[논문]자연생태 전망평가체계 마련을 통한 환경영향평가 및 정책 활용방안 고찰

이후승

doi:10.14249/eia.2023.32.5.363

자연생태 전망평가체계 마련을 통한 환경영향평가 및 정책 활용방안 고찰
A Review on Environmental Impact Assessment and Policy Utilization through the Establishment of Ecological Outlook and Evaluation System 원문보기

환경영향평가 = Journal of environmental impact assessment, v.32 no.5, 2023년, pp.363 - 376

이후승 (한국환경연구원 환경평가본부)

초록
AI-Helper

기후변화와 무분별한 개발 등으로 인해 생물다양성의 감소와 멸종 위험이 심각해짐에 따라 자연생태계에 대한 보전의 중요성이 높아지고 있다. 이러한 상황에서 본 연구는 자연자원과 생태계 변화 등에 대한 정보제공을 목적으로 한 평가기반의 자연생태 전망평가체계에 대한 국외 사례를 검토하였다. 결과로서 국외에서는 국내와 유사하게 다양한 조사기관에서 분류군별 조사를 수행하고 있으며 조사된 자료가 통합적으로 수집·관리되고 단기간내 지속적으로 제공되고 있다. 또한 기초조사 자료와 함께 평가기반의 예측·전망 정보를 제공함으로써 국가정책 및 환경영향평가 등에서의 활용도가 높은 것으로 조사되었다. 이를 바탕으로 국내 자연생태 조사 현황과 환경영향평가 등에서의 정보이용의 한계성을 분석하고 자연생태 정책수립 지원 등 정보로서의 자연생태 전망평가체계 작성 필요성에 대해 고찰하였다. 또한 제안된 자연생태 전망평가 등의 다양한 정보를 통해 국내 자연생태계 정책에 효과적으로 활용할 수 있는 정책방향을 제안하였다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

As the risk of biodiversity reduction and extinction becomes serious due to climate change and indiscriminate development, the importance of conservation of the natural environment and ecosystem is increasing. In this situation, Ireviewed that overseas cases of the ecological outlook and evaluation system aimed at providing information on natural resources and ecosystem change. As a results, other countries showed that various research institutes have been carrying on field surveys by classification group, but it was different from us that the investigated data are collected and managed in an integrated manner and repeatedly provided within a short period of time. In addition, it was analyzed that it was highly utilized in policy and environmental impact assessment by providing evaluation-based prediction and outlook information along with basic survey data. Based on this, the limitations of information use in our wildlife surveys and environmental impacts assessments were analyzed, and the estabilishment of a ecology outlook and evaluation system and policy support measures were considered. In addition, based on the proposed outlook and evaluation system preparation plan, a policy direction that can be effectively used in domestic natural ecosystem policies was proposed.

주제어

표/그림 (5)

그림 Figure 1. Limitations of information provision due to analysis of basic status of survey data
표 Table 1. Lists of major wildlife survey programs in Republic of Korea
표 Table 2. Lists of biodiversity monitoring in major countries
표 Table 3. Key considerations for reinforcement expertise
그림 Figure 2. (a) Provision of current basic data, (b) providing complementary information according to the dualization of providers and demanders

참고문헌 (44)

Ahn KH, Shin YK, Kim JY, Lee YK, Lim JC,？Ha JW, Kwon HS, Suh JH, Kim KG. 2015. A review on the public appeals of？the ecosystem and nature map. Journal of？Environmental Impact Assessment, 24(1):？99-109. [Korean Literature]？
Arneth A, Leadley P, Claudet J, Coll M, Rondinini？C, Rounsevell MDA, Shin YJ, Alexander？P, Fuchs R. 2023. Making protected areas？effective for biodiversity, climate and food.？Global Change Biology, 29: 3883-3894.？

