties experiment. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 40(3), 326-342. 

    원문보기 상세보기

17. Khan, M., & Khan, S. (2011). Data and information visualization methods, and interactive mechanisms: A survey. International Journal of Computer Applications, 34(1), 1-14. 

    

18. Kim, H. (2007). Development and verification of the invention education model applied with TRIZ techniques. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 20(1), 61-84. 

19. Kim, H. (2020). The effect of 'gravitational acceleration measuring device' inventing education program using arduino's various sensors on science-gifted elementary school students' creative problem solving and attitude towards science. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 20(17), 1101-1122. 

    상세보기

20. Kim, J., & Moon, S. (2009). Development of practical arts education program for the improvement of elementary school children's interest in the invention using TRIZ method. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 22(1), 93-114. 

21. Kim, M., Kim, D., & Park, J. (2018). Meta-analysis of educational effects in invention education programs. School Science Journal, 12(1), 139-150. 

    

22. Korea Invention Promotion Association (2014). Interesting story of Dr. Tongtong's invention using the TRIZ technique. Korea Invention Promotion Association, Korean Intellectual Property Office. 

23. Korean Intellectual Property Office (2017). Act on the activation and support of invention education(Enacted on March 14, 2017, Act No. 14590). 

24. Krajcik, J., McNeill, K., & Reiser, B. (2008). Learning-goals-driven design model: Developing curriculum materials that align with national standards and incorporate project-based pedagogy. Science Education, 92(1), 1-32. 

    상세보기

25. Kwon, H., & Park, K. (2009). Engineering design: A facilitator for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education, Journal of Science Education, 33, 207-219. 

    

26. Kwon, H., Lee E., & Lee, D. (2016). Meta-analysis on the effectiveness of invention education in South Korea: Creativity, attitude, and tendency for problem solving. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(1), 48-57. 

    상세보기

27. Kwon, J. (1992). How to diagnose for children's misconception of science? Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 11(2), 173-180. 

28. Lee, B., Shim, K., & Kim, H. (2017). Perception of science educators about invention education in science education. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(1), 17-24. 

    원문보기 상세보기

29. Lee, C. (2013). Analysis of contents related to the invention in elementary school textbooks according to the 2007 revised curriculum. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 19(3), 23-43. 

    상세보기

30. Lee, H., & Nam, Y. (2019). Development and application of engineering based engineering.science integrated program for teaching the concept of 'light' and 'sound'. School Science Journal, 13(3), 211-224. 

    

31. Lee, H., Kim, A., & Hong, Y. (2010). 'My creative thermometer' program for the gifted in elementary science. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 14(3), 453-467. 

    상세보기

32. Lee, H., Kwon, H., Park, G., & Oh, H. (2014). Development and application of integrative STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) education model based on scientific inquiry. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(2), 63-78. 

    원문보기 상세보기

33. Lee, J., & Choi, Y. (2010). The development and application effect of IDEAL-TRIZ learning program to improve technological problem-solving capability for elementary school students. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 23(2), 213-233. 

34. Lee, K., Lew, K., & Han, Y. (2016). The effect of DHA-I program based on TRIZ to improve creativity and confluence problem solving ability of lower grade elementary school children. The Journal of Creativity Education, 16(3), 97-111. 

35. Lee, M., & Jeon, J. (2020). Recognition and education needs of the invention education of elementary school teachers. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 26(3), 87-118. 

    상세보기

36. Lee, Y., & Park, J. (2012). Pedagogical methodology of teaching activity-based flow chart for elementary school students. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education, 16(4), 489-501. 

37. Lesh, R., Hoover, M., Hole, B., Kelly, A., & Post, T. (2000). Principles for developing thought-revealing activities for students and teachers. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 591-646). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 

38. Lewis, T. (2006). Design and inquiry: Bases for an accommodation between science and technology education in the curriculum. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(3), 255-281. 

    상세보기

39. Lohse, G., Biolsi, K., Walker, N., & Rueter, H. (1994). A classification of visual representations. Communications of the ACM, 37(12), 36-50. 

    상세보기

40. Lou, S., Shih, R., Tseng, K., Diez, C., & Tsai, H. (2010). How to promote knowledge transfer through a problem-based learning internet platform for vocational high school students. European Journal of Engineering Education, 35(5), 539-551. 

    상세보기

41. McLure, F., Won, M., & Treagust, D. F. (2020). A sustained multidimensional conceptual change intervention in grade 9 and 10 science classes. International Journal of Science Education, 42(5), 703-721. 

    상세보기

42. Ministry of Education [MOE]. (2015a). National practical course/computer and information curriculum No. 2015-74. 

43. Ministry of Education [MOE]. (2015b). National science curriculum No. 2015-74. 

44. Moon, S., & Kim, O. (2011). The development of an invention education program using the wise life textbook for children's creativity. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 15(2), 333-351. 

    상세보기

45. Moore, T. (2008). Model-eliciting activities: A case-based approach for getting students interested in material science and engineering. Journal of Materials Education, 30(5-6), 295-310. 

46. Mun, K., Hwang, Y., & Yang, D. (2020). Development of science-art integrated program and exploration of conceptual understanding: Focused on light concept for elementary school students. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 24(3), 319-328. 

