$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

자연수와 분수 연산에 대한 학생들의 이해 분석
An Analysis of Students' Understanding of Operations with Whole Numbers and Fractions 원문보기

Journal of the Korean Society of Mathematical Education. Series A. The Mathematical Education, v.51 no.1, 2012년, pp.21 - 45  

김경미 (고려대학교 교과교육연구소) ,  황우형 (고려대학교)

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

The purpose of the study was to investigate how students understand each operations with whole numbers and fractions, and the relationship between their knowledge of operations with whole numbers and conceptual understanding of operations on fractions. Researchers categorized students' understanding...

주제어

#범자연수   #분수   #덧셈   #뺄셈   #곱셈   #나눗셈   #이해  

질의응답

핵심어 질문 논문에서 추출한 답변
곱셈적 비교는 어떤 곱셈의 상황인가? 아이들이 가지고 있는 과자는 모두 몇 개입니까?”와 같이 각 묶음에 같은 수를 갖는 여러 묶음을 가지고 있는 상황을 말한다. 곱셈적 비교는 기준이 되는 한 집합의 크기와 다른 집합의 크기를 비교하여, 제시되지 않은 집합의 크기가 기준이 되는 집합 크기의 몇 배가 되는지를 구하는 상황이다. 일반적으로 “~배 만큼”의 단어가 포함된 상황을 의미한다.
Fischbein et. al.(1985)는 곱셈의 직관 모델로 무엇을 제시하였나? al.(1985)은 곱셈의 직관 모델로 ‘반복된 덧셈(Repeated Addition)’을 제시하였으며, 나눗셈은 ‘등분제(Partitive Division)’ 상황과 ‘포함제(Quotative Division)’ 상황으로 나누어 제시하였다.
수학교육에서 이해에 관한 연구를 크게 세 가지로 구분하면? 수학교육에서 이해에 관한 연구는 크게 세 가지로 구분할 수 있다. 학생들이 이해를 더 잘하도록 도울 수 있는 교수학적 자료를 개발하는데 초점을 맞춘 연구와 학생들의 이해를 진단하는데 집중한 연구, 이해의 모델을 보다 이론적으로 구축하는데 초점을 둔 연구로 크게 구분할 수 있다(Sierpinska, 1994). 본 연구는 두 번째 연구 범주에 해당된다.
질의응답 정보가 도움이 되었나요?

참고문헌 (61)

  1. 김경미？황우형 (2009). 분수의 덧셈, 뺄셈에 대한 아동의 이해 분석. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 E , 23(3), 707-734. 

    원문보기 상세보기

  2. 김경미？황우형 (2011). 분수의 곱셈과 나눗셈에 대한 학생의 이해와 문장제 해결의 관련성 분석. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 A , 50(3), 337-356. 

  3. 남승인？서찬숙 (2004). 문제 장면의 모델화를 통한 수업이 곱셈적 사고력과 곱셈 능력 신장에 미치는 영향. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 C , 8(1),33-50. 

    원문보기 상세보기

  4. 이종욱 (2007). 한 초등학교 2학년 아동의 곱셈과 나눗셈 해결 전략에 관한 사례 연구. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 A , 46(2), 155-171. 

  5. 황우형？김경미 (2008). 자연수의 사칙연산에 대한 아동의 이해 분석, 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 A , 47(4), 519-543. 

  6. Amato, S. A. (2005). Developing students' understanding of the concept of fractions as numbers. In H. L. Chick & J. L. Vincent (Eds.),Proceedings 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp.49-56). Melbourne: PME. 

  7. Barmby, P., Harries, T., & Higgins, S. (2009). The array representation and primary children's understanding and reasoning in multiplication. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70, 217-241. 

    상세보기 crossref

  8. Behr, M. J., Wachsmuth, I., Post, T., & Lesh, R. (1984). Order and equivalence of rational numbers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15, 323-341. 

    상세보기 crossref

  9. Biddlecomb, B. D. (2002). Numerical knowledge as enabling and constraining fraction knowledge: an example of the reorganization hypothesis. Journal of Mathematics Behavior, 21, 167-190. 

    상세보기 crossref

  10. Carraher, D. W. (1993). Building rational number concepts upon students' prior understanding. Paper presented at the International Conference on Rational Number Learning, University of Georgia, Athens, GA. 

