[논문]2015 개정 과학과 교육과정의 '기능' 기반 탐구 수업에 참여한 고등학생의 과학과 핵심역량에 대한 인식

박상유; 최원호

doi:10.14697/jkase.2023.43.2.87

2015 개정 과학과 교육과정의 '기능' 기반 탐구 수업에 참여한 고등학생의 과학과 핵심역량에 대한 인식
Perception of Science Core Competencies of High School Students who Participated in the 'Skills' based Inquiry Class of the 2015 Revised Science Curriculum 원문보기

한국과학교육학회지 = Journal of the Korean association for science education, v.43 no.2, 2023년, pp.87 - 98

초록
AI-Helper

본 연구는 2015 개정 과학과 교육과정의 8가지 '기능'을 활용한 과학 탐구 수업을 실시했을 때 고등학생들의 과학과 핵심역량에 대한 인식 변화와 변화 이유에 대하여 조사하였다. 본 연구의 과학 탐구 수업에 전라남도 소재 고등학교 1학년 15명이 참여하였으며, 수업은 20시간(하루 5시간 4일) 진행하였다. 수업에서 이용한 탐구 활동은 연구 문제, 연구 방법, 연구 결과, 결론의 4개 활동 단계로 구성되어 있으며 각 활동 단계에 8가지 '기능 (문제 인식, 모형의 개발과 사용, 탐구 설계와 수행, 자료의 수집·분석 및 해석, 수학적 사고와 컴퓨터 활용, 결론 도출 및 평가, 증거에 기초한 토론과 논증, 의사소통)'이 최소 1회 이상 포함되도록 구성하였다. 연구 결과, 탐구 수업을 통해 학생들의 5가지 과학과 핵심역량에 대한 인식이 유의수준 0.01 기준으로 통계적으로 유의미하게 증가하였으며, 93% 이상의 학생들이 수업을 통해 과학과 핵심역량이 향상하였다고 인식했다. 하지만 본 연구의 수업은 소수 학생을 대상으로 실시하였기 때문에 수업의 효과를 일반화하기는 어려우므로, 많은 학생을 대상으로 한 정량적 연구 수행이 필요하다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

In this study, we investigated the change in science core competency perception of high school students and the reason for change when science inquiry classes were conducted using eight 'skills' of the 2015 revised science curriculum. Fifteen first-year high school students in Jeollanam-do participated in the science inquiry class of this study, and the class was conducted for 20 hours (5 hours a day for four days). The inquiry activities used in the class consisted of four activity stages (research problems, research methods, research results, and conclusions) and each stage was constructed to include at least one 'skill (Problem Recognition, Model Development and Use, Inquiry Design and Performance, Data Collection, Analysis and Interpretation, Mathematical Thinking and Computer Application, Conclusion and Evaluation, Evidence-based Discussion and Demonstration, and Communication)'. As a result of the study, students' perception of the five science core competencies increased statistically significantly at the significance level of 0.01 through inquiry classes and more than 93% of students recognized that their science core competencies improved through the classes. However, since the class of this study was conducted for a small number of students, it is difficult to generalize the effect of the class, and so it is necessary to conduct a quantitative study for many students.

주제어

표/그림 (8)

표 Table 1. Definition of 'skills' in the 2015 revised science curriculum
표 Table 2. The stages of activities that include the 'skills' of the 2015 revised science curriculum
표 Table 3. Average score of science core competency
표 Table 4. Response types of students who perceived that scientific thinking ability improved
표 Table 5. Response types of students who perceived that scientific inquiry ability improved
표 Table 6. Response types of students who perceived that scientific problem solving ability improved
표 Table 7. Response types of students who perceived that scientific communication ability improved
표 Table 8. Response types of students who perceived that scientific participation & lifelong learning ability improved

참고문헌 (39)

Chinn, C. A., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2002). Authentic inquiry: Introduction？to the special section. Science Education, 86(2), 171-174.
Collette, A. T., & Chiappetta, E. L. (1984). Science Instruction in the Middle？and Secondary Schools. The CV Mosby Company, 11830 Westline？Industrial Drive, St. Louis, MO 63146.
Keys, C. W., Hand, B., Prain, V., & Collons, S. (1999). Using the science？writing heuristic as a tool for learning from laboratory investigations？in secondary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(10).？1065-1084.