    

47. Nesmith, S., & Cooper, S. (2021). Connecting engineering design and inquiry cycles: Impact on elementary preservice teachers' engineering efficacy and perspectives toward teaching engineering. School Science and Mathematics, 121(5), 251-262. 

    상세보기

48. NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. Washington DC: The National Academies Press. 

49. Noh, J., Son, J. Jeon, J. Song, J., & Kim, J. (2019). The effects of step-by-step question-based unit design on elementary school students' understanding of 'seasonal change' concept. Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 12(2), 151-164. 

50. Park, J. (2012). A survey of elementary-students' concepts about electric circuits. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 62(8), 848-855. 

    상세보기

51. Park, K., & Park, H. (2018). Analysis of research trend on conceptual change in earth science. The Korean Earth Science Society, 39(2), 193-207. 

    원문보기 상세보기

52. Park, S., & Kim, Y. (2006). Current status and strategy for development of invention education in elementary school-Based at science, practical art and arts subjects. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 19(1), 132-133. 

53. Park, W., & Park, I. (2015). Development of an elementary invention program on the basis of fabricating activity for a simple gravimeter and its application to science classes. Korean Journal of Elementary Education, 26(1), 175-186. 

    

54. Pintrich, P., Marx, R., & Boyle, R. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational research, 63(2), 167-199. 

    상세보기

55. Posner, G., Strike, K., Hewson, P., & Gertzog, W. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Towards a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211-277. 

    상세보기

56. Radloff, J., & Capobianco, B. (2021). Investigating elementary teachers' tensions and mitigating strategies related to integrating engineering design-based science instruction. Research in Science Education, 51(1), 213-232. 

    상세보기

57. Reddy, M., & Panacharoensawad, B. (2017). Students problem-solving difficulties and implications in physics: An empirical study on influencing factors. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(14), 59-62. 

58. Roth, W. (2001). Learning science through technological design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 768-790. 

    상세보기

59. Rubaitun, R. (2018). Implementation of model-eliciting activities to improve the ability of mathematical problem-solving. Journal of Innovative Mathematics Learning, 1(3), 312-317. 

    

60. Seidman, I. (2009). Interviewing as a qualitative research. NY: Teacgers College Press. 

61. Self, B., Miller, R., Kean, A., Moore, T., Ogletree, T., & Schreiber, F. (2008). Important student misconceptions in mechanics and thermal science: Identification using model-eliciting activities. 38th ASEE/IEEE Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Frontiers in Education Conference. 

62. Seo, S., Jin, S., Jeong, S., & Kwon, J. (2002). Elementary students' cognitive conflict through discussion and physical experience in learning of electric circuit. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 22(4), 862-871. 

63. Shipstone, D. (1988). Pupils' understanding of simple electrical circuits. Some implications for instruction. Physics Education, 23(2), 92. 

    상세보기

64. Smith, J., Disessa, A., & Roschelle, J. (1994). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(2), 115-163. 

    상세보기

65. Smith, K., & Burghardt, D. (2007). Teaching engineering at the K-12 level: Two perspectives. The Technology Teacher, 66(7), 20-24. 

    상세보기

66. Song, J. (2003). Constructivist science education and the map of students' physics misconceptions. The Mathematical Education, 42(2), 87-109. 

67. Son, J., & Kim, J. (2015). Effects of diagnostic and formative assessment using equivalent test on elementary science classes: Focused on the 'earth and moon' unit. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(4), 619-628. 

    원문보기 상세보기

68. Son, J., & Lee, B. (2017). Analysis of relevance of Korean and foreign science curricula and invention. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(4), 651-658. 

    원문보기 상세보기

69. Song, J., Kang, S., Kwak, Y., Kim, D., Kim, S., Na, J., Do, J., Min, B., Park, S., Bae, S., Son, Y., Son, J., Oh, P., Lee, J., Lee, H., Iim, H., Jeong, D., Jong, J., Kim, J., & Joung, Y. (2019). Contents and features of 'Korean Science Education Standards (KSES)' for the next generation. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 39(3), 465-478. 

    원문보기 상세보기

70. Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills-Learning for life in our times. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 

71. Tsai, C. (2003). Using a conflict map and an instructional tool to change student alternative conceptions in simple series electric-circuits. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 307-327. 

    상세보기

72. Vidic, N., Ozaltin, N., Besterfield-Sacre, M., & Shuman, L. (2014). Model eliciting activities motivated problem solving process: Solution path analysis. American Society for Engineering Education, 24.911.1-24.911.19. 

73. Wulandari, A. (2018). Correlation between critical thinking and conceptual understanding of student's learning outcome in mechanics concept. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2014, No. 1, p. 020028). AIP Publishing LLC. 

74. Wulandari, A., Agustina, N., Hidayati, Y., & Tsulutsya, F. (2019). Increasing students' problem-solving ability on the pressure concept through model-eliciting activities(MEAs). In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2202, No. 1, p. 020058). AIP Publishing LLC. 

75. Yoon, J., Han, K., & Nam, Y. (2019). An analysis of the characteristics of elementary science gifted students' problem solving through model eliciting activity(MEA). Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 12(1), 64-81. 

    원문보기 상세보기

76. Yu, G., Jeong, J., Kim, Y., & Kim, H. (2018). Qualitative research methods. Seoul: Pakyoungsa.