  11. Cramer, K., & Henry, A. (2002). Using manipulative models to build number sense for addition of fractions. In B. Litwiller & G. Bright (Eds.), Making sense of fractions, rations, and proportions (pp. 41-48). Reston, Virginia: NCTM. 

  12. Davis, G., Hunting, R., & Pearn, D. (1993). What might a fraction mean to a child and would a teacher know? Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 12, 63-76. 

  13. Doerr, H., & Bowers, J. (1999). Revealing pre-service teachers' thinking about functions through concept mapping. In F. Hitt & M. Santos (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting of PME-NA (Vol. 1, pp.364-369). Columbus, OH:ERIC. 

  14. English, L. D., & Halford, G. S. (1995). Mathematics education models and processes. NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 

  15. Fischbein, E., Deri, M., Nello, M. S., & Merino, M. S.(1985). The role of implicit models in solving verbal problems in multiplication and division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16, 3-17. 

    상세보기 crossref

  16. Freudenthal, H. (1983). Didactical phenomenology of mathematical structures. Dordrecht : Reidel Publishing Company. 

  17. Fuson, K. (1992). Research on whole number addition and subtraction. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp.243-275). NY: Macmillan. 

  18. Gray, E. M. (1993). The transition from whole number to fraction: The need for flexible thinking. Paper presented at the International Conference on Rational Number Learning, University of Georgia, Athens, GA. 

  19. Greer, B. (1992). Multiplication and division as models of situations. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp.276-295). NY: Macmillan. 

  20. Hackengerg, A. J. & Tillema, E. S. (2009). Students' whole number multiplicative concepts: A critical constructive resource for fraction composition schemes. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 28, 1-18. 

    상세보기 crossref

  21. Herscovics, N. (1996). The construction of conceptual schemes in mathematics. In L. P. Steffe, P. Nesher, P. Cobb, G. A. Goldin & B. Greer (Eds.), Theories of mathematics learning (pp.351-379). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 

  22. Hiebert, J., & Carpenter, T. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics research and teaching (pp.65-100). NY: MacMillan. 

  23. Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Fuson, K. C., Wearne, D., Murray, H., Olivier, A., & Human, P. (1997). Making sense: teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. 

  24. Huinker, D. (2002). Examining dimensions of fraction operation sense. In B. Litwiller & G. Bright (Eds.), Making sense of fractions, ratios, and proportions (pp.72-78). Reston, VA: NCTM. 

  25. Hunting, R. P. (1986). Rachel's schemes for constructing fraction knowledge. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 17, 49-66. 

    상세보기 crossref

  26. Hunting, R. P., Davis, G., & Pearn, C. A. (1997). The role of whole number knowledge in rational number learning. In F. Biddulph & K. Carr (Eds.), People in mathematics education. Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp.239-246). Rotorua, New Zealand: MERGA. 

  27. Leikin, R., Chazan, D., & Yerushalmy, M. (2001). Understanding teachers' changing approaches to school algebra: Contributions of concept maps as part of clinical interviews. Proceedings of the 25th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp.289-296). Utrecht, Netherlands: Freudenthal Institute. 

  28. Lesh, R., & Landau, M. (1983). Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes. NY: Academic Press. 

  29. Lesh, R., Post, T., & Behr, M. (1987). Representations and translations among representations in mathematics learning and problem solving. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp.33-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 

  30. Mack, N. K. (1990). Learning fractions with understanding: building on informal knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(1), 16-32. 

    상세보기 crossref

  31. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education: Revised and expanded from case study research in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. 

  32. Moss, J., & Case, R. (1999). Developing students'understanding of the rational numbers: A new model and an experimental curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(2), 122-147. 

    상세보기 crossref

  33. Ni, Y., & Zhou, Y. (2005). Teaching and learning fraction and rational numbers: The origins and implications of whole number bias. Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 27-52. 

    상세보기 crossref

  34. Nickerson, R. S. (1985). Understanding understanding. American Journal of Education, 93(2), 201-239. 

    상세보기 crossref

  35. Olive, J. (1999). From fractions to rational numbers of arithmetic: A reorganization hypothesis. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1, 279-314. 

    상세보기 crossref

  36. Pearn, C., & Stephens, M. (2007). Whole number knowledge and number lines help develop fraction concepts. In J. Watson & K. Beswick (Eds.), Mathematics: Essential research, essential practice. Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (Vol. 2, pp.601-610). Hobart, Sydney: MERGA. 