상세보기
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, Learning, and values. Ablex？Publishing Corporation, 355 Chestnut Street, Norwood, NJ 07648？(hardback: ISBN-0-89391-565-3; paperback: ISBN-0-89391-566-1).
NGSS. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States.？USA: NGSS Lead States.
OECD. (2003). Defining and selection of competencies: Theoretical and？conceptual foundation. OECD Press.
Watson, J. R. & Swain, J. R. L. (2004). Student's discussions in practical？scientific inquiries. International Journal of Science Education, 26(1),？25-45.
Byun, S., & Kim, H. (2011). Recognition of free inquiry activity and its？effects on the science inquiry ability of middle school students. Journal？of the Korean Association for Science Education, 31(2), 210-224.
Chae, H., & Lee, Y. (2020). A Study of Development and Effect Analysis？of Biology Science Inquiry Program based on the Core Competencies？for Free Learning Year of Middles School. The Korean Journal of？Biological Education, 48(3), 466-476.
Choi, J., & Paik, S. (2015). A comparative analysis of achievement standards？of the 2007 & 2009 revised elementary science curriculum with next？generation science standards in US based on Bloom's revised？taxonomy. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education,？35(2), 277-288.
Choi, J., & Woo, A. (2020). Effect of Science Practice-based Class on？Improving Middle School Students' Science Core Competency. Journal？of Research in Curriculum & Instruction, 38(4), 495-504.
Go, Y., & Kang, K. (2014). Influence of the Participation of Science Inquiry？Program on Middle School Students' Scientific Attitude and Problem？Solving Ability. Educational Research, 59, 25-43.
Ha, M., Lee, K., Choi, E., Kim, I., Yu, J., & Won, B. (2019). Exploring？the effect of first year science-focused school program on high school？students' science core competency and science learning motivation？using group-based trajectory modeling. Journal of The Korean？Association For Science Education, 39(6), 799-807.
Ha, M., Park, H., Kim, Y., Kang, N., Oh, P., Kim, M., Min, J., Lee, Y.,？Han, H., Kim, M., Ko, S., & Son, M. (2018). Developing and applying？the questionnaire to measure science core competencies based on the？2015 revised national science curriculum. Journal of the Korean？Association for Science Education, 38(4), 495-504.
Han, H., Kim, K., Lee, J., & Chang, K. (2018). Exploring issues for effective？implementation of competency-based curriculum through analysis of？domestic research trends. Journal of Curriculum Evaluation, 21(3),？1-24.

상세보기
Hwang, H., & Woo, A. (2019). Effects of Open Inquiry on Scientific Problem？Solving Ability and Scientific Communication Ability. The Journal？of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 19(17), 377-399.

