[논문]PCK 관점에서 예비과학교사의 맥락적 NOS 수업 계획 분석

김혜린; 노태희; 김민환

doi:10.14697/jkase.2023.43.6.521

[국내논문] PCK 관점에서 예비과학교사의 맥락적 NOS 수업 계획 분석
An Analysis of Preservice Science Teachers' Contextualized NOS Lesson Planning from the Perspectives of Pedagogical Content Knowledge 원문보기

한국과학교육학회지 = Journal of the Korean association for science education, v.43 no.6, 2023년, pp.521 - 531

김혜린 (서울대학교) , 노태희 (서울대학교) , 김민환 (서울대학교 교육종합연구원)

초록
AI-Helper

이 연구에서는 예비과학교사가 계획한 맥락적 NOS 수업을 PCK 관점에서 분석하였다. 서울특별시에 소재한 사범대학에서 교육과정을 모두 이수한 예비과학교사 8명이 연구에 참여하였다. 이들이 작성한 CoRe와 교수학습 지도안을 수집하고 면담을 실시하였다. 분석적 귀납법을 활용하여 수집한 자료를 분석하였다. 연구 결과, 예비교사들이 학습 목표로 선택한 NOS는 수업 주제보다는 NOS를 가르치는 맥락에 따라 다르게 나타났다. 또한 예비교사들은 NOS 학습의 가치를 잘 답변하지 못했다. 모든 예비교사가 학생들이 NOS를 잘 이해하지 못할 것을 우려하였으며, NOS를 과학 내용과 함께 다룬다는 점에서 많은 어려움을 느꼈다. 예비교사들은 학생들이 직접 실험을 하면 오차로 인해 학생들이 NOS를 배우는 데 문제가 생길 것이라고 생각하였다. 한편 예비교사들은 자신의 경험을 근거로 학생들의 NOS에 대한 선개념과 오개념을 추측하였으며, 과학 개념이나 학생의 인지 발달 단계가 NOS 학습에 영향을 미칠 것이라고 생각하기도 했다. 교수 전략 측면에서 NOS를 가르치기 위해 다양한 전략을 사용했음에도 불구하고 NOS를 명시적으로 다루지는 않는 경우가 많았다. 평가전략 측면에서도 수업에서 다루는 NOS를 평가하지 않으려는 모습이 나타났다. 이상의 결과를 바탕으로 예비교사 교육을 위한 시사점을 제안하였다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

In this study, we analyzed contextualized NOS lessons planned by preservice teachers from the perspectives of PCK. Eight preservice teachers who had completed all of the curriculum at the College of Education located in Seoul participated in the study. CoRe and teaching and learning guidance were collected. Interviews were also conducted. We used analytical induction to analyze the collected data. The analyses of the results revealed that the NOS learning goals selected by the preservice teachers were different depending on the context of the NOS lessons. In addition, the preservice teachers were unable to sufficiently explain the value of learning NOS. All of the preservice teachers were worried that their students would not understand NOS properly, and they faced various difficulties in dealing with NOS and science content. They thought that if their students conducted experiments, errors could cause problems for students learning NOS. Meanwhile, they guessed their students' preconceptions and misconceptions of NOS based on their experience. The preservice teachers also thought that their students' concept of science and cognitive development stage would affect their NOS learning. Although the preservice teachers used various strategies to teach NOS, NOS was often not explicitly addressed. Also, they were reluctant to evaluate NOS in lessons. Based on the above results, educational implications for preservice teacher education were proposed.

Keyword

표/그림 (1)

그림 Figure 1. CoRe for NOS lesson

참고문헌 (52)

Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). The influence of history？of science courses on students' views of nature of science. Journal？of Research in Science Teaching, 37(10), 1057-1095.

상세보기
Aikenhead, G. S. (2006). Science education for everyday life: Evidence-based？practice. Teachers College Press.
Akerson, V. L., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2003). Teaching elements of nature？of science: A yearlong case study of a fourth grade teacher. Journal？of Research in Science Teaching, 40(10), 1025-1049.

