$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

초등 일반 학생과 과학영재 학생의 과학 탐구 학습 지향과 불일치 상황에 대한 대처 전략의 관계 비교
The Relationship between Orientations toward Scientific Inquiry Learning and Coping Strategies for Anomalous Situations in Elementary Students: A Comparison between General and Science-Gifted Students 원문보기

한국과학교육학회지 = Journal of the Korean association for science education, v.44 no.2, 2024년, pp.155 - 166  

윤지영 (서울광진초등학교) ,  강훈식 (서울교육대학교)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

이 연구에서는 초등 일반 학생과 과학영재 학생의 과학 탐구 학습 지향을 조사하여 비교했다. 또한 이들의 과학 탐구 학습 지향과 불일치 상황에 대한 대처 전략의 관련성도 조사하여 비교했다. 이를 위해 서울특별시에서 초등 일반 학생 61명과 과학영재 학생 53명을 선정한 뒤, 과학 탐구 학습 지향을 조사하는 설문과 불일치 상황에 대한 대처 전략을 조사하는 설문을 실시했다. 또한 일부 일반 학생 및 과학영재 학생을 대상으로 반구조화된 심층 면담을 개별로 실시했다. 연구 결과, 학년과 관계없이 과학 탐구 학습 지향 중에서 초등 일반 학생은 '개념이해' 지향이 가장 많이 나타났으며, '과학적 실천' 지향이 두번째로 많이 나타났다. 반면 초등 과학영재 학생은 '과학적 실천' 지향의 빈도가 가장 높았으며, '개념이해'와 '복합' 지향도 비교적 자주 나타났다. '활동' 지향은 일부 일반 학생에게서만 나타났고, '공학적 실천' 지향은 일부 과학영재 학생에게서만 나타났으며, '과정기능' 지향은 나타나지 않았다. 과학 탐구 학습 지향과 불일치 상황에 대한 대처 전략 사이에 명확한 관련성을 확인하지는 못했다. 그러나 같은 과학 탐구 학습 지향을 가진 경우라도 불일치 상황에 대한 대처 전략을 선택하는 양상은 초등 일반 학생과 과학영재 학생 사이에 약간의 차이가 있음을 발견할 수 있었다. 이에 대한 교육적 시사점을 논의했다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

This study investigated and compared orientations toward scientific inquiry learning among general and science-gifted elementary students. It also investigated and compared the relationship between their orientations toward scientific inquiry learning and their coping strategies for anomalous situat...

주제어

#불일치 상황   #과학 탐구 학습 지향   #대처 전략   #초등 과학영재 학생  

표/그림 (5)

참고문헌 (53)

  1. Abd-El-Khalick, F., Boujaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G.,？Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., Niaz, M., Treagust, D., & Tuan,？H. L. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives.？Science Education, 88(3), 397-419. 

  2. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitude and predicting social？behavior. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. 

  3. An, J., & Choi, H. (2018). Responses of university students confronted with？a sustained anomalous situation with a dynamic balance. New Physics:？Sae Mulli, 68(1), 62-70. 

    상세보기

  4. Aydin, S., & Boz, Y. (2013). The nature of integration among PCK？components: A case study of two experienced chemistry teachers.？Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(4), 615-624. 

    상세보기

  5. Aydin, S., Demirdogen, B., Akin, F. N., & Uzuntiryaki-Kondakci, E. (2015).？The nature and development of interaction among components of？pedagogical content knowledge in practicum. Teaching and Teacher？Education, 46, 37-50. 

    상세보기

  6. Betts, G. T. (2004). Fostering autonomous learners through levels of？differentiation. Roeper Review, 26(4), 190-191 

  7. Chae, D., Shin, J., & Kim, E. (2022). Analyzing inquiry activities and？exploring the difficulties of teaching inquiry activities presented in？science textbooks for grades 5-6. Journal of the Korean Society of？Earth Science Education, 15(2), 213-223. 

  8. Cho, E., Choi, C., & Yoon, H. (2023). Pre-service elementary teachers'？orientation toward scientific inquiry teaching: Focusing on the？anomalous situation. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education,？42(2), 211-226. 

  9. Choi, S., Kang, S., & Noh, T. (2008). The influences of cognitive conflict？and situational interest by a discrepant event on the conceptual change？process in learning the concept of combustion. Journal of the Korean？Association for Science Education, 28(8), 779-785. 