상세보기
Audit Scotland. 2021. Environment, Sustainability？and Biodiversity.？
Brauman KA, Daily GC, Duarte TKE, Mooney？HA. 2007. The nature and value of ecosystem？services: an overview highlighting hydrologic？services. Annual Review of Environment？and Resources, 32: 67-98.？
Burkmar R. 2017. Monitoring and indicators of？UK biodiversity change: a review for the？tomorrow's biodiversity project. Field？Studies Council, UK.？
Cha YJ. 2000. Planning and management of urban？ecological park. Nature Conservation. 110:？18-24. [Korean Literature]？
Department for Environment, Food and Rural？Affairs. 2022. UK Biodiversity Indicators.
European Environment Agency. 2012. Streamlining？European biodiversity indicators 2020: building a future on lessons learnt from？the SEBI 2010 process.？
Gilbert G, Gibbons DW, Evans J. 2012. Bird？monitoring methods. RSPB. UK.？
Green EJ, Buchanan GM, Butchart SHM,？Chandler GM, Burgess ND, Hill SLL,？Gregory RD. 2019. Relating characteristics？of global biodiversity targets to reported？progress. Conservation Biology, 33(6):？1360-1369.？
Hu Y, Wang M, Ma T, Huang M, Huang G, Zhou？W, Ping X, Lu Y, Wei F. 2022. Integrated？index-based assessment reveals long-term？conservation progress in implementation of？Convention on Biological Diversity. Science？8: eabj8093.？
JBO. 2010. Japan biodiversity outlook 1 - report？of comprehensive assessment of biodiversity？in Japan. Tokyo: Nature conservation Bureau,？Ministry of the Environment, Government？of Japan.？
Jones GM, Tingley MW. 2021. Pyrodiversity and？biodiversity: a history, synthesis, and outlook.？Diversity and Distributions, 28: 386-403.？
Jun SW, Jung SM. 1998. A study on the remote？exploration techniques for the preparation？and utilization of ecological natural map？- focusing on the preparation of land cover？classification map. Korea Environment？Institute. [Korean Literature]？
Jung TJ, Song IB, Lee JS, Lee SJ, Cho KJ, Song？KH, Kim GD, Cha JR, Cho JS, Lim HS,？Jung HJ. 2017. The analysis on causes of？areas with public appeals to the ecosystem and？nature map. Journal of Korean Environment？Research and Technology, 20(1): 25-34.？[Korean Literature]？
Jung HL, Rho PH, Lee HW. 2007. Ecosystem？survey to improve the efficiency of natural？environment policy establishment. Nature？Conservation, 137: 18-29. [Korean Literature]？
Ko KA, Cha EJ, Lee JH, Kim MJ, Joo WY. 2021. Developing and integrated system？for the comprehensive management of？national biodiversity strategies and action？plans, management indicators, implementation？assessment, and effectiveness assessment. Korea？Environment Institute. [Korean Literature]？
Ko KA, Lee HW, Oh IC, Hong HJ, Kim YJ,？Chun JY, Jung SG. 2018. A study on the？establishment of the 4th national biodiversity？strategy and preparation of the CBD national？report (I). Korea Environment Institute,？Ministry of Environment [Korean Literature]？
Kwon YS, Song KH, Kim MK, Kim KD. 2020. A？study on the data cleaning and standardization？of national ecosystem survey in Korea. Korean？Journal of Ecology and Environment, 53(4):？380-389. [Korean Literature]？
Lee B, Wallis E, Hobern D, Zerger A. 2021. The？Atlas of Living Australia: history, current？state and future directions. Biodiversity？Data Journal, 9: e65023.？

상세보기
Lee HJ, Ha JU, Cha JY, Lee JH, Yoon HN, Jung？CW, Oh HS, Bae SY. 2017. The habitat？classiification of mammals in korea based？on the National Ecosystem Survey. Journal？of Environment Impact Assessment, 26(2):？160-170. [Korean Literature]？
Lee WS, Sagong H, Joo YJ, Ji MK, Jung SG. 2020. Development of ecoinformatics？biodiversity assessment tools (II): utilization？of biodiversity map in policy making. Korea？Environment Institute. [Korean Literature]？
Lee WS, Sagong H, Joo YJ, Jung SG. 2019.？Development of ecoinformatics biodiversity？assessment tools. Korea Environment Institute.？[Korean Literature]？
McGuinness S, Muldoon C, Tierney N, Cummins？S, Murray A, Egan S, Crowe O. 2015.？Bird sensitivity mapping for wind energy？developments and associated infrastructure？in the Republic of Ireland. BirdWater Ireland,？Kilcoole, Wicklow.？
Ministry of the Environment. 2021. JBO3 - 2021？Report of comprehensive assessment of？biodiversity and ecosystem services in Japan.？
National Institute of Biological Resources. 2021.？National Biodiversity Statistics Collection,？Ministry of Environment. [Korean Literature]？
Nature Conservation Bureau. 2002. Living with？nature: the national biodiversity strategy of？Japan. Nature Conservation Bureau, Ministry？of the Environment, Tokyo.？
OEH & CSIRO. 2019. Measuring biodiversity and？ecological integrity in New South Wales:？Method for the biodiversity indicator program.？NSW government, Sydney.？
Ogawa-Onishi Y, Berry PM. 2013. Ecological impacts？of climate change in Japan: the importance of？integrating local and international publications.？Biological Conservation, 157: 361-371.？

