최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기초등과학교육 = Journal of Korean elementary science education, v.42 no.2, 2023년, pp.343 - 366
이혜경 (서울대학교 교육종합연구원) , 이종혁 (서울대학교 교육종합연구원) , 최진현 (서울대학교 대학원) , 김관영 (서울대학교 대학원) , 이선경 (서울대학교 교육종합연구원)
This study explored how scientific practice functions within practice-oriented science education and reviewed modeling as a unit of practice. Beginning with the questions "What is scientific practice and what is the nature of knowledge?" and "How does scientific practice work?" we reconsidered the l...
강경희, 이선경(2001). 개념변화 맥락을 구성하는 개념생태 상호작용에 관한 사례 연구. 한국과학교육학회지,?21(4), 745-756.?
강은희, 김찬종, 최승언, 유준희, 박현주, 이신영, 김희백(2012). 심장 혈액 흐름의 모형 구성 과정에서 나타난?소집단 상호작용과 소집단 규범. 한국과학교육학회지,?32(2), 372-387.?
고영준(2012). 교육적 경험의 의미: 오우크쇼트와 듀이의?관점. 교육철학연구, 34(1), 23-43.?
교육부(2015). 과학과 교육과정. 세종: 교육부.?
구리나(2011). 비트겐슈타인 철학의 교육학적 함의. 서울대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.?
구리나(2014). 비트겐슈타인의 언어적 전회와 확실성:?[확실성에 관하여]를 중심으로. 교육철학연구, 36(3),?1-23.?
김관영, 이종혁, 최진현, 전상학, 이선경(2022a). 학생의?자유 탐구 활동의 사례 분석을 통해 본 실험 모델링의?특징과 과학교육적 의미. 한국과학교육학회지, 42(2),?201-214.?
김관영, 이종혁, 최진현, 전상학, 이혜경, 이선경(2022b).?과학적 실행에서의 데이터 모델링 탐색: 현상의 생성과 증거를 만드는 과정을 중심으로. 생물교육, 50(4).?529-542.?
김만희(2003). 폴라니의 인식론에 근거한 과학교수의 내러티브적 성격 고찰. 한국교원대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.?
김미경, 김희백(2008). 개방적 참탐구 활동에서 학생들의?과학의 본성에 대한 이해에 영향을 미치는 요인 탐색.?한국과학교육학회지, 28(6), 565-578.?
김영민(1994). 글쓰기, 복잡성의 철학의 해석학을 위하여. 오늘의 문예비평, 12, 77-104.?
김지윤, 최승언, 김찬종(2016). 공동생성적 대화가 중학생의 과학적 모델에 관한 이해와 모델 구성에 미치는?영향. 한국지구과학회지, 37(4), 243-268.?
노철현(2011). 교육내용으로서의 '지식의 형식'의 의미:?오우크쇼트의 관점을 중심으로. 한국초등교육, 22(1),?159-180.?
박희경, 최종림, 김찬종, 김희백, 유준희, 장신호, 최승언(2016). 과학적 모델의 사회적 구성 수업을 통한 과학영재 학생들의 모델링 능력 변화. 한국과학교육학회지, 36(1), 15-28.?
신명경, 권경필(2016). 에너지 관련 중등 과학 교과서 단원의 과학 실행(Science Practice) 특징 탐색. 에너지기후변화교육, 6, 185-197.?
양찬호, 김수현, 조민진, 노태희(2016). 물질의 입자성에?대한 모형 구성 과정에서 나타나는 소집단 토론과 전체 학급 토론의 특징. 한국과학교육학회지, 36(3),?361-369.?
오필석(2020). 과학 교육에서 기능 중심의 과학 탐구에?대한 비판적 고찰. 한국과학교육학회지, 40(2),?141-150.?
유금복, 이종혁, 이선경(2022). 행위자-네트워크 이론으로 본 과학적 실행의 현상 생성 사례. 교과교육학연구, 26, 179-190.?
이선경, 신명경(2023). 학교 과학 교육 담론. 서울: 북스힐.?
이선경, 손정우, 김종희, 박종석, 서혜애, 심규철, 최재혁(2013). 고등학교 과학수업 사례 분석을 통한 학교 과학 탐구의 특징. 한국과학교육학회지, 33(2), 284-309.?
이신영, 김찬종, 최승언, 유준희, 박현주, 강은희, 김희백(2012). 소집단 상호작용에 따른 심장 내 혈액 흐름에?대한 소집단 모델 발달 유형과 추론 과정 탐색. 한국과학교육학회지, 32(5), 805-822.?
이종봉(2018). 과학교육에서의 지식개념에 대한 비판적?검토: Giere의 모형 기반 과학철학을 중심으로. 서울대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.?
