[논문]가상현실 기반 국방 교육훈련체계 사업화 우선순위 선정에 관한 연구

이세호; 한승조

doi:10.14400/jdc.2022.20.3.201

가상현실 기반 국방 교육훈련체계 사업화 우선순위 선정에 관한 연구
(A) Study on the Priority Selection for business development of the Defense Education and Training System Based on Virtual Reality 원문보기

디지털융복합연구 = Journal of digital convergence, v.20 no.3, 2022년, pp.201 - 209

초록
AI-Helper

군(軍)이 가상현실 기술을 다양한 교육훈련체계에 도입을 검토하여 충분히 활용하기 위해서는 해당 기술 및 교육체계의 특성을 반영하는 사업화 특성에 대한 정확한 파악과 선별적인 적용이 중요할 것이다. 본 연구에서는 가상현실 기반의 교육훈련체계 사업화 시 고려해야 할 요인들에 대해서 AHP(Analitic Hierarchy Process)기법을 통해 평가기준을 선정하고 추진 과제들의 우선순위를 판단해보았다. 선행연구를 기초로 초기 AHP 모델을 구성하여 레벨 1의 평가 기준으로 현실성 등 6개 요소에 대한 상대적인 중요도를 분석하였다. 다음으로 레벨 2는 6개의 평가 기준에 11개 과제별 중요도의 확인을 위해 각각의 평가 기준을 대상으로 분석하여 과제별 우선순위를 선정하였다. 분석결과 레벨 1에서는 현실성 및 파급성이 다른 요소에 비해 높은 중요도를 나타내었다. 최종 상대적 중요도를 평가한 결과는 ① 비행훈련, ② 재난훈련, ③ 포탄 사격, ④ 차량 운전 순으로 우선순위가 나타났다. 본 연구에서 제시한 모델의 레벨 1과 2에서 결정된 상대적 우선순위를 바탕으로 국방 가상현실 과제 연구 우선순위의 최종 의사결정에 필요한 사업별 중요도를 제시하였다. 본 연구를 통해 국방 분야의 교육훈련체계 사업화에 대한 우선순위 선정에 참고자료로 활용될 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

In order for the military to review the introduction of virtual reality technology into various education and training systems and fully utilize it, it is important to reflect the characteristics of the technology and education system and to accurately identify and selectively apply the characteristics of commercialization. In this study, the evaluation criteria were selected through the Analitic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method for factors to be considered when commercializing a virtual reality-based education and training system, and the priorities of the projects were determined. Based on previous studies, an initial AHP model was constructed and the relative importance of six factors, including reality, was analyzed as the level 1 evaluation criteria. Next, for Level 2, each evaluation criterion was evaluated to confirm the importance of each of the 11 tasks in the six evaluation criteria, and priorities were selected for each task. As a result of the analysis, level 1 showed that reality and ripple had higher importance than other factors. As a result of evaluating the final relative importance, the priority was shown in the order of ① flight training, ② disaster training, ③ shooting Training, and ④ driving a vehicle. Based on the relative priorities determined in Levels 1 and 2 of the model presented in this study, the importance of each project necessary for final decision-making of the research priorities for the defense virtual reality project was presented. It is expected that this study can be used as a reference material for prioritizing the commercialization of education and training systems in the defense sector.

주제어

표/그림 (7)

그림 Fig. 1. XR Industrial site usage prospect
표 Table 1. Defense Virtual Reality Related Projects
표 Table 2. Evaluation Criteria and Contents
그림 Fig. 2. AHP Model
표 Table 3. Demographic Characteristics
표 Table. 4. Pairwise Comparison Matrix and Relative Priority (10 people applied geometric mean)[18]. * 자료 : The Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society. Proceedings of the Spring Joint Conference. 5,920-5,925., '20)
표 Table 5. Analysis of importance by task(Training)[18]. * Data : The Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society. Proceedings of the Spring Joint Conference. 5,920-5,925., '20)

참고문헌 (27)

J. H. Moon & H. J. Kang. (2020). Analysis of usage in education and training field using XR, Digital Contents Industry Headquarters, NIPA. Issue Report(19).
K. Y. Kim. (2020). An Exploratory Study on The Effects of Early AR Users' Attributes on AR Contents Adoption and Usage. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association. 20(4), 38-48.

원문보기 상세보기
E. J. Song (2018). Virtual Reality Industry Analysis and How to Activate. Journal of the Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering. 22(4), 656-663.

