참고문헌 (88)

1. Kang, J. (2016). An analysis of generalization class using GSP for the 8th grade？students in a math gifted class -Focused on Viviani theorem-. Communications of Mathematical Education, 30(1),？23-46. 

2. Kang,？H., & Choi, E. (2023). A study on pre-service teachers' development of digital-based teaching and learning？materials of pi. Education of Primary School Mathematics, 26(1), 65-82. 

3. Ko, S., Park, M., & Han, H. (2013). Teachers' perceptions on process-Focused mathematics？assessment using manipulatives and technological devices. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society,？16(4), 675-694. 

4. Koh, E., & Han, G. (2023). The effect of the elementary school 'smart mathematics exploration？team' support system on mathematical academic achievement and mathematical attitude. Journal of the Korean？Association of information Education, 27(3), 235-243. 

5. Ministry of Education (1992). Mathematics curriculum (#？1992-19). Ministry of Education. 

6. Ministry of Education (2020). A comprehensive plan for mathematics education that grows together and leads？the future with the power of thinking(2020~2024). SeJong: Ministry of Education. 

7. Ministry of Education (2022). Mathematics curriculum？(# 2020-236 supplement 8). Ministry of Education. 

8. Ministry of Education (2022). Mathematics curriculum？(# 2022-33 supplement 8). Ministry of Education. 

9. Kim, M., & Son, H. (2013). The analysis on utilization trend of the technology in secondary mathematics？textbooks based on the 6th, 7th and 2007 revised curriculum in Korea. School Mathematics, 15(4), 975-994. 

10. Kim, S., Kim, M. H., Lee, I., Lee, S., & Paik, H. (2023). OECD programme？for international student assessment: An analysis of PISA 2022 results. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation,？Research Report RRE 2023-10. 

11. Kim,？S. (2010). A study on the using of 'maths with attitude' programs in elementary. Journal of Elementary Mathematics？Education in Korea, 14(1), 153-176. 

12. Kim, S. (2021). Prospective mathematics teachers' perceptions of the use of hands-on？manipulatives and technological tools in teaching quadratic curves. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics？Society, 24(1), 151-172. 

13. Kim, S., & Kim,？H. (2019). A research on mathematics teachers' perceptions of mathematics education. The Mathematical Education,？58(3), 423-442. 

14. Kim, Y., & Shin, B. (2023). An analysis of students' communication in lessons for the geometric？similarity using AlgeoMath. The Korean School Mathematics Society, 26(2), 111-135. 

15. Kim,？H., & Park, S. (2006). An effective approach to utilize prior studies based on using teaching tools. Communications？of Mathematical Education, 20(2), 179-205. 

16. Kim, H. (2019). Computational thinking and？mathematics education. Journal for Philosophy of Mathematics Education, 1(1), 17-28. 

17. Kim, H., Lee, H., Lee, H., Jin, S., Song, M.,？Jung, I., Cho, S., Choi, I., Choi, J., Choi, H., Hong, E., & Hong, C. (2020). AlgeoMath 3rd year development？research report. Seoul: Korea Foundation for the Advancement Science & Creativity. 

18. Noh, E., & Park,？J. (2019). A study on the current status of digital literacy education in secondary mathematics curriculum and？lesson plan. School Mathematics, 21(3), 483-505. 

19. Park, R., Kwon, J., & Lee, D. (2019). The effects of？engineering tools on students' math academic achievement and math learning attitude in middle school？mathematics geometrical unit. Journal of Digital Convergence, 17(12), 67-75. 

20. Park, Y., Kim, C., Lee, C., & Kim, Y. (2020). A study on the analysis of 'organization and interpretation？of data' in the mathematics textbooks for first grade in middle schools. Journal of Research in Curriculum &？Instruction, 24(6), 602-615. 

21. Byun, Y., & Kim, S. (2020). TPACK analysis on self-study of high school mathematics teachers using？technology. School Mathematics, 22(3), 373-394. 

22. Seo, M., & Cho, M. (2023). A study on development and effect of high school mathematics？contents for artificial intelligence(AI) capability. Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And？Instruction, 23(2), 771-790. 

23. Seo, H., & Lee, G. (2021). Comparative study of the effects in using geofix and cabri 3D on folding nets'activities.？The Mathematical Education, 60(2), 159-172. 

24. Son, H. (2011). Trend and？prospect on using technology in mathematics education in Korea. School Mathematics, 13(3), 525-542. 

