초록

AI-Helper

이 연구는 과학탐구실험을 진행하는 과정에서 나타나는 상호작용의 변화양상을 분석하여 상호작용의 특성과 상호작용의 변화에 영향을 미치는 요인을 알아보고자 하였다. 이를 위해 1년 동안 13개의 탐구실험활동이 진행되는 동안 교사가 추천한 두 동질모둠을 관찰하면서 녹음/녹화하였다. 40차시의 녹음/녹화자료는 모두 전사되었으며, 자료는 메모하면서 보고 듣는 과정을 반복하는 방법을 기초로 분석하였다. 분석결과 두 동질모둠의 변화방향은 현저히 달랐는데, 모둠 A는 모둠원간 감정대립이 심해 상호작용을 통한 학습이 불가능하게 된 반면, 모둠 B는 상호작용의 수준이 높아지고 있었다. 두 모둠의 상반된 변화는 모둠원의 의견이나 감정을 중재할 수 있는 동료의 존재여부에 의해 가장 크게 영향 받는 것으로 보인다. 전반적으로 볼 때, 학생들은 동료의 의견을 받아 논의하는 방법에 서툴렀고, 보고서 완성을 중시하였으며, 성취도가 낮은 학생이 소외되는 경향이 있었다. 또한 목표를 이해에 두는가, 동료의 의견을 존중하는가, 동료를 배려하는가, 분위기의 중재자가 있는가에 의해 상호작용의 변화방향이 달라지고 있었다. 이로부터 상호작용을 강조한 활동의 진행과 모둠구성에 대한 시사점을 얻을 수 있었으며, 이에 대해 논의하였다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

The purpose of this study was to understand the factors affecting interactions as well as the students' learning process in small group activities. For this purpose, the changes and characteristics of students' interactions in scientific inquiry experiments were analyzed. This study focused on 2 hom...

The purpose of this study was to understand the factors affecting interactions as well as the students' learning process in small group activities. For this purpose, the changes and characteristics of students' interactions in scientific inquiry experiments were analyzed. This study focused on 2 homogeneous small groups of eighth graders. Students were involved in 13 inquiry experiments for one year and students' interactions in each experiments were observed and recorded using video/audio and the data recorded were transcribed. The analysis of data was based on the method of making a note by looking on and listening to the data repeatedly. Changes in the interactions of the two homogeneous groups differ remarkably. In small group A, owing to the conflicts of students' emotions, learning through social interactions became to be impossible. On the other hand, the interactions in small group B became more active. It seems that this changes are affected largely by the existence of peers who are able to mediate different opinions or feelings among group members. In general, middle school students were poor at receiving peers' opinion, cared a lot about writing reports. The less able students tended to be placed at a disadvantageous position in experiment lessons emphasizing social interactions. Four factors that affected the change of interactions were identified: Is the aim of experiments the understanding or completion of report? Is there any attitude towards peers' suggestions? Is there a disposition to care about peers? Is there any peer to mediate on peers' opinions or feelings? Educational implications of the progression of activities emphasizing interactions and the organization of grouping were drawn.

주제어