상세보기
Allchin, D. (2014). From science studies to scientific literacy: A view from？the classroom. Science & Education, 23(9), 1911-1932.
Allchin, D., Andersen, H. M., & Nielsen, K. (2014). Complementary？approaches to teaching nature of science: Integrating student inquiry,？historical cases, and contemporary cases in classroom practice. Science？Education, 98(3), 461-486.
Bell, R. L., Lederman, N. G., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2000). Developing？and acting upon one's conception of the nature of science: A follow-up？study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 563-581.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. (2006). Qualitative research for education: An？introduction to theory and methods. Allyn & Bacon.
Byun, T., Baek, J., Shim, H.-P., & Lee, D. (2019). An investigation on？the implementation of the 'Scientific Inquiry Experiment' of the 2015？Revised Curriculum. Journal of the Korean Association for Science？Education, 39(5), 669-679.
Cho, Y., & Choi, W. (2018). Comparison of pre-service science teachers'？epistemological views and pre-service science teachers' responses on？the discrepant cases. School Science Journal, 12(3), 297-308.
Clough, M. P. (2006). Learners' responses to the demands of conceptual？change: Considerations for effective nature of science instruction.？Science & Education, 15(5), 463-494.
Cofre, H., Nunez, P., Santibanez, D., Pavez, J. M., Valencia, M., & Vergara,？C. (2019). A critical review of students' and teachers' understandings？of nature of science. Science & Education, 28(3-5), 205-248.
Demirdogen, B., Hanuscin, D. L., Uzuntiryaki-Kondakci, E., & Koseoglu,？F. (2016). Development and nature of preservice chemistry teachers'？pedagogical content knowledge for nature of science. Research in？Science Education, 46(4), 575-612.

상세보기
French, M. (2012). Using the Science Museum's 'Mystery Boxes' as a model？for science and 'How science works'. School Science Review, 94(347),？15-16.

상세보기
Gess-Newsome, J. (2015). A model of teacher professional knowledge and？skill including PCK: Results of the thinking from the PCK summit.？In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining？pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 28-42).？Routledge Press.
Han, S., Lee, I., Kang, S., & Noh, T. (2011). An investigation of elementary？school teachers' epistemological beliefs about science on the bases？of their strategies for coping with critical incidents. Journal of Korean？Elementary Science Education, 30(1), 61-70.
Hanuscin, D. L., Lee, M. H., & Akerson, V. L. (2011). Elementary teachers'？pedagogical content knowledge for teaching the nature of science.？Science Education, 95(1), 145-167.
Kang, K.-H. (2013). Analysis of pre-service science teachers' views on the？philosophy of science. Journal of Education Science, 15(1), 69-84.
Kang, K.-H. (2020). The effect of science history learning and lesson？demonstration using science history on pre-service biology teachers'？perception about the nature of science. Biology Education, 48(2),？155-167.
Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). The influence of explicit reflective？versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders' views of？nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7),？551-578.
Khishfe, R., & Lederman, N. (2006). Teaching nature of science within a？controversial topic: Integrated versus nonintegrated. Journal of？Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), 395-418.

상세보기
Kim, M., Kim, H., & Noh, T. (2022). An analysis of pre-service science？teachers' NOS lesson planning and demonstration: In the context of？'Science Inquiry Experiment' developed under the 2015 Revised？National Curriculum. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 66(2),？150-162.
Kim, M., Kim, H., Jang, J., & Noh, T. (2023). A case study on science？teachers' implementation of nos assessments in 'scientific inquiries in？the history' of science inquiry experiment. Journal of the Korean？Association for Science Education, 43(3), 191-207.
Kim, M., Shin, H., Noh, T. (2020). An exploration of science teachers'？NOS-PCK: Focus on Science Inquiry Experiment. Journal of the？Korean Association for Science Education, 40(4), 399-413.
Kim, S. Y. (2010). Exploring preservice science teachers' views of the nature？of science: biology vs. non-biology teachers. Journal of the Korean？Association for Science Education, 30(2), 206-217.
Kim, S. Y. (2016). Construction of preservice biology teachers' NOS？pedagogical content knowledge within biology teaching context.？Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(1),？147-158.

원문보기 상세보기
Kim, S. Y. (2020). The effect of PCK based NOS program using the context？of science inquiry experiment for preservice science teachers. Biology？Education, 48(1), 76-87.
Leden, L., Hansson, L., Redfors, A., & Ideland, M. (2015). Teachers' ways？of talking about nature of science and its teaching. Science &？Education, 24(9-10), 1141-1172.
Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature？of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science？Teaching, 29(4), 331-359.