25. Song, C., & Lee, K. (2023). Understanding the big ideas approach to the mathematics curriculum and exploring？its implementation models. The Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 33(1), 101-122. 

    상세보기

26. Yang, E., & Shin, J. (2015). A genetic decomposition of congruent transformation in dynamic？geometry environments using GSP. The Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 25(4), 499-524. 

27. Yoo, J., Lee, J., Park, M., & Jang, H. (2020). Alternative method of？irrational numbers using approximate fractions and slopes of straight lines in a spreadsheet environment. The？Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 30(2), 353-374. 

28. Lee, K., Kim, S., Kim, N., Lee, M., Cho, S., Jee, Y., Choi, S., Na, G., Do, J., Sun, W., Lee,？J., Lim, M., Choi, J., Tak, B., Rim, H., Kim, B., Na, M., Suh, B., ... Hong, Y. (2022). Research on the development？policy of the 2022 revised mathematics curriculum draft (final draft). Ministry of Education, the Korea Foundation？for the Advancement of Science & Creativity (KOFAC). 

29. Lee, G., Kim, D., Kim, S., Kim, H.,？Kim, H., Park, J., Lee, H., Lee, H., Rim, H., Jang, J., Jung, J., Cho, S., Choi, I., & Song, C. (2021). A study？on the future-oriented mathematics curriculum composition for post-COVID-19. Ministry of Education. 

30. Lee, K., Jung, H., Kang, W., Ahn, B., & Baek, D. (2017). Suggestion and application of didactical？principles for using mathematical teaching aids. Communications of Mathematical Education, 31(2), 203-221. 

31. Lee, U., & Cho, J. (2015). Analysis of transforming mathematical representation shown in the？class of composite function using the CAS. School Mathematics, 17(1), 19-33. 

32. Lee, E., & Cho, J. (2015). A study on mathematics teachers' beliefs about their use technology experiences:？Focused group interviews. The Mathematical Education, 54(2), 99-117. 

33. Lee, J., Lee, T., Kang, G., Kim, S., Park, H., Lee, Y., & Sim, S. (2014). A statistics education？package Tong-Gramy for 5-8 graders. The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics, 27(3), 487-500. 

34. Lee, H. (2019). Exploring the future direction of math education in AlgeoMath. East Asian Mathematical？Journal, 35(4), 387-406. 

35. Yim, Y., & Hong, J. (2016). Primary students' mathematical thinking analysis of between？abstraction of concrete materials and concretization of abstract concepts. School Mathematics, 18(1), 159-173. 

36. Rim, H., & Choi, I. (2019). Exploring the application of robots in mathematics classrooms based on？the Van Hiele levels of development in geometry. School Mathematics, 21(4), 645-668. 

37. Jang, H., & Nam, J. (2021). The use of artificial intelligence in elementary？mathematics education -Focusing on the math class support system "Knock-knock! Math Expedition"-. The？Journal of Korea Elementary Education, 31(5), 105-123. 

38. Jung, S., & Park, M. (2023). Development of an artificial intelligence mathematics convergence？education program tailored to elementary mathematics curriculum. Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education？in Korea, 27(1), 87-108. 

    상세보기

39. Jung, Y. (2015). Teaching？proportional reasoning in elementary school mathematics. The Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics,？25(1), 21-58. 

40. Jung, J., Park, J., Cho, H., Park, J., Jung, J., Na,？M., Lee, H., Mun, J., Kim, K., Shin, S., & Park, J. (2023). Exploring the direction of the comprehensive plan for？science, mathematics, information, and convergence education. Ewha Womans University Future Education？Research Institute. 

41. Jung, H., & Seo, H. (2021). Analyzing how 9th grade students participate in the online mathematics？lessons. School Mathematics, 23(3), 433-456. 

42. Ji, Y.？(2020). Pre-service elementary teacher's statistical knowledge for teaching informal statistical inference. Doctoral？dissertation, Seoul National University. 

43. Choi, G. (2022). A case study on 3D modeling of cultural assets in Korea: Focusing？on the students at S gifted school. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 22(18), 113-131. 

    상세보기

44. Choi, G. (2023). Development and application of teaching and learning materials for middle school quadratic？functions based on smartphone activity. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 23(17),？251-267. 

    상세보기

45. Choi, J. (2023). Data analysis class plan using CODAP for middle school students. The Korean Association？of Computer Education, 27(1), 18. 

