$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

초등학생의 과학, 공학, 기술에 대한 인식 및 과학자, 공학자, 기술자에 대한 이미지 조사
A Study on Elementary Students' Perceptions of Science, Engineering, and Technology and on the Images of Scientists, Engineers, and Technicians 원문보기

한국과학교육학회지 = Journal of the Korean association for science education, v.34 no.8, 2014년, pp.719 - 730  

정진규 (부산대학교) ,  김영민 (부산대학교)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

이 연구의 목적은 초등학생의 과학, 공학, 기술에 대한 인식과 과학자, 공학자, 기술자에 대한 이미지를 조사하는 데 있다. 본 연구에서는 조사도구로 Fralick et al. (2009)의 연구에서 사용된 DAST(Draw a scientist test)를 Draw a scientist at work와 Draw a engineer at work를 수정하고 변형하여 사용하였으며, 경남 G시의 S초등학교 6학년 209명을 대상으로 조사하였다. 연구 결과에 의하면, 초등학생들이 가지고 있는 과학자의 이미지는 선행연구에서 나타난 전형적인 과학자의 이미지와 비슷하였다. 공학자의 대표적인 이미지는 짧은 머리에 안경을 쓰고 있지 않으며 평상복을 입고 일을 하고 있는 형태이다. 그리고 주로 선박, 로봇, 컴퓨터, 비행기를 설계하거나 만드는 모습을 나타내었다. 기술자의 대표적인 이미지는 짧은 머리에 보호 장갑을 끼고 용접용 마스크를 착용하였다. 기술자는 자동차, 로봇 등을 고치거나 렌치, 드라이버, 용접기 등을 이용하여 일하는 모습을 나타내었다. 학생들은 공학과 기술을 학문으로 인식하지 못하는 경향을 나타냈다. 또한, 공학, 기술의 연구 분야, 연구 방법에 대해서도 다양하게 인식하지 못하였다.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

The purpose of this study was to investigate elementary school students' perceptions about science, engineering and technology and their images of scientists, engineers, and technicians. In order to investigate students' images of scientists, engineers, technicians and student's perception of scienc...

주제어

참고문헌 (61)

  1. Ahn, M., & Yu, M. (2012). Comparison of career awareness, the preference for science and stereotypic image of the scientist between the gifted students and non-gifted students in elementary school. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 22(3), 527-550. 

  2. Aikenhead, G. S. (2005). Research into STS science education. Educacion Quimica, 16(3), 384-397. 

  3. Beardslee, D. C., & O'dowd, D. D. (1961). The College-Student Image of the Scientist Scientists are seen as intelligent and hard-working but also as uncultured and not interested in people. Science, 133(3457), 997-1001. 

  4. Brooks, M. (2009). Drawing, visualisation and young children's exploration of "big ideas". International Journal of Science Education, 31(3), 319-341. 

  5. Cakmakci, G., Tosun, O., Turgut, S., Orenler, S., Sengul, K., & Top, G. (2011). Promoting an inclusive image of scientists among students: Towards research evidence-based practice. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(3), 627-655. 

  6. Chambers, D. W. (1983). Stereotypic images of the scientist: The draw-ascientist test. Science Education, 67(2), 255-265. 

  7. Chiang, C., & Guo, C. (1996). A study of the images of the scientist for elementary school children. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, St. Louis, MO. 

  8. Etzioni, A., & Nunn, C. (1974). The public appreciation of science in contemporary America. Daedalus, 103(3), 191-205. 

  9. Farland-Smith, D. (2012). Development and Field Test of the Modified Draw-a-Scientist Test and the Draw-a-Scientist Rubric. School Science and Mathematics, 112(2), 109-116. 

  10. Finson, K. D. (2000). Investigating preservice elementary teachers' self-efficacy relative to self-image as a science teacher. Paper presented at the annual international meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers of Science, Akron, OH. 

  11. Finson, K. D. (2002). Drawing a scientist: What we do and do not know after fifty years of drawings. School Science and Mathematics, 102(7), 335-345. 

  12. Finson, K. D. (2003). Applicability of the DAST-C to the images of scientists drawn by students of different racial groups. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 15(1), 15-26. 