이차은, 김희백(2016). 과학적 모형 구성 과정에서 나타난 사고 질문의 개념적 자원 활성화의 이해-인식론적?프레이밍과 위치 짓기 프레이밍을 중심으로. 한국과학교육학회지, 36(3), 471-483.?
장하석(2015). 과학, 철학을 만나다. 지식 플러스.?
장하석(2021). 물은 H 2 O인가? 증거, 실재론, 다원주의.?(전대호 역). 파주: 김영사. (원서는 2012년).?
정용재(2020). '설다'와 '익다'의 너나들이: 이종네트워크로서 과학학습. 한국과학교육학회지, 40(6), 631-648.?
정용욱(2014). 법칙, 이론, 그리고 원리: 규범적 의미와?실제사용에서의 혼란. 한국과학교육학회지, 34(5),?459-468.?
조혜숙, 남정희(2017). 과학교육에서 모델과 모델링 관련?국내 과학 교육 연구 동향 분석. 한국과학교육학회지,?37(4), 539-552.?
조희형(1992). 과학적 탐구의 본질에 대한 분석 및 탐구력 신장을 위한 학습지도 방법에 대한 연구. 한국과학교육학회지, 12(1), 61-73.?
한기철, 곽덕주, 김상섭(2010). 교육철학 방법으로서의?프래그머티즘 재음미: 프랙티스의 교육적 의미를 중심으로. 교육사상연구, 24(1), 177-203.?
Abd-El-Khalick, F., Boujaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman,?N. G., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., Niaz, M.,?Treagust, D., & Tuan, H.-L. (2004). Inquiry in science?education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397-419.?
Bailer-Jones, D. M. (2009). Scientific models in?philosophy of science. University of Pittsburgh Press.?
Berland, L. K., Schwarz, C. V., Krist, C., Kenyon, L., Lo,?A. S., & Reiser, B. J. (2016). Epistemologies in?practice: Making scientific practices meaningful for?students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,?53(7), 1082-1112.?
Bikner-Ahsbahs, A. (2009). Networking of theories-why?and how? Special plenary lecture. In V. Durand-Guerrier,?S. Soury-Lavergne, & S. Lecluse (Eds.), Proceedings of?CERME6. http://www.inrp.fr/publications/edition-electronique/cerme6/plenary-01-bikner.pdf?
Bikner-Ahsbahs, A., Bakker, A., Johnson, H. L., & Chan,?E. (2019). Introduction to the thematic working group?17 on theoretical perspectives and approaches in?mathematics education research of CERME11. In U. T. Jankvist, M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, & M.?Veldhuis (Eds.), Proceedings of CERME11. (pp.?3020-3027). Utrecht, NL: Utrecht University.?
Boumans, M. (1999). Built-in justification. In M. S.?Morgan & M. Morrison (Eds.), Models as mediators?(pp. 66-96). NY: Cambridge University Press.?
Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of?translation: Domestication of the scallops and the?fishermen of St brieuc bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power,?action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge (pp.?196-233). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.?
Carey, S., Evans, R., Honda, M., Jay, E., & Unger, C.?(1989). "An experiment is when you try it and see if?it works": A study of grade 7 students' understanding?of the construction of scientific knowledge.?International Journal of Science Education, 11, 514-529.?
Chinn, C. A., & Melhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically?authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework?for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2),?175-218.?
Chiu, M. H. & Lin, J. W. (2019). Modeling competence?in science education. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary?Science Education Research, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0012-y?
Crawford, B. A. (2014). From inquiry to scientific?practices in the science classroom. In N. G. Lederman?& S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science?education, Volume II (pp. 529-556). Routledge.?
Dewey, J. (1987). Democracy and education (Lee, H.?Trans.). Paju: Kyoyookbook. (Original work published?1916).?
Dewey, J. (2002). The child and the curriculum (Park, C.?Trans.). Seoul: Moonumsa. (Original work published?1902).?
Dunbar, K. (1995). How scientists really reason:?Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In R. J.?Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of?insight (pp. 365-395). The MIT Press.?
Duschl, A. R., Schweingruber, A. H., & Shouse, W. A.?(2007). Taking science to school: Learning and?teaching science in grades K-8. Washington DC: The?National Academies Press.?
Engestrom, Y., & Sannino, A. (2021). From mediated?actions to heterogenous coalitions: Four generations of?activity-theoretical studies of work and learning. Mind,?Culture, and Activity, 28(1), 4-23.?
Flick, L. B., & Lederman, N. G. (2006). Science inquiry?and nature of science implications for teaching,?learning, and teacher education. Dordrecht: Springer.?
Ford, M. J. (2015). Educational implications of choosing?practice to describe science in the next generation?science standards. Science Education, 99(6), 1041-1048.?
Furtak, E. M., & Penuel, W. R. (2019). Coming to terms:?Addressing the persistence of "hands-on" and other?reform terminology in the era of science as practice.?Science Education, 103(1), 167-186.?