상세보기
Oh HY, Han JE, Lee W, Jang HD, Lee JS, Shin？SK, Kang DH, Oh YJ, Lee YH, Bong JM,？Lim JH, Yoo CH, Song SH, Kim WH, Chu？MK, Kim EN, Lee DG, Lee SY. 2022.？Climate change impacts on phylogenetic？diversity: assessment and prediction(2).？National Institute of Biological Resources.？[Korean Literature]？
Park JH, Choi JG. 2018. A study on the？improvement of the EIA items and the？operating system based on the analysis of？EIA items usage. Journal of Environmental？Impact Assessment, 27(1): 1-16. [Korean？Literature]？
Park SC, Han BH, Park MJ, Yun HD, Kim MJ. 2016. A study on the possibility of utilizing？both biotope maps and land cover maps on？the calculation of the ecological network？indicator of city biodiversity index. Journal？of the Korean Institute of Landscape？Architecture, 44(6): 73-83. [Korean Literature]？
Secretariat of the Convention on Biological？Diversity. 2020. Global Biodiversity？Outlook 5. Montreal.？
Segan DB, Murray KA, Watson JEM. 2016. A？global assessment of current and future？biodiversity vulnerability to habitat loss-climate change interactions. Global Ecology？and Conservation 5: 12-21.？

상세보기
Shin YO. 2020. The role of wild animals, mainly？bats, in the emergence of new viruses and？the measures for the prevention. Nature？Conservation. 180: 20-32. [Korean Literature]？
Silvestro D, Goria S, Sterner T, Antonelli A. 2022.？Improving biodiversity protection through？artifial inteligence. Nature Sustainability, 5;？415-424.？
Smith F. 1996. Biological diversity, ecosystem stability？and economic development. Ecological？Economics, 16: 191-203.？
Sobkowiak M. 2022. The making of imperfect？indicators for biodiversity: a case study of？UK biodiversity performance measurement.？Business Strategy and the Environment.？32(1): 336-352.？
Sobkowiak M. 2023. The making of imperfect？indicators for biodiversity: a case study of？UK biodiversity performance measurement.？Business Strategy and the Environment,？32, pp.336-352.？

상세보기
Steffen W, Burbidge AA, Hughes L, Kitching R,？Lindenmayer D, Musgrave W, Stafford SM,？Werner PA. 2009. Australia's biodiversity？and climate change: a strategic assessment of the vulnerability of Australia's biodiversity？to climate change. A report to the Natural？Resource Management Ministerial Council？commissioned by the Australian Government.？CSIRO Publishing.？
Sung SY, Kwon YS, Kim KD. 2018. Development？and applications of ecological data portal？service (EcoBank) for sharing ecological？information of Korea. Korean Journal of？Ecology and Environment, 51(3): 212-220.？[Korean Literature]？
Thompson G, Thompson SA. 2020. A comparison？of an environmental impact assessment (EIA)？vertebrate fauna survey with a post-approval？faunna salvage program: consequences of not？adhering to EIA survey guidelines, a Western？Australian example. Pacific Conservation？Biology, 26(4): 412-419.？
Wood CL, Lafferty KD, DeLeo G, Young HS,？Hudson PJ, Kuris AM. 2014. Does biodiversity？protect humans against infectious disease?？Ecology, 95(4): 817-832.？

상세보기
Yun KS, Shin YH. 2015. The appropriateness and？improvement for grade evaluation system？of geomorphology part, the 3rd natural？environment survey. Journal of the Korean？Geomorphological Association, 22(1): 89-107. [Korean Literature]？

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증