  13. Finson, K. D., Riggs, I. M., & Jesunathadas, J. (1999). The relationship of science teaching self-efficacy and outcome expectancy to the Draw-a-Science-Teacher-Teaching Checklist. Paper presented at the annual international meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers of Science, Austin, TX. 

  14. Finson, K. D., Beaver, J. B., & Crammond, R. L. (1995). Development of a field-test checklist for the draw-a-scientist test. School Science and Mathematics, 95(4), 195-205. 

  15. Finson, K., Riggs, I. M., & Jesunathadas, J. (2000). The Relationship of Science Teaching Self Efficacy and Outcome Expectancy to the Draw-a-Science-Teacher-Teaching Checklist. Paper presented at the annual international meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers of Science, Austin, TX. 

  16. Flick, L. (1990). Scientist in residence program improving children's image of science and scientists. School Science and Mathematics, 90(3), 204-214. 

  17. Fort, D. C., & Varney, H. L. (1989). How students see scientists: Mostly male, mostly white, and mostly benevolent. Science and Children, 26, 8-13. 

  18. Fralick, B., Kearn, J., Thompson, S., & Lyons, J. (2009). How middle schoolers draw engineers and scientists. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18, 60-73. 

  19. Fung, Y. (2002). A comparative study of primary and secondary school students'' images of scientists. Research in Science & Technological Education, 20(2), 199-213. 

  20. Hills, P., & Shallis, M. (1975). Scientists and their images. New Scientist, 67(964), 471-474. 

  21. Huber, R. A., & Burton, C. M. (1995). What the students think scientists look like?. School Science and Mathematics, 95, 371-376. 

  22. Jeon, H., Yeo., S., & Woo, K. (2002) Focusing on gender differences Effects of reading materials about scientists on the attitude toward science and images of scientists. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 22(1), 22-31. 

  23. Karatas, F. O., Micklos, A., & Bodner, G. M. (2011). Sixth-grade students' views of the nature of engineering and images of engineers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(2), 123-135. 

  24. Kim, H., Choi, J., & Jung T. (2000). Impressions of the SET(Scientist-Engineer-Technician): A National Survey Analysis. Journal of Technology Innovation, 8(1), 95-123. 

  25. Kim, H., Park, S., & Kim, Y. (2012). A Comparative study of middle school students' images and perceptions of scientist, technician and engineer. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 32(1), 64-81 

  26. Kim, J., & Cho, B. (2002). Perceptions about science and scientific activity of students in kindergarten and primary school. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 22(3), 617-631. 

  27. Kim, S., Jang, M., & Jeong, J. (2002). The effects of 'MEETING WITH SCIENTISTS' program on the fifth graders' physical images of scientists. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 22(3), 490-498. 

  28. Kim, T., & Jang, M. (2012). Science gifted children's conceptions of a scientist's time sue. The Korean Society for the Gifted and Talented, 11(2), 5-23. 

  29. Knight, M., & Cunningham, C. (2004). Draw an Engineer Test (DAET): Development of a tool to investigate students' ideas about engineers and engineering. In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT. 

  30. Koren, P., & Bar, V. (2009). Pupils' image of 'the scientist'among two communities in Israel: A comparative study. International Journal of science education, 31(18), 2485-2509. 

  31. Kwon, N. (2005). Elementary school students' perceptions of scientist and socio-cultural background towards Science. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education. 24(1), 59-67. 

  32. Lee, C. (2012). Recent trends and dilemma of STEM education in the United States. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 25(4), 101-122. 

  33. Lee, H., & Park, K. (2010). Elementary school students' images of scientists and engineers. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 16(4), 61-82. 

  34. Lee, S., & No, T. (2011). The Development of instructional design model for STEM integrated approach in technology education. Korean Technology Education Association, 11(3), 1-20. 

  35. Lyons, J., & Thompson, S. (2006). Investigating the long-term impact of an engineering-based GK-12 program on students' perceptions of engineering. In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Chicago, Illinois. 

  36. Mansour, N. (2009). Science-Technology-Society (STS): A new paradigm in science education. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 29, 287-297. 