Galison, P. (1997). Image and logic: A material culture of?microphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.?
Garcia-Mila, M., & Anderson, C. (2008). Cognitive?foundations of learning argumentation. In S. Erduran,?& M. P. Jimenz-Alexandre (Eds.), Argumentation in?science education (pp. 29-45). UK: Springer.?
Giere, R. (1988). Explaining science: A cognitive?approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.?
Giere, R. (2018). Models of experiments. In I. F. Peschard?& B. C. van Fraassen (Eds.), The experimental side of?modeling (pp. 59-70). MN: University of Minnesota?Press.?
Giere, R., Bickle, J., & Maudlin, F. (2006). Understanding?scientific reasoning. Ontario: Thomson Wadsworth.?
Gilbert, J. K., Boutler, C. J., & Elmer, R. (2000).?Positioning models in science education and in design?and technology education. In J. K. Gilbert & C. J.?Boutler (Eds.), Developing models in science education?(pp. 3-19). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.?
Grandy, R., & Duschl, R. A. (2007). Reconsidering the?character and role of inquiry in school science:?Analysis of a conference. Science & Education, 16. 141-166.?
Halloun, I. A. (2006). Modeling theory in science?education. Dordrecht: Springer.?
Hardahl, L. K., Wickman, P. O., & Calman, C. (2019).?The body and the production of phenomena in the?science laboratory. Science & Education, 28, 865-895.?
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (1997).?Minds of our own: Can we believe our eyes??[Videotape]. Annenberg Foundation.?
Havdala, R., & Ashkenazi, G. (2007). Coordination of?theory and evidence: Effect of epistemological theories?on students' laboratory practice. Journal of Research in?Science Teaching, 44(8), 1134-1159.?
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (J. Macquarrie &?E. Robinson, Trans.). New York: Haroer & Row.?
Hesse, M. (1963). Models and analogies in science.?London: Sheed and Ward.?
Hestenes, D. (1992). Modeling games in the Newtonian?world. American Journal of Physics, 60(8), 732-748.?
Hodson, D. (2009). Teaching and learning about science.?The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.?
Irzik, G., & Nola, R. (2010). A family resemblance?approach to the nature of science for science education.?Science & Education, 20(7), 591-607.?
Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Erduran, S. (2008).?Argumentation in science education: An overview. In?M. P. Jimenez-Aleixandre & S. Erduran (Eds.),?Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from?classroom-based research (pp.3-27). Dordrecht:?Springer.?
Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). The influence?of explicit reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented?instruction on sixth graders' views of nature of?science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,?39(7), 551-578.?
Kuhn, D., Amsel, E., & O'Loughlin, M. (1988). The?development of scientific thinking skills. San Diego,?CA: Academic Press.?
Kuhn, D., & Franklin, S. (2006). The second decade:?What develops (and how)? In W. Damon, & R. M.?Lerner (Series Eds.), Handbook of child psychology:?Vol. 2, Cognition, perception, and language (6th ed.,?pp. 953-993). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.?
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions.?Chicago: University of Chicago Press.?
Kwant, R. C. (1963). The phenomenological philosophy?of Merleau-Ponty. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University?Press.?
Ladyman, J. (2012). Understanding philosophy of science.?Routledge.?
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by.?Chicago: University of Chicago Press.?
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow?scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge,?MA: Harvard University Press.?
Latour, B. (2009). We have never been modern (Hong, C.?Trans.). Seoul: Galmuri. (Original work published?1991).?
Leach, J. (1998). Teaching about the world of science in?the laboratory: The influence on teaching of student's?ideas. In Wellington, J. J. (ed.), Practical work in?school science: Which way now? (pp. 52-68). NY:?Routledge.?
Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., &?Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science?questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment?of learners' conceptions of nature science. Journal of?Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497-521.?
Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2015). The development of?scientific thinking. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of?child psychology and developmental science (pp.?1-44). Hoboken: Wiley.?
Louca, L., Elby, A., Hammer, D., & Kagey, T. (2004).?Epistemological resources: Applying a new?epistemological framework to science instruction.?Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 57-68.?
Lynch, M. (1985). Art and artifacts in laboratory science:?A study of shop work and shop talk in a research?laboratory. Routledge & Kegan Paul.?
Manz, E. (2015). Representing student argumentation as?functionally emergent from scientific activity. Review?of Educational Research, 85(4), 553-590.?
Matthews, E. (1999). Twentieth-century French?philosophy. Philosophical Quarterly, 49(195), 281-283.?
Matthews, M. R. (2007). Models in science and in?science education: An introduction. Science &?Education, 16, 647-652.?
McComas, W. F., Clough, M. P., & Almazroa, H. (1998).?The role and character of the nature of science in?science education. In W. McComas (Ed.), The nature?of science education (pp. 3-39). Los Angeles: Kluwer?Academic Publisher.?
