최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기한국과학교육학회지 = Journal of the Korean association for science education, v.37 no.4, 2017년, pp.637 - 650
It is necessary for undergraduate students whose citizenship reaches a maturity stage to recognize the importance of citizen participation in social issues related to science and technology and to be able to make meaningful use of citizens' rights and responsibilities. Therefore, in order to underst...
핵심어 | 질문 | 논문에서 추출한 답변 |
---|---|---|
내적 효능감의 구성은? | 내적 효능감은 과학기술 관련 사회적 쟁점의 이해에 대한 인식,과학기술 관련 사회적 쟁점 해결을 위한 참여 과정에서 개인 자신에 대한 자신감, 과학기술 관련 사회적 쟁점 해결을 위한 참여 과정에서 개인 자신의 영향력에 대한 자신감과 같은 세 개의 소영역으로 구성되어 있다. 그리고 외적 효능감은 과학기술 관련 사회적 쟁점의 정책 결정 과정에서 개인 자신의 건의에 대한 과학기술 관료의 반응에 대한 인식, 과학기술 관련 사회적 쟁점의 정책 결정 과정에서 개인 자신의 생각에 대한 과학기술 관료의 관심에 대한 인식, 과학기술 관련 사회적 쟁점의 정책 결정 과정에서 개인 자신의 의견과 행동에 대한 정부의 반응에 대한 인식과 같은 세 개 소영역으로 구성되어 있다. | |
새로운 과학기술의 등장이 사회적 문화⋅윤리와 상충을 일으킬 수밖에 없는 이유는? | 원자력 발전, 기후변화, 광우병, 유전자조작식품, 인간배아복제 등을 둘러싼 일반 시민들의 위험 인식과 광범위한 불만은 과학기술에 대한 사회의 불안을 보여주는 대표적인 사례들이다. 즉, 새로운 과학기술의 등장은 사회적 문화⋅윤리와 상충을 일으킬 수밖에 없는데, 이는 과학기술이 가져올 긍정적인 측면과 부정적인 측면을 확실하게 예측하기 어렵기 때문이다(Song, 2009, 2011). 그러므로 과학기술이 지니고 있는 긍정적인 측면을 최대화하고, 부정적인 측면을 최소화하여 갈등을 해소하기 위한 사회적 관리 방안 마련이 중요한 과제로 부각되었다(Andersen & Jager, 1999; Moon, 2009; Park, 2004). | |
과학기술과 사회의 관계를 둘러싼 불안이 커지는 이유는? | 그런데 과학기술이 사회에 미치는 영향력이 커질수록 과학기술과 사회의 관계를 둘러싼 불안도 함께 커지고 있다(Kim, 2003; Lee,2002). 첨단 과학기술의 개발과 확산은 시민 사회에 다양한 사회적⋅윤리적 갈등을 유발하고 있기 때문이다. 원자력 발전, 기후변화, 광우병, 유전자조작식품, 인간배아복제 등을 둘러싼 일반 시민들의 위험 인식과 광범위한 불만은 과학기술에 대한 사회의 불안을 보여주는 대표적인 사례들이다. |
Ahn, K., & Kim, N. (2009). A study of neo-institutionalism for governmental policy reflection of the citizen participation: Focus on the consensus conference of bio-tech industry in Korea and Denmark. Korean Policy Science Review, 13(2), 145-174.
Aikenhead, G. S., Fleming, R. W., & Ryan, A. G. (1987). High-school graduates' beliefs about science-technology-society: Methods and issues in monitoring student views. Science Education, 71(2), 145-161.
Aikenhead, G. S., & Ryan, A. G. (1992). The development of a new instrument: Views on science-technology-society(VOSTS). Science Education, 76(5), 477-491.
Andersen, I. E., & Jager, B. (1999). Scenario workshops and consensus conferences: Towards more democratic decision-making. Science and Public Policy, 26(5), 331-340.
Autor, D. (2015). Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3), 3-30.
Banks, M. (1999). Teaching strategies for the social studies: Decision-making and citizen action. New York: Longman.
Barnes, S., Kaase, M., Allerback, K. R., Farah, B., Heunks, F., Inglehart, R., Jennings, M. K., Klingemann, H. D., Marsh, A., & Rosenmayr, L. (1979). Political action: Mass participation in five western democracies. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Beierle, T. C., & Cayford, J. (2002). Democracy in practice: Public participation in environmental decisions. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
Bowman, D. M., & Hodge, G. A. (2007). Nanotechnology and public interest dialogue: Some international observations. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 27(2), 118-132.
Burgess, J., & Chilvers, J. (2006). Upping the ante: A conceptual framework for designing and evaluating participatory technology assessments. Science and Public Policy, 33(10), 713-728.
Bybee, R. (1997). Toward an understanding of scientific literacy. In W. Graber & C. Bolte (Ed.), Scientific Literacy, (pp. 37-68). Kiel: IPN.
Cha, Y. (1993). Nonparametric statistics using SPSS/PC+. Seoul: Free Academy.
Choi, G. (2014). Artificial intelligence: Disruptive innovation and evolution of the internet platform. Research Report of Korea Information Society Development Institute.
