$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

고등학교 수학 교사 인식에 나타난 과정 중심 평가와 수행 차이 및 어려움
Difficulties and differences in perception and performance on process-based assessment for high school mathematics teacher 원문보기

Journal of the Korean Society of Mathematical Education. Series A. The Mathematical Education, v.61 no.2, 2022년, pp.239 - 256  

오서영 (부평고등학교) ,  권나영 (인하대학교)

초록

이 연구는 고등학교 수학 교사의 과정 중심 평가에 대한 인식과 실제 수행, 어려움 및 문제점을 조사하기 위해 진행되었다. 연구를 위해 인천 지역 고등학교 수학 교사 6명을 대상으로 과정 중심 평가 경험에 따라 두 그룹으로 나눈 뒤 심층 그룹면담을 실시하였다. 연구 결과, 참여자의 과정 중심 평가에 대한 인식과 실제 수행에 대한 생각에 차이가 나타났고 평가 경험의 많고 적음에 따른 차이도 확인되었다. 그리고 교사들이 과정 중심 평가를 수행하는 데 있어서 느끼는 어려움을 네 가지 차원의 제약(물리적, 교사의 전문성, 학교 문화, 사회 문화 차원)으로 나누어 분석하고, 그 연구 결과를 바탕으로 시사점을 제안한다.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

This study was to investigate the perception, performance, and difficulties of process-based assessment for high school mathematics teachers. As a qualitative case study, two in-depth group interviews were conducted with 6 high school mathematics teachers working in Incheon area. The two groups were...

주제어

표/그림 (5)

참고문헌 (47)

  1. Choi, E. J. (2020). A study on the Korean language teachers' perception and assessment competencies of process-fortified assessment. Language and Information Society, 39, 109-146. 

  2. Choi, S. K. (2018). A study on the practice of process-focused assessment-Focusing on perceptions of Korean language teachers and application methods of Korean language education. Journal of CheongRam Korean Language Education, 68, 129-176. https://doi.org/10.26589/jockle..68.201812.129 

  3. Chung, S. K., Lee, K. H., Yoo, Y. J., Shin, B. M., Park, M. M. & Han, S. Y. (2012). A survey of teachers' perspectives on process-focused assessment in school mathematics. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 22(3), 401-427. 

  4. Creswell, J. W. (2015). Qualitative inquiry and research design-Choosing among five approaches(3rd Edition). (Cho, H. S., Jeon, S. W., Kim, J. S. & Kwon, J. S. Trans). Hak-Ji Sa (2013 publication). 

  5. Earl, L. M. (2013). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning (2nd Edition). Thousand Oaks, Corwin. 

  6. Gyeonggido Office of Education (2021). Guidelines for the implementation of high school academic performance management for the 2021 school year. School Curriculum Department, Gyeonggido Office of Education. 

  7. Hong, S. H., Chang, I. S. & Kim, T. S. (2017). Elementary school teachers' recognition of process-centered evaluation using consensual qualitative research (CQR) . The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35(4), 47-69. 

  8. Ju, J. J., Gu, J. H., Kim, S. D., Lee, H. J. & Choi, Y. A. (2017). A study on the status of performance assessment as a process-based assessment and improvement. 2017-15. GIE. 

  9. Kang, H. R. (2015). Normalization of public schools, hyukshin schools, and the politics of articulation. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.15708/kscs.33.1.201503.001 

  10. Kang, H. Y., Ko, E. S., Lee, D. H., Lee, H. Y., Tak, B. J., Cho, J. W., & Kim, S. H. (2018). A study on professional development program for mathematics teachers about process-focused assessment. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 28(3), 321-343. https://doi.org/10.29275/jerm.2018.08.28.3.321 

  11. Kim, E. J., & Kim, E. R. (2021). Exploring the supporting factors to process-based assessment of elementary school teachers through IPA analysis. The Journal of Elementary Education, 34(1), 163-186. https://doi.org/10.29096/JEE.34.1.07 

  12. Kim, H. D., Kim, S. H. & Hwang, J. B. (2019). A survey on Korean English teachers' perceptions of the process-oriented English assessment in Korean secondary schools. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 19(3), 500-522. 

  13. Kim, J. H. (2008). The learner-centered mathematics instruction and performance assessment. Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 12(1), 47-58. 

  14. Kim, J. Y. (2017a). Five future education codes. Soulhouse. 

  15. Kim, P. W. (2018). A study on the improvement of the comprehensive school report based on teachers' perceptions of fairness about the university admission in Korea. Education Reserch Institute, 24(3), 105-126. https://doi.org/10.24159/joec.2018.24.3.105 

  16. Kim, S. W., & Suh, W. S. (2020) An analysis on the stages of secondary school teachers' concern and levels of use for process-based assessment. Teacher Education Research, 59(2), 273-289. 

  17. Kim, S. W. (2007a). A study on analysis and alternatives of performance assessment in high school science subject. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 20(4), 53-73. 

  18. Kim, S. Y. (2007b). Teacher assessment literacy and student assessment training for teachers. Journal of Education Evaluation, 20(1), 1-16. 

  19. Kim, S. Y. (2014). Teacher's cognitions and implementation on student assessment. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 27(1), 141-161. 

  20. Kim, Y. H., Noh, E. H., Kim, I. S., Park, J. L., Lee, I. W., Kim, M. K., ... & Yu, C. W. (2017). How do we performance assessment that emphasizes the process? Secondary levels. ORM 2017-19-2. KICE. 