원문보기 상세보기
S. H. Lee, S. J. Han & K. H. PARK. (2020). A Study on the Factors Affecting the Intention to Use the Defense Education and Training System Based on Virtual Reality. Journal of Knowledge Information Technology and Systems, 15(6), 1117-1133.
S. Aukstakalnis. (2017). Practical augmented reality: a guide to the technologies, applications and human factors for AR and VR, Pearson Education, Inc.
H. S. Jung, K. K. Kim & D. W. Hyun. (2021). Analysis of Priorities of Policy Implementation Tasks for Revitalizing Virtual Reality(VR) and Augmented Reality(AR) Industries. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association. 21(9), 12-23.

원문보기 상세보기
S. H. Lee. (2020). Study on the factors affecting the priority selection for introducing the system and the intention to use the Virtual Reality-based defense education training system, Chungnam National University Ph.D. Thesis.
M. H. Park, S. S. Lee, K. S. Jeon & H. J. Seol. (2019). A Study on the Development Direction of Education and Training System based on AR/VR Technology. Journal of the Korea Institute of Military Science and Technology, 22(4).
S. Park, S. H. Kim, J. Park & J. Na. (2011). A Study on the Development of Evaluation Indicators for Selecting Defense Core Technology Tasks Using AHP. Joural of Korea Association of Industrial Business Administration Summer Conference.
J. D. Lee, C. J. Lee, W. J. Jang & H. S. Park (2004). The Process of R&D, Journal of the Military Operations Research Society of Korea, 30(2).
S. J. Han. (2020). Study of Deriving Military Weather-Modification Technologies Suitable for Korean Environment and It's Establishment. Chungnam National University Ph.D. Thesis.
J. S. Bang & E. J. Choi. (2017). AR(Augmented Reality) Internal and external technology trends and development prospects. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information Emerging Issue Report 16.
B. H. Lee, J. H. Kim, K. Y. Shin, D. W. Kim, W. W. Lee & N. H. Kim. (2018). A study on the actual precision shooting training based on virtual reality. Convergence security journal. 18(4), 62-71.
Saaty, R. W. (1987), "The Analytic HierarchyProcess-What It Is and How It Used,"Mathematical Modelling, 9(3), 161-176.

상세보기
S. Y. Yu. (2012). A Study on Evaluation Model of Business Process Management Systems based on Analytical Hierarchy Process. Management & Information Systems Review. 31(4), 433-444.

원문보기 상세보기
Y. S. Nam & H. S. Im. (2011). A Study for MICE Multiplex location attributes which use AHP. The Geographical Journal of Korea. 45(4), 125-136.
S. J. Park & C. Go. (2011). Analysis of Key Factors in Operational Control Transition Resolution using Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP). Journal of Digital Convergence. 9(6), 153-163.

원문보기 상세보기
S. H. Lee, S. B. Park, H. W. Yang, S. J. Han (2020). (A) Study on the Pr ior ity Selection for business development of the Defense Education and Training System Based on Virtual Reality, The Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society. Proceedings of the Spring Joint Conference. 5,920-5,925.
M. C. Kim, Y. C. Jang, & S. G. Lee. (2013) Application of Delphi-AHP methods to select the priorities of WEEE for recycling in a waste management decision-making tool, Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 128, 941-948.

상세보기
Lirn, T. C. (2004) An Application of AHP on Transhipment Port Selection: A Global Perspective", Maritime Economics & Logistics, 6(1), 70-91.

상세보기
S. J. Han & S. M. Lee. (2019) The Quantification of Considerations related with Decision-making in Ground Operation : Focusing on Evaluating Avenues of Approach in IPB, Journal of convergence security, 19(2), 129-136.
T. L. Saaty. (1989). Group decision making and the AHP. In The analytic hierarchy process. 59-67.
H. Kang, S. Kim, T. Lee, M. Jang and A. Lee (2021). Examining the Strategic Priorities for Smart City Project with Analytic Hierarchy Process Based on a Survey of Potential Residents. Journal of Digital Convergence. 19(12), 243-253.

원문보기 상세보기
T. L. Saaty. (1990). How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European journal of operational research, 48(1), 9-26.

상세보기
Y. K. Chung, & S. S. Lee. (2013). A Study on Development Strategy of Korean Hidden Champion Firm Utilizing the SWOT/AHP Technique. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 8(3), 97-111.

원문보기 상세보기
K. T. Kim, J. H. Han & H. E. Lee. (2020). A Case Study on Safety Measures for Users Experiencing the Virtual Reality - Focusing on Experiential Space for Immersive Virtual Reality. Journal of Korea Intitute of Spatial Design, 15(3), 161-168.
J. W. Hong. (2017). Considerations and suggestions for virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR), The magazine of KIICE 18(1), 36-42

저자의 다른 논문 :

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증