46. Hong, O., Kim, J., Kim, H., Rim,？Y., Kim, G., Kim, S., Kim, S., Nam, J., Shin, J., An, S., Lee, Y., Rim, M., Jung, P., & Hwang, G. (2021). A？study on the development and operation of AI elementary mathematics class support system. SeJong: Ministry of？Education. 

47. Whang, W., Lee, J., Kim, D., Shin, J., Lim, W., Park, J., Park, S., Baek,？H., Kim, J., & Cho, S. (2015). A study on the improvement of mathematics textbooks using engineering tools. Seoul:？Korea Foundation for the Advancement Science & Creativity. 

48. Artigue, M. (2002). Learning mathematics in a CAS environment: The genesis of a reflection about instrumentation？and the dialectics between technical and conceptual work. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical？Learning, 7, 245-274. 

49. Beccuti, F., & Robutti, O. (2022). Teaching mathematics in today's society: Didactic paradigms, narratives and citizenship.？For the Learning of Mathematics, 42(2), 29-34. 

50. Bhagat, K. K., & Chang, C. Y. (2015). Incorporating GeoGebra into geometry learning-A lesson from India. Eurasia？Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(1), 77-86. 

51. Boggan, M., Harper, S., & Whitmire, A. (2010). Using manipulatives to teach elementary mathematics. Journal of？Instructional Pedagogies, 3, 1-6. 

52. Bourassa, M. (2020). TECHNOLOGY CORNER: MATHIGON. Gazette-Ontario Association for Mathematics, 58(3), 9-12. 

53. Bray, A., & Tangney, B. (2017). Technology usage in mathematics education research-A systematic review of recent？trends. Computers & Education, 114, 255-273. 

54. Chalmers, C., Carter, M. L., Cooper, T., & Nason, R. (2017). Implementing "big ideas" to advance the teaching and？learning of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). International Journal of Science and？Mathematics Education, 15(1), 25-43. 

55. Chechan, B., Ampadu, E., & Pears, A. (2023). Effect of using Desmos on high school students' understanding and？learning of functions. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(10), em2331. 

    상세보기

56. Common Core State Standards Initiative (2010). Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (CCSSM). Washington？DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and the Council of Chief State School Officers. 

57. Dahal, N., Pant, B. P., Shrestha, I. M., & Manandhar, N. K. (2022). Use of GeoGebra in teaching and learning geometric？transformation in school mathematics. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 16(8), 65-78. 

    상세보기

58. Dvir, M., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2023). Fostering students' informal quantitative estimations of uncertainty through statistical？modeling. Instructional Science, 51(3), 1-28. 

59. Erbas, A. K., & Yenmez, A. A. (2011). The effect of inquiry-based explorations in a dynamic geometry environment？on sixth grade students' achievements in polygons. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2462-2475. 

    상세보기

60. Higgins, T., Mokros, J., Rubin, A., & Sagrans, J. (2023). Students' approaches to exploring relationships between？categorical variables. Teaching Statistics, 45(S1), S52-S66. 

61. Hwang, G. J., & Tu, Y. F. (2021). Roles and research trends of artificial intelligence in mathematics education: A？bibliometric mapping analysis and systematic review. Mathematics, 9(6), 584. 

    상세보기

62. Ivy, J. T., & Franz, D. P. (2013). Two classroom portraits demonstrating the interplay of secondary mathematics teachers'？TPACK on their integration of the mathematical practices. In D. Polly (Ed.), Common core mathematics standards？and implementing digital technologies (Chapter14). IGI Global. 

63. Korenova, L. (2017). GeoGebra in teaching of primary school mathematics. International Journal for Technology in？Mathematics Education, 24(3), 155-160. 

64. Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-575. 

65. Machado, D., Bastos, N., Hall, A., & Pais, S. (2023). Volume of geometric solids on the Desmos platform-A didactic？experience in Cape Verde. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(3), 376-391. 

    상세보기

66. Mollakuqe, V., Rexhepi, S., & Iseni, E. (2020). Incorporating Geogebra into teaching circle properties at high school？level and it's comparison with the classical method of teaching. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics？Education, 16(1), 1-11. 

67. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principle and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author. 

68. Nusir, S., Alsmadi, I., Al-Kabi, M., & Sharadgah, F. (2013). Studying the impact of using multimedia interactive programs？on children's ability to learn basic math skills. E-learning and Digital Media, 10(3), 305-319. 