상세보기
Im, J., Na E., & Choi W. (2021). The effect of inquiry experience using？reflective thinking on research problem setting ability and inquiry？design ability of pre-service science teachers. The Journal of？Educational Development, 40(3), 765-790.
Jang, K., Nam, J., & Choi, A. (2012). The effects of argument-based inquiry？using the Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) approach on argument？structure in students' writing. Journal of the Korean Association for？Science Education, 32(7), 1099-1108.
Jeong, H., & Shin, D. (2018). The Effect of the 'Environment and Energy'？Theme-based Integration Program on Science Key Competencies.？Jounral of Energy and Climate Change Education, 8(2), 195-205.
Jeong, Y., Min, Y., & Lee, J. (2019). A study on understanding of key？competency curriculum in the 2015 revised curriculum. Journal of？earner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 19(18), 211-237.
Jung, J., & Chung, Y. (2013). Analysis of Inquiry Activities Boosting？Improvement in Scientific Inquiry Skills in the Science Writing？Heuristic (SWH). The Korean Journal of Biological Education, 14(4),？501-513.
Kang, N., & Lee, E. (2013). Argument and argumentation: A review of？literature for clarification of translated words. Journal of the Korean？Association for Science Education, 33(6), 1119-1138.
Kim, B., & Choi, W. (2022). High school students' perception of the core？competencies and class effects in inquiry class applying science writing？heuristic. The Journal of Educational Development, 42(2), 201-223.
Kim, S., & Kim, H. (2022). The Effects of Chemistry Class Using？Computer-Based Science Inquiry Program on Positive Experiences？about Science, Science Core Competency, and Academic Achievement.？Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 66(2), 107-123.
Kwon, M., & Park, J. (2020). Critical review of'skills' in the 2015 revised science national curriculum. Journal of the Korean Association for？Science Education, 40(2), 151-161.
Lee, B., Kang, Y., & Kang K. (2021). Effect of the STEAM Program Based？on'Force and Motion'in Elementary Schools on the Perception of？students Toward Science Core Competencies. Sae Mulli, 71(11),？929-937.

상세보기
Lee, G., Ki m, Y., Jang, W., Lee, J., & Hong, H. (2020). The Effect of？[Science Inquiry Experiment] of 2015 Revised National Curriculum？Towards High School Students' Science and General Core？Competencies. Journal of Curriculum Evaluation, 23(3), 23-50.
Lee, H., & Lee, J. (2010). The effect of the specific open-inquiry lesson？on the elementary student's science-related attitude, science process？skill and the instructing teachers' cognition about open-inquiry. Journal？of Science Education, 34(2), 405-420.
Lee, J., & Paik, S. (2020). The effect of science instruction through social？consensus process on science exploration ability. Convergence？Education Review, 6, 1-18.
Ministry of Education(MOE). (2015a). The general explanation of 2015？revised national curriculum. Notification No. 2015-74 [issue 1].？Sejong: Ministry of Education.
Ministry of Education(MOE). (2015b). Science curriculum. Notification No.？2015-74 [issue 9]. Sejong: Ministry of Education.
Ministry of Education Science and Technology(MEST). (2009). Elementary？and secondary school curriculum : General statement. Notification No.？2009-41. Seoul: Ministry of Education, Science and Technology.
Park, S., & Chung, Y. (2012). The effect of Science Writing Heuristic (SWH)？on scientific inquiry skills, logical thinking, and metacognition of？middle school students. Biology Education, 40(3), 367-383.
Park, S., & Moon, S. (2013). The effect of science writing heuristic？laboratory class on the creative thinking and critical thinking of middle？school students. Journal of the Korean Association for Science？Education, 33(7), 1259-1272.
Seong, J. S. (2003). An analysis of variables affecting creative problem？solving abilities in science. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 11(1),？219-237.
Shim, K., & Song, S. (2011). Study on the critical thinking of high school？students through scientific writing about bioethical issue. The Korean？Journal of Biological Education, 39(2), 288-296.
Shin, E., & Choi, W. (2021). The Perception of Middle School？Science-Gifted Students on the'Science Writing Heuristic' Class？Emphasizing Social Interaction and Tool Improvement. Journal of The？Korean Association For Science Education, 41(1), 1-10.
Song, J., & Na, J. (2015). Directions and Issues of 2015 National Science？Curriculum and their Implications to Science Classroom Culture.？School Science Journal, 9(2), 72-84.
Yun, D., Ko, E., & Choi, A. (2018). Identifying and applying components？of five scientific core competencies in the 2015 science curriculum.？Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(24),？1301-1319.

상세보기

저자의 다른 논문 :

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format