  10. Gess-Newsome, J., Taylor, J. A., Carlson, J., Gardner, A. L., Wilson, C.？D., & Stuhlsatz, M. A. (2017). Teacher pedagogical content？knowledge, practice, and student achievement. International Journal of？Science Education, 39(1), 1-20. 

  11. Gul, K, S., & Ates, H. (2017). Science teachers' perceptions toward？discrepant events applied in science education. Asia-Pacific Forum on？Science Learning and Teaching, 18(2), 1-11. 

  12. Han, S., Lee, I., Kang, S., & Noh, T. (2011). An investigation of elementary？school teachers' epistemological beliefs about science on the bases？of their strategies for coping with critical incidents. Journal of Korean？Elementary Science Education, 30(1), 61-70. 

  13. Jang, W., Choi, M., & Hong, H. (2021). Interpretation of discrepant events？through analysis of inquiry activities in textbooks - Focusing on the？discussion of the boiling point measurement experiment -. School？Science Journal, 15(5), 437-452. 

  14. Jegal, M., & Kim, H. (2015). Coping strategy and epistemological belief？of elementary science gifted students 'in real science anomalous？situations. The Journal of the Korean Society for Gifted and Talented,？14(1), 73-96. 

  15. Jho, H., & Song, J. (2011). The observation type of primary students and？the effect of their views of science on observation activity in anomalous？situation. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 30(4),？405-414. 

  16. Ji, S., & Park, J. (2016). The beginning elementary school teachers'？difficulties to suffer in the science classes from the perspective of？content knowledge and teaching method. Journal of Science Education,？40(2), 116-130. 

  17. Jo, S., & Kang, H. (2013). Analyses of elementary science-gifted students'？epistemological beliefs about science through use of anomalous？situations. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education,？33(2), 328-344. 

  18. Jung, S., & Shin, Y. (2023). Analysis of inquiry activities in the field of？life in 5th and 6th grade elementary science authorized textbooks？according to the 2015 revised science curriculum. Biology Education,？51(1), 66-77. 

  19. Kang, H., & Jang, H. (2012). Analyses of elementary school students'？epistemological beliefs through investigation of their coping strategy？types for anomalous situations in science classes students. Journal of？the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(7), 1087-1098. 

  20. Kang, J., & Yoo, B. (2018). The relationship between the cognitive conflict？levels of students facing an anomalous situation including misconception？and a conceptual change in science. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 68(10),？1116-1126. 

    상세보기

  21. Kim, D. (2023). Exploring the use of inconsistent situations in science class？by the level of problem-solving ability in elementary school teachers.？Biology Education, 51(1), 22-34. 

  22. Kim, H., & Choi, S. (2023). Analysis of elementary science textbook inquiry？activities according to the transition to authorized textbooks - Focused？on the unit of 'life cycle of the animal' -. Biology Education, 51(1),？1-10. 

  23. Kim, M., & Park, J. (2015). Students' difficulties to suffer in the classes？on "World of small living things" unit of elementary school science.？Biology Education, 43(3), 240-250. 

  24. Kim, Y., & Yoo, J. (2019). Exploring elementary teachers' difficulties on？teaching science by analyzing questions in an autonomous online？teacher community: Focusing on physics questions in indischool.？Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 39(1), 73-88. 

  25. Ko, Y., You, J., & Kang, H. (2023). Exploration on learning experiences？for improving science academic passion of elementary science-gifted？students. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education,？42(2), 274-286. 

  26. Kwon, H. (2019). Elementary school teachers' difficulties in science classes？and self-efficacy in science teaching: Narrative inquiry of a teacher？in elementary school. Journal of Studies on Schools and Teaching,？4(1), 63-82. 

  27. Lee, D., & Park, J. (2022). Improvement of teachers' scientific knowledge？researched by difficulty and development of teachers experienced in？process of conducting scientific inquiry. Journal of the Korean？Chemical Society, 66(1), 42-49. 

  28. Lee, E., Yun, S., & Kim, H. (2015). Exploring small group argumentation？and epistemological framing of gifted science students as revealed by？the analysis of their responses to anomalous data. Journal of the Korean？Association for Science Education, 35(3), 419-429. 

  29. Lee, H., & Cho, H. (2008). Theoretical review on the meaning and？importance of autonomous inquiries for the gifted in science education.？Journal of Science Education, 2(2), 33-50. 