  21. Kim, Y. J., Lee, G. G. & Hong, H. G. (2019). A case study on teacher's process-centered evaluation competency(T-PEC) :Focused on the case of a middle-school/a high-school science teacher. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 39(6), 695-706. 

  22. Kim, Y. K. (2017b). Action research on math competencies-oriented assessment of integrated instruction. Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 21(1), 93-113. 

  23. Kim, E. J., & Kim, E. R. (2021). Exploring the supporting factors to process-based assessment of elementary school teachers through IPA analysis. The Journal of Elementary Education, 34(1), 163-186. https://doi.org/10.29096/JEE.34.1.07 

  24. Ko, H. (2019). The study on the perception, actual condition, and support strategies of process-centered assessment by each teacher. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 19(9), 1137-1164. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2019.19.9.1137 

  25. Kong, J. W., Park, E. A. & Lee, J. Y. (2018). A study on high school students' perceptions of K university admission officer system. Admission Studies, 6, 219-252. 

  26. Ku, B. K. (2020). Robot era, human work. Across. 

  27. Kwon, N. Y. & Oh, S. Y. (2020). Secondary mathematics teachers' perceptions on assessment. The Mathematical Education, 59(4), 295-312. https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2020.59.4.295 

  28. Kwon, S. A., & Kang, J. H. (2020). The effects of learner and teacher characteristics on academic achievement in middle school curriculum. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 20(9), 553-577. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2020.20.9.553 

  29. Lee, H. B. (2016). The change of the evaluation policy and the agenda of the evaluation innovation. Field Studies in Korean Language Education, 10(2), 7-33. 

  30. Lee, H. J. (2018). Korean examination: The examination revolution and the direction of academic counseling. Counseling and Guidance, 53, 77-92. 

  31. Lee, J. Y., Baek, K. H. & Baek, M. K. (2021). High school teachers and parents' perceptions on the evaluation criteria of school-record focused selection system: focusing on the case of J university. The Korea Contents Society, 21(2), 374-385. 

  32. Lee, J. Y., Kim, S. H. & Lee. H. C. (2016). Teachers' recognition of the problems in mathematics education and development of math textbooks from the perspective of learner-centered education. Communications of Mathematical Education, 30(4), 499-514. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2016.30.4.499 

  33. Lee, J. Y., Kwon, N. Y., Kang, J. H., Oh, J. H. & Lee, E. B. (2019). Current status and issues of school innovation perceived by teachers of innovative pilot schools and regular public schools: An IPA study. Journal of Educational Technology, 35(2), 395-423. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.35.2.395 

  34. Lim, E. Y. (2019). A study on teacher's competency of student assessment. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 22(1), 101-124. https://doi.org/10.29221/jce.2019.22.1.101 

  35. Lim, J. H., & Choi, W. S. (2018). A study on characteristics and meanings of 'process-focused evaluation' in the free semester program. The Journal of Korean Education, 45(3), 1-32. 

  36. Ministry of Education & KEDI (2020). Education statistical yearbook 2020. KEDI. 

  37. Ministry of Education (2015). Elementary and secondary curriculum overview. Ministry of Education Notice No. 2015-74. 

  38. Nam, B. H., & Oh, Y. H. (2017). The reality and tasks of high school education based on parent's perspectives. Korean Association for International Culture Exchanging, 6(1), 75-97. 

  39. Oh, S. Y., Kwon, N. Y. & Kim, S. M. (2019). Perceptions of high school mathematics teachers on process-focused assessment. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 29(4), 507-524. https://doi.org/10.29275/jerm.2019.11.29.4.507 

  40. Oh, Y. B. (2019). Exploring directions through analysis of meanings of learning centered classes: Based on the practice of elementary school teachers. The Journal of Elementary Education, 32(4), 107-132. https://doi.org/10.29096/JEE.32.4.05 

  41. Park, E. S., & Kim, I. S. (2014). Search for the real condition of mathematics evaluation and teachers' perception in free semester system. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 14, 243-272. 

  42. Park, J. H., Jin, K. A., Kim, S. J. & Lee, S. A. (2018). A study for enhancing the teacher' expertise in student assessment for stabilizing process-fortified assessment policy. RRE2018-5. KICE. 

  43. Park, J. I. (2015). A study on the future direction of the online formative assessment system for learning korean language arts. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation, 31, 41-60. https://doi.org/10.14333/KJTE.2015.31.S.41 

  44. Seidman, I. (2009). Interviewing as qualitative research(3rd Edition). (Park. H. J. & Lee, S. Y. Trans). Hak-Ji Sa (2006 publication). 

  45. Shin, H. J., Ahn, S. Y. & Kim, Y. W. (2017). A policy analysis on the process-based evaluation-Focusing on middle school teachers in Seoul. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 20(2), 135-162. https://doi.org/10.29221/jce.2017.20.2.135 

  46. Yi, K. H., Jeon, H. R. & Choi, Y. J. (2017). An analysis of determinants of college admission types among high school students in seoul : Comparison between general admission and comprehensive school report policy. Journal of Educational Studies, 48(3), 77-106. https://doi.org/10.15854/jes.2017.09.48.3.77 

  47. Yuk, K. M. (2018). A Study on the teacher's attitudes and implications after applying 'Curriculum-Class-Evaluation-Record alignment'. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 20(2), 705-726. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2020.20.1.705 

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

FREE

Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로