The purpose of this study is to extract fusion-required academic fields and fusion priority based on the various relationship between other academic fields and architecture urban academic fields. Initial set of academic fields were gathered through practical worker-oriented survey (respondents: 254) in related academic fields. Then final set of academic fields (21 fields, 120 subjects) were reclassified through investigation of previous studies and cases of other fusion education. The result of this study is based on the expert survey (respondents: 37). Research finding are as follow, the first is that the sector-1 academic fields (economics, energy and resources, business management, environment, law) had high practical usability, academic relationship, expected effect. So these academic fields could be consider a fusion firstly. The second is that the sector-3 academic fields (electronics, mechanical engineering, medical engineering) had low practical usability, academic relationship, relatively high expected effect. According to this result, sector-3 academic fields could be consider a fusion in mid- and long-term point of view. The last is that the sector-2 academic fields (information and communication technology, human sensibility ergonomics) had low practical usability, intermediate academic relationship, slightly high expected effect. Therefore sector-2 academic fields could be consider a fusion in mid- short-term point of view.
원문 PDF 다운로드
원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다. (원문복사서비스 안내 바로 가기)
DOI 인용 스타일