McNeill, K. L. (2011). Elementary students' views of?explanation, argumentation and evidence, and their?abilities to construct arguments over the school year.?Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 793-823.?
Mendonca, P. C. C., & Justi, R. (2011). Contributions of?the model of modelling diagram to the learning of?ionic bonding: Analysis of a case study. Research in?Science Education, 41(4), 479-503.?
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2013). Phenomenology of perception.?Routledge.?
Millar, R. (1998). Rhetoric and reality: What practical?work in science education is really for. In J.?Wellington (ed.), Practical work in school science:?Which way now? (pp. 16-31). London: Routledge.?
Miller, E., Manz, E., Russ, R., Stroupe, D., & Berland, L.?(2018). Addressing the epistemic elephant in the room:?Epistemic agency and the next generation science?standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,?55(7), 1053-1075.?
Morgan, M. S., & Morrison, M. (1999). Models as?mediators: Perspectives on natural and social science.?Cambridge University Press.?
Nagel, E. (1960). Logic without metaphysics. Philosophy,?35(132), 81-83.?
National Research Council. (1996). National science?education standards. Washington, D.C.: National?Academy Press.?
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for?K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting?concepts, and core ideas. Washington, D.C.: National?Academies Press.?
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science?education standards: For states, by states. Washington,?D.C.: The Academies Press.?
Oakeshott, M. (1992). Learning and teaching (Cha, M.?Ttrans.). gyoyugjinheung (spring-summer), 126-143,?155-169. (Original work published 1967).?
O'Hara, J. G., & Pricha, W. (1987). Hertz and the?Maxwellians: A study and documentation of the?discovery of electromagnetic wave radiation. London:?Peter Peregrinus Ltd.?
Paavola, S., & Hakkarainen, K. (2005). The knowledge?creation metaphor: An emergent epistemological?approach to learning. Science & Education, 14(6),?535-557.?
Passmore, C., & Svoboda, J. (2012). Exploring?opportunities for argumentation in modelling?classrooms. International Journal of Science Education,?34(10), 1535-1554.?
Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time,?agency, and science. Chicago: University of Chicago?Press.?
Pierson, A. E., & Clark, D. B. (2019). Sedimentation of?modeling practices. Science & Education, 28, 897-925.?
Pierson, A. E., Clark, D. B., & Kelly, G. J. (2019).?Learning progressions and science practices. Science &?Education, 28, 833-841.?
Pierson, A. E., Clark, D. B., & Sherard, M. K. (2017).?Learning progressions in context: Tensions and insights?from a semester-long middle school modeling?curriculum. Science Education, 101(6), 1061-1088.?
Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge. Chicago:?University of Chicago Press.?
Polanyi, M. (1969). Knowing and being. Routledge and?Kegan Paul.?
Potts, L. (2008). Diagramming with actor-network theory:?A method for modeling holistic experience. Paper?presented in 2008 International Conference on?Professional Communication.?
Prediger, S., Bikner-Ahsbahs, A., & Arzarello, F. (2008).?Networking strategies and methods for connecting?theoretical approaches: First steps towards a conceptual?framework. ZDM International Journal on Mathematics?Education, 40(2), 165-178.?
Rea-Ramirez, M. A., Clement, J., & Nunez-Oviedo, M.?C. (2008). An instructional model derived from model?construction and criticism theory. In J. J. Clement &?M. A. Rea-Ramirez (Eds.), Model based learning and?instruction in science (pp. 23-43). The Netherlands:?Springer.?
Rouse, J. (2007). Practice theory. In S. Turner & M.?Risjord (Eds.), Handbook of the philosophy of science?Vol 15: Philosophy of anthropology and sociology (pp.?630-681). Dordrecht: Elsevier.?
Rudolph, J. L. (2005). Inquiry, instrumentalism, and the?public understanding of science. Science Education, 89,?803-821.?
Schank, R. C., & Abelson, P. A. (1977). Scripts, plans,?goals, and understanding: An inquiry into human?knowledge structures. Psychology Press.?
Sikorski, T. R. (2019). Context-dependent "upper?anchors" for learning progressions. Science &?Education, 28, 957-981.?
Suppe, F. (Ed.). (1977). The structure of scientific?theories. University of Illinois Press.?
Svoboda, J., & Passmore, C. (2013). The strategies of?modeling in biology education. Science & Education,?22, 119-142.?
Wellington, J. (1998). Practical work in science: Time for?a reappraisal. In Wellington, J. J. (Ed.), Practical work in school science: Which way now? (pp. 3-15). NY:?Routledge.?
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). The philosophical investigations.?Oxford: Blackwell.?
Woolnough, B. E. (1989). Towards a holistic view of?process in science education. In J. J. Wellington, Skills?and processes in science education (pp. 115-134).?London: Routledge.?
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.