    상세보기

69. Pea, R. D. (1987). Cognitive technologies for mathematics education. In A. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive science and？mathematics education (pp. 89-122). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 

70. Phillips, A., Pane, J. F., Reumann-Moore, R., & Shenbanjo, O. (2020). Implementing an adaptive intelligent tutoring？system as an instructional supplement. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 1409-1437. 

    상세보기

71. Reinhold, F., Hoch, S., Werner, B., Richter-Gebert, J., & Reiss, K. (2020). Learning fractions with and without educational？technology: What matters for high-achieving and low-achieving students? Learning and Instruction, 65, 101264. 

    상세보기

72. Saidu, S., & Bunyamin, S. (2016). Effects of geoboard and geographical globe on senior secondary school students'？performance in mathematics in Kaduna State. Journal of Science, Technology & Education, 4(1), 140-148. 

73. Salinas-Herrera, J., & Salinas-Hernandez, U. (2022). Teaching and learning the notion of normal distribution using？a digital resource. Canadian Journal of Science. Mathematics and Technology Education, 22(3), 576-590. 

    상세보기

74. Sinclair, N., & Heyd-Metzuyanim, E. (2014). Learning number with TouchCounts: The role of emotions and the body？in mathematical communication. Technology. Knowledge and Learning, 19(1-2), 81-99. 

75. Sinclair, N., & Jackiw, N. (2005). Understanding and projecting ICT trends. In S. Johnston-Wilder, & D. Pimm (Eds.),？Teaching secondary mathematics effectively with technology (pp. 235-252). UK: Open University Press. 

76. Singapore Ministry of Education (2020). Mathematics Syllabuses secondary one to four: Express course normal(academic)？course. Curriculum Planning and Development Division of Singapore. 

77. Smith, R. C., Shin, D., & Kim, S. (2017). Prospective and current secondary mathematics teachers' criteria for evaluating？mathematical cognitive technologies. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology,？48(5), 659-681. 

    상세보기

78. Steenbergen-Hu, S., & Cooper, H. (2013). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems on K-12？students' mathematical learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(4), 970-987. 

    상세보기

79. Suparman, S. (2021). Is cabri 3d software effective for teaching geometry materials? A meta-analysis study in Indonesia.？Journal of Advanced Sciences and Mathematics Education, 1(2), 41-51. 

80. Tamur, M., Juandi, D., & Kusumah, Y. S. (2020). The effectiveness of the application of mathematical software in？Indonesia; A meta-analysis study. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 867-884. 

    상세보기

81. Thompson, P. W., Byerley, C., & Hatfield, N. (2013). A conceptual approach to calculus made possible by technology.？Computers in the Schools, 30(1-2), 124-147. 

82. Trouche, L. (2004). Managing the complexity of human/machine interactions in computerized learning environments:？Guiding students' command process through instrumental orchestrations. International Journal of Computers？for Mathematical Learning, 9(3), 281-307. 

    상세보기

83. Vidergor, H. E., & Ben-Amram, P. (2020). Khan academy effectiveness: The case of math secondary students' perceptions.？Computers & Education, 157, 103985. 

84. Vinner, S. (2002). The role of definitions in the teaching and learning of mathematics. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced？mathematical thinking (pp. 65-81). Springer. 

85. Wagner, D. (2019). Situated mathematics: Positioning mathematics ideas as human ideas. In T. Toh, & J. Yeo, (Eds.),？Big ideas in mathematics: Yearbook 2019, association of mathematics educators (pp. 47-70). World Scientific. 

86. Watson, J., Fitzallen, N., Fielding-Wells, J., & Madden, S. (2018). The practice of statistics. In D. Ben-Zvi, K., Makar,？& J. Gar-field (Eds.), International handbook of research in statistics education (pp. 105-138). Springer. 

87. Wozniak, F. (2017). Task design potential of using an Interactive Whiteboard for implementing inquiry-based learning？in mathematics. In A. Leung, & A. Baccaglini-Frank (Eds), Digital technologies in designing mathematics education？tasks: potential and pitfalls (pp. 41-54). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. 

88. Zulnaidi, H., Oktavika, E., & Hidayat, R. (2020). Effect of use of GeoGebra on achievement of high school mathematics？students. Education and Information Technologies, 25(1), 51-72. 

    상세보기

저자의 다른 논문 :

신보미 (19)