  37. Peled, I., & Segalis, B. (2007). It''s Not Too Late to Conceptualize: Constructing a Generalized Subtraction Schema by Abstracting and Connecting Procedures. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 7(3), 207-230. 

  38. Pirie, S., & Kieren, T. (1994). Growth in mathematical understanding: How can we characterise it and how can we represent it? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26, 165-190. 

    상세보기 crossref

  39. Riley, M., Greeno, J. G., & Heller, J. I. (1983). Development of students' problem-solving ability in arithmetic. In H. P. Ginsberg (Ed.), The development of mathematical thinking (pp.53-196). NY: Academic Press. 

  40. Saenz-Ludlow, A. (2003). A collective chain of signification in conceptualizing fractions. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22, 181-211. 

    상세보기 crossref

  41. Schmittau, J. (1991). A theory-driven inquiry into the conceptual structure of multiplication. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 13(4), 50-64. 

  42. Sharp, J., & Adams, B. (2002). Children' constructions of knowledge for fraction division after solving realistic problems. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(6), 333-347. 

    상세보기 crossref

  43. Siebert, I. (2002). Connecting informal thinking and algorithms: The case of division of fraction. In B. Litwiller & G. Bright (Eds.), Making sense of fractions, ratios, and proportions (pp.247-256). Reston, VA: NCTM. 

  44. Sierpinska, A. (1994). Understanding in mathematics. London, NY: Routledge. 

  45. Sinicrope, R., Mick, H. W., & Kolb, J. R. (2002). Interpretations of fraction division. In B. Litwiller & G. Bright (Eds.), Making sense of fractions, ratios, and proportions (pp.153-161). Reston, VA: NCTM. 

  46. Skemp, R. (1987). The psychology of learning mathematics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 

  47. Slavit, D. (1999). The role of operation sense in transitions from arithmetic to algebraic thought. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 37, 251-274. 

  48. Steffe, L. P. (2004). On the construction of learning trajectories of children: The case of commensurate fractions. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 129-162. 

    상세보기 crossref

  49. Steffe, L. P., & Olive, J. (1993). Children's mathematical learning in computer microworlds. Paper presented at the International Conference on Rational Number Learning, University of Georgia, Athens, GA. 

  50. Streefland, L. (1984). Unmasking N-Distracters as a source of failures in learning fractions. In B. Southwell (Ed.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Sydney: Mathematical Association of New South Wales. 

  51. Streefland, L. (1991). Fractions in realistic mathematics education: A paradigm ofdevelopmental research. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publications. 

  52. Tirosh, D. (2000). Enhancing prospective teachers' knowledge of children's conceptions: The case of division of fractions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(1), 5-25. 

    상세보기 crossref

  53. Tirosh, D., Wilson, J., Graeber, A., & Fischbein, E.(1993). Conceptual adjustments in progressing from whole to rational numbers. Paper presented at the International Conference on Rational Number Learning, University of Georgia, Athens, GA. 

  54. Toluk, Z., & Middleton, J. A. (2004). The development of students's understanding of the quotient: A teaching experiment. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 5(10), Article available online http://www.ex.ac.uk/cimt/ijmtl/ijmenu .htm. 

  55. Vai senstein, A. (2006) . A Look at a Chi ld's Understanding of Mathematical Ideas through His Representations. In Smith, S. Z., & Smith, M. E. (Eds.), Teachers engaged in research: Inquiry into mathematics classrooms, grades pre-K-2 (pp. 95-108). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing. 

  56. Van de Walle, J. (2006). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (6thed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. 

  57. Vinner, S., & Dreyfus, T. (1989). Image and definition for the concept of function. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(4), 356-366. 

    상세보기 crossref

  58. Wilcox, S. K., & Sahloff, M. (1998). Another perspective on concept maps: Empowering students. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 3, 464-469. 

  59. Williams, C. (1998). Using concept maps to access conceptual knowledge of function. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(4), 414-421. 

    상세보기 crossref

  60. Wu, Z. (2001). Multiplying fractions. Teaching Children Mathematics, 8(3), 174-177. 

    상세보기

  61. Yanik, H. B., Helding, B., & Flores, A. (2008). Teaching the concept of unit in measurement interpretation of rational numbers. Elementary Education Online, 7(3), 693-705. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

FREE

Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로