Choi, Y. (1999). US science and technology systems and policies. Research Report of Science and Technology Policy Institute.
Fleming, R. W. (1985). Student reasoning in socio-scientific issues: Implications for instruction. In R. Bybee (Ed.), Science-Technology- Society. Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.
Gabriele, A. (2007). Citizen involvement in public policy-making: Does it improve democratic legitimacy and accountability? The case of PTA. Interdisciplinary Information Sciences, 13(1), 103-116.
Goldstein, B., & Dyson, L. (2013). Beyond transparency: Open data and the future of civic innovation. San Francisco, CA: America Press.
Hong, S. (2006). Possibility of new governance in science and technology policy: Lighting of civic participatory programs. Korea Policy Research, 6(1), 109-124.
Jamison, A. (2006). Social movements and science: Cultural appropriations of cognitive praxis. Science as Culture, 15(1), 45-59.
Jang, H., & Chung, Y. (2009). An analysis of informal reasoning in the context of socio-scientific decision-making. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 29(2), 253-266.
Jang, Y., & Han, J. (2008). Development plan of citizen participatory science and technology policy. Research Report of Science and Technology Policy Institute.
Jang, Y., Seoung, J., & Lee, M. (2007). Research and analysis of trends in science and technology policy by region: Analysis of cases of science and technology innovation governance in major countries. Research Report of Science and Technology Policy Institute.
Jasanoff, S. (2003). Technologies of humility: Citizen participation in governing science. Minerva, 41(3), 223-244.
Jeong, B., & Sohn, H. (2008). Science.technology and the political paradigm of civil society: A search for an alternative possibility of the science shops in Korea. Journal of Asia-Pacific Studies, 15(2), 217-235.
Joo, C. (2010). Policy process citizen participation type, cognitive legitimacy and long tail politics. Journal of Local Government Studies, 22(4), 363-379.
Ju, J. (2010). The effects of scientific technological issue-centered discussion on scientific technological citizenship. Doctoral thesis by Graduate School of Seoul National University.
Kang, C. (2012). An analysis of the present condition and character for cultured education in Korean universities. The Korea Educational Review, 18(2), 83-107.
Kang, S., Yoon, J., Kim, B., Kim, S., & Lee, G. (2016). A study on the institutional plan for the contribution of scientists and technologists to social progress. Research Report of the Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity.
Kang, S., Han, S., Kim, J., & Noh, T. (2001). Preservice elementary school teachers' views on relationship between science/technology and society. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 21(3), 537-546.
Kim, B. (2003). A search for the concept of technology assessment: A historical approach. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 6(3), 306-327.
Kim, S., & Park, H. (2013). College students' understanding of nature of science: Discipline and gender difference. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 13(6), 239-256.
Kleinman, D. L. (2000). Science, technology and democracy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Kleinman, D. L. (2005). Science and technology in society: From biotechnology to the Internet. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
Lee, S. (2005). Science shop: New social practice of technologists. Conference Report of Korea Institute of Science and Technology.
Lee, Y. (2000). Sociology of science and technology. Paju: Hanul Publishing.
Lee, Y. (2002). Science and technology, environment, citizen participation. Paju: Hanul Publishing.
Lee, Y. (2014). Disaster citizenship for improving social responsiveness. Research Report of Science and Technology Policy Institute.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Moon, G. (2009). A study on the improvement for social participation according to the uncertainty of science technology. Crisisonomy, 5(1), 59-72.
Morrel, M. E. (1998). Broadening horizons: Can participation make better citizens? A dissertation for degree doctor of philosophy, Arizona State University.
Park, G., & Yoo, M. (2013). The effects of 'science history based chemist inquiry program' on the understanding toward nature of science, scientific attitudes, and science career orientation of scientifically gifted high school students. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 57(6), 821-829.
Park, J. (2004). The history and the role of citizens' organizations in science and technology. Science and Technology Research, 4(1), 111-140.
Parry, G., Moyser, G., & Day, N. (1992). Political participation and democracy in Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2000). Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 25(1), 3-29.
Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2004). Evaluating public participation exercises: A research agenda. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 29(4), 512-556.
Rubba, P. A., Schoneweg, C., & Harkness, W. J. (1996). A new scoring procedure for the views on science-technology-society instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 18(4), 387-400.
Ryu, K., & Jung, J. (2015). Research and analysis of present status of university general education in Korea. Journal of Research in Education, 28(2), 61-83.
Song, S. (2009). Exploring science and technology culture: When science and technology meet. Paju: Hanul Publishing.
Song, S. (2011). Transition of science and culture policy: From science popularization to citizen participation. Research Report of Science and Technology Policy Institute
Song, W. (2003). A study on the change of science and technology decision making process: Searching for new model. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 6(2), 159-174.
UBS (2016). Extreme automation and connectivity: The global, regional, and investment implications of the fourth industrial revolution. White Paper for the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2016.
Yang, C., Lee, J., & Noh, T. (2012). An analysis of the STS content in the elementary science textbooks developed under the 2007 revised national curriculum. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 31(2), 154-163.
Yoo, J., Han, M., Im, H., Ahn, B., & Hwang, G. (2010). The current status and tasks of technology assessment in Korea. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 13(4), 617-637.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.