  37. Maoldomhnaigh, M. O., & Hunt, A. (1988). Some factors affecting the image of the scientist drawn by older primary school pupils. Research in Science & Technological Education, 6(2), 159-166. 

  38. MDE (2006). Massachusetts science and Technology/Engineering Curriculum Framework. Massachusetts Department of Education. 

  39. Mead, M., & Metraux, R. (1957). Image of the scientist among high school students: A pilot study. Science, 26, 284-390. 

  40. Moon, D. (2008). The development of pre-Engineering educational program model based on STEM integration approach. Korean Society For Engineering Education, 11(2), 90-101. 

  41. National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education : Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. 

  42. Newton, D., & Newton, L. (1992).Young children''s perceptions of science and the scientist. International Journal of Science Education, 14(3), 331-348. 

  43. Oware, E. A. (2008). Examining elementary students' perceptions of engineers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University. 

  44. Oware, E., Capobianco, B., & Diefes-Dux, H. (2007). Gifted students' perceptions of engineers? A study of students in a summer outreach program. In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Honolulu, HI. 

  45. Park, J., Sim, G., & Yuk, G. (2001). An investigation about science sifted student's perception of the science and scientist. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 11(3), 85-97. 

  46. Rampal, A. (1992). Images of science a studv of school and scientists: Teachers' views. i. characteristics of scientists. Science Education, 76(4), 415-436. 

  47. Rubin, E., & Cohen, A. (2003). The images of scientists and science among Hebrew and Arabic-speaking pre-service teachers in Israel. International Journal of Science Education, 25(7), 821-846 

  48. Schibeci, R. A. (1986). Images of science and scientists and science education. Science Education, 70(2), 139-149. 

  49. Schibeci, R. A., & Sorensen, I. (1983). Elementary school children's perceptions of scientists. School Science and Mathematics, 83(1), 14-20. 

  50. She, H. C. (1998). Gender and grade level differences in Taiwan students' stereotypes of science and scientists. Research in Science & Technological Education, 16(2), 125-135. 

  51. Song, J. W., & Kim, K. S. (1999). How korean students see scientists: the images of the scientist. International Journal of Science Education, 21(9), 957-977. 

  52. Song, J., Pak, S., & Jang, K. (1992). Attitudes of boys and girls in elementary and secondary schools towards science lessons and scientists. Journal of Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 12, 109-118. 

  53. Steinke, J., Lapinski, M. K., Crocker, N., Zietsman-Thomas, A., Williams, Y., Evergreen, S. H., & Kuchibhotla, S. (2007). Assessing media influences on middle school-aged children's perceptions of women in science using the draw-a-scientist test (DAST). Science Communication, 29(1), 35-64. 

  54. Turkmen, H. (2008). Turkish primary students' perceptions about scientist and what factors affecting the image of the scientists. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 4(1), 55-61 

  55. Thompson, S., & Pelt, J. (2005). Measuring the influence of engineer and elementary science teacher collaborations using the draw an engineer instrument. In Proceedings of the association for the education of teachers of science annual conference, Colorado Springs, Colorado. 

  56. Williams, A. (1990). Children's Pictures of scientists. Paper presented at a conference on Publics and Policies for Science. Science Museum, London. 

  57. J. Solomon (1993). Teaching Science, Technology and Society, Buckingham, U.K: Open University Press. 

  58. Yakman, G. (2008). ST ${\Sigma}$ @ M Education: an overview of creating a modelof integrative education. Pupils Attitudes Towards Technology 2006Annual Proceedings, 341-342. 

  59. Yakman, G. & Lee, H. (2012). Exploring the Exemplary STEAM Educationin the U.S. as a Practical Educational Framework for Korea Exploringthe Exemplary STEAM Education in the U.S. as a Practical EducationalFramework for Korea. Journal of the Korean Association for Researchin Science Education, 32(6), 1072-1086. 

  60. Yager, R. E. (1996). Science/technology/society as reform in science education. Albany, NY: SUNY Press. 

  61. Yap, C., Ebert, C., & Lyons, J. (2003). Assessing students' perception of the engineering profession. In South Carolina educators for the practical use of research annual conference, Columbia, SC. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

FREE

Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로