  30. Lee, J., Shin, S., & Ha, M. (2015). Comparing the structure of secondary？school students' perception of the meaning of "Experiment" in science？and biology. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education,？35(6), 997-1006. 

  31. Lee, S., Jhun, Y., Hong, J., Shin, Y., Choi, J., & Lee, I. (2007). Difficulties？experienced by elementary school teachers in science classes. Journal？of Korean Elementary Science Education, 26(1), 97-107. 

  32. Lee, S., Lee, J., & Park, C. (2019). Latest introduction to gifted education.？Seoul: Hakjisa. 

  33. Lim, A., & Jhun, Y. (2014). An analysis of teachers and students' difficulties？in the classes on 'electric circuit' unit of elementary school science？curriculum. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 33(3),？597-606. 

  34. Lim, S. (2020). Analysis of teaching strategies, types of inquiry activities？and the relationship between inquiry activities and concepts presented？in elementary school science textbooks- focusing on earth science -.？Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 39(3), 449-463. 

  35. Lucero, M., Valcke, M., & Schellens, T. (2013). Teachers' beliefs and？self-reported use of inquiry in science education in public primary？schools. International Journal of Science Education, 35(8), 1407-1423. 

  36. Mason, L. (2003). Personal epistemologies and intentional conceptual？change. In G. M. Sinatra & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual？change (pp. 199-236). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 

  37. Ministry of Education (2015). Science curriculum. MOE Notification No.？2015-74 [supplement 9]. 

  38. Ministry of Education (2022). Science curriculum. MOE Notification No.？2022-33 [supplement 9]. 

  39. Nott, M. & Wellington, J. (1995). Critical incidents in the science classroom？and the nature of science. School Science Review, 76(276), 41-46. 

    상세보기

  40. Park, J. (2022). Analysis of inquiry skills and core competencies reflected？in inquiry activities of authorized elementary school science textbooks.？Biology Education, 50(4), 496-504. 

  41. Park, J., & Yoon, H. (2022). Inquiry of the parallel connection of batteries？by using PhET Simulation: How can simulation help pre-service？elementary teachers to understand anomalous situation?. New Physics:？Sae Mulli, 72(5), 376-389. 

    상세보기

  42. Park, J., Jang, J., & Song, J. (2016). Why did I cope with so?: A teacher's？strategy to cope with anomalous situations in primary practical science？lessons. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 35(3),？277-287. 

  43. Park, K., & Chung, Y. (2018). A case study on pedagogical content？knowledge (PCK) search and instructional practice of two novice high？school science teachers. Journal of Research in Curriculum &？Instruction, 22(5), 293-304. 

  44. Qian, G., & Alvermann, D. (1995). Role of epistemological beliefs and？learned helplessness in secondary school students'learning science？concepts from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2), 282-292. 

    상세보기

  45. Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach.？In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd？ed., pp. 102-119). New York: Macmillan. 

  46. Seo, S., & Kang, H. (2021). Exploration on teaching and learning experiences？improving positive experiences about science of scientifically-gifted？elementary school students. Journal of the Korean Association for？Science Education, 41(2), 133-144. 

  47. Shin, C., & Song, J. (2021). A study on science teaching orientation and？PCK components as they appeared in science lessons by an？experienced elementary teacher: Focusing on 'motion of objects' and？'light and lens'. Journal of the Korean Association for Science？Education, 41(2), 155-169. 

  48. Son, J., Lee, B., Lee, I., Choi, W., Shin, Y., Han, J., & Choi, J. (2009).？Development and Understanding of Identification Tools for Elementary？Science-Gifted Students. Seoul: Bookshill. 

  49. Song, S., & Shim, K. (2020). Analysis on the science subject competencies？in inquiry activity of elementary science textbooks according to 2015？revised national curriculum. Biology Education, 48(1), 1-9. 

  50. Watters, J. J., & Diezmann, C. M. (2003). The gifted student in science:？Fulfilling potential. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 49(3), 46-53. 

  51. Wright, E. L., & Govindarajan, G. (1992). Stirring the biology teaching pot？with discrepant events. The American Biology Teacher, 54(4),？205-210. 

    상세보기

  52. Yoon, H. (2008). Elementary teachers' dilemmas of teaching science？practical work. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education,？27(2), 102-116. 

  53. Yoon, H. (2022). What do pre-service elementary teachers learn from inquiry？into science class dilemmas?. Journal of Korean Elementary Science？Education, 41(2), 338-355. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

FREE

Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로