상세보기
Lederman, N. G. (1999). Teachers' understanding of the nature of science？and classroom practice: Factors that facilitate or impede the？relationship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(8), 916-929.

상세보기
Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future.？Handbook of Research on Science Education, 2, 831-879.
Lee, J., Park, Y., & Jeong, D. (2016). Exploring the level of nature of science？and its degree of revising curriculums: The case of the 7th and 2009？Revised Curriculums. Journal of Korean Society of Earth Science？Education, 9(2), 217-232.
Lim, C.-H., Kim, H.-J., Lee, S.-H. (2004). Preservice and inservice teachers'？perception on the nature of science. Journal of Korean Elementary？Science Education, 23(4), 297-304.
Loughran, J. (2006). Developing a pedagogy of teacher education:？Understanding teaching and learning about teaching. Routledge.
Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2008). Exploring pedagogical content？knowledge in science teacher education. International Journal of？Science Education, 30(10), 1301-1320.

상세보기
Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and？development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching.？In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical？content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science？education (pp. 95-132). Kluwer.
McComas, W. F., & Nouri, N. (2016). The nature of science and the next？generation science standards: Analysis and critique. Journal of Science？Teacher Education, 27(5), 555-576.

상세보기
Ministry of Education (MOE) (2015). 2015 Revised Science National？Curriculum. Seoul: Ministry of Education.
Ministry of Education (MOE) (2022). 2022 Revised Science National？Curriculum. Sejong: Ministry of Education.
Moon, K.-W., & Kim, Y.-S. (2009). Secondary biology teachers' experiences？and opinions of experiments on photosynthesis and respiration. The？Korean Journal of Biological Education, 37(2), 269-286.
Nam, J., Mayer, V. J., Choi, J., & Lim, J. (2007). Pre-service science？teachers' understanding of the nature of science. Journal of the Korean？Association for Science Education, 27(3), 253-262.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states,？by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Nott, M., & Wellington, J. (1998). Eliciting, interpreting and developing？teachers' understandings of the nature of science. Science & Education,？7, 579-594.
Olson, J. K. (2018). The inclusion of the nature of science in nine recent？international science education standards documents. Science &？Education, 27(7), 637-660.
Padilla, K., & van Driel, J. (2011). The relationships between PCK？components: The case of quantum chemistry professors. Chemistry？Education Research and Practice, 12(3), 367-378.

상세보기
Park, E., & Hong, H.-G. (2011). Analyzing science-gifted middle school？students' understandings of nature of science (NOS). Journal of？Gifted/Talented Education, 21(2), 391-405.
Park, S., & Chen, Y.-C. (2012). Mapping out the integration of the？components of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): Examples from？high school biology classrooms. Journal of Research in Science？Teaching, 49(7), 922-941.

상세보기
Sahin, E. A., & Deniz, H. (2016). Exploring elementary teachers' perceptions？about the developmental appropriateness and importance of nature of？science aspects. International Journal of Environmental and Science？Education, 11(9), 2673-2698.
Schwartz, R. S., & Lederman, N. G. (2002). 'It's the nature of the beast':？The influence of knowledge and intentions on learning and teaching？nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(3),？205-236.

상세보기
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in？teaching. Educational Research, 15(2), 4-14.
Song, J., Kang, S., Kwak, Y., Kim, D., Kim, S., Na, J., ... Joung, Y. (2019).？Contents and features of 'Korean Science Education Standards？(KSES)' for the next generation. Journal of the Korean Association？for Science Education, 39(3), 465-478.
Sweeney, S. J. (2010). Factors affecting early elementary (K-4) teachers'？introduction of the nature of science: A national survey. [Unpublished？doctoral dissentation]. University of Arkansas.
Williams, J., Eames, C., Hume, A., & Lockley, J. (2012). Promoting？pedagogical content knowledge development for early career secondary？teachers in science and technology using content representations.？Research in Science & Technological Education, 30(3), 327-343.

상세보기

저자의 다른 논문 :

활용도 분석정보

상세보기

다운로드

내보내기

활용도 Top5 논문

해당 논문의 주제분야에서 활용도가 높은 상위 5개 콘텐츠를 보여줍니다.
더보기 버튼을 클릭하시면 더 많은 관련자료를 살펴볼 수 있습니다.

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증