$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

가정과수업에서 실천적추론수업의 학생성취에 대한 효과성 연구의 메타분석
Revisited meta-analysis of the effects of practical reasoning instruction on students' achievements in Home Economics classes 원문보기

韓國 家政科敎育學會誌 = Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, v.30 no.3, 2018년, pp.151 - 173  

유난숙 (전남대학교 가정교육과, 생활과학연구소)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

본 연구의 목적은 가정과수업에서 실천적추론수업을 적용하여 학생성취에 대한 효과를 살펴본 선행연구들을 양적으로 메타분석함으로써 효과크기를 알아보고, 실천적추론수업의 효과가 어떤 변수에 따라 달라지는 지 분석하는 데 있다. 분석대상의 기준에 맞는 선행연구를 검색한 결과, 1999년부터 2018년까지 수행된 34개 연구가 선정되었다. Becker(1988)가 제안한 방법을 이용하여 사례수를 고려한 표준화된 평균변화로부터 효과크기를 계산한 결과, 34개 분석대상 연구로부터 44개의 효과크기가 산출되었다. 분석에 앞서 출판여부에 따른 오류를 깔대기 기법을 이용하여 평가한 결과, 오류는 없었으며 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 동질성검증 결과, 랜덤 효과 모형을 적용하였으며 실천적추론수업은 전통적 수업에 비해 학생성취에 통계적으로 의미있게 효과적인 것으로 나타났다(효과크기=0.60, SE=.074). 둘째, 조절변인을 찾기 위해 범주형 변수 및 연속형 변수 자료분석을 실행한 결과, 실천적추론수업의 효과성에 대한 선행연구들이 다룬 내용 영역과 학교소재지에 따라 효과크기가 다른 것으로 나타났다. 반면, 출판여부, 연구설계 방법, 분석대상 연도, 학교급, 연구대상자들의 성별, 학생성취의 종류, 수업시수 등에 따라서는 효과크기가 다르지 않았다.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

The purposes of this study was to identify the magnitude and direction of the effects of Practical Reasoning Instruction (PRI) on students' achievements in Home Economics classes using the meta-analysis method and to examine whether the effects of PRI vary across publication status, study design, ye...

주제어

AI 본문요약
AI-Helper 아이콘 AI-Helper

* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.

문제 정의

  • 나아가 본 연구의 초점은 실천적추론수업에 대한 학생성취의 효과가 얼마나 되는지 그 효과크기를 계산하는 것으로, 실험군의 평균변화와 통제군의 평균변화의 차이가 효과크기(Δtc)이다.
  • 여기서 가정과수업 이란 초등학교 실과, 중등학교 기술·가정에서 가정 영역을 다룬 수업을 말한다. 본 메타분석 결과는 실천적추론수업에 대한 더 많은 연구와 보다 효과적인 적용을 하기 위한 기초자료를 제공 하는 데 있다.
  • 본 연구의 목적은 가정과수업에서 실천적추론수업을 적용하여 학생성취에 대한 효과를 살펴본 선행연구들을 양적으로 메타분석을 하여 실천적추론수업이 얼마나 효과적이며, 어떤 변수에 따라 그 효과가 달라지는지 분석하는 데 있다. 분석대상의 기준에 맞는 선행연구를 검색한 결과, 1999년부터 2018년까지 수행된 34개 연구가 선정되었다.
  • 본 연구의 목적은 가정과수업에서 학생성취를 향상하기 위해 실천적추론수업을 적용한 선행연구들을 메타분석함으로써 실천적추론수업의 효과크기를 통해 실천적추론수업이 학생성취에 얼마나 효과적인지 알아보고, 실천적추론수업의 효과가 어떤 변수에 따라 달라지는지 분석하는 데 있다. 여기서 가정과수업 이란 초등학교 실과, 중등학교 기술·가정에서 가정 영역을 다룬 수업을 말한다.
  • 본 연구에서는 실천적추론수업의 효과성을 양적으로 확인하였지만, 질적 연구방법을 통해서도 실천적추론수업의 장점과 탁월성을 확인한 연구들이 있다(Han, 2014; Lee & Yoo, 2008; Yu, 2009). 이 연구들에서는 실천적추론수업의 장점들이 확인된 반면, 실제 수업에의 적용이 어려운 점도 있기 때문에 이를 해결하기 위해 구체적인 연수프로그램에 대한 시사점을 언급하였다.
본문요약 정보가 도움이 되었나요?

질의응답

핵심어 질문 논문에서 추출한 답변
가정학의 사명은? 가정학의 사명은 가족으로 하여금 개별 단위로서, 사회적 기관으로서 행동체계를 구축하고 유지하도록 함으로써, 개인의 자아형성을 성숙하게 하고 사회적 목표와 그것을 성취하기 위한 수단을 비판하고 형성하는 데 깨어서 협동적으로 참여하도록 하게 하는 것이다(Brown & Paolucci, 1979). 따라서 가정과 교육은 가정학의 사명을 교육을 통해서 이루는 역할을 해야 한다.
가정과수업에서 실천적추론수업을 적용하여 학생성취에 대한 효과를 살펴본 선행연구들을 양적으로 메타분석을 하여 실천적추론수업이 얼마나 효과적이며, 어떤 변수에 따라 그 효과가 달라지는지 분석한 본 연구의 결과와 해석은? 첫째, 동질성검증 결과, 랜덤효과 모형을 적용하였으며 실천적추론수업은 전통적 수업에 비해 학생성취에 통계적으로 의미 있게 효과적인 것으로 나타났다(효과크기=0.60, SE=.074). 이 효과크기의 척도는 표준편차 단위이므로, 전통적 수업보다 실천적추론수업이 표준편차의 0.6배 정도 효과가 있는 것으로 해석할 수 있다. 이는 본 연구와 동일한 계산방법을 사용한 N. Yu(2012)의 효과크기 0.60과 유사한 값으로 나와 실천적추론 수업의 효과성이 일관되게 나타난다는 것을 알 수 있다. 한편, 실천적추론수업을 포함하여 다양한 수업모형을 적용한 선행연구를 메타분석한 Choi(2008)에서 중간정도의 효과(0.61)가 나와 본 연구의 전체 효과크기의 수치와 비슷하지만, Choi(2008)는 본 연구에서 사용한 효과크기 계산방법과 다른 Cohen의 효과크기를 사용하였기 때문에 본 연구에서 나온 효과크기와 직접 비교할 수 없다. 참고로, Cohen의 효과크기 계산방법은 실험 집단과 통제집단의 사후검사 평균 점수의 차이를 통제집단의 표준편차로 나누어 도출한 것으로 효과크기가 0.2인 경우 작은 효과, 0.5 정도면 중간 효과, 0.8 이상이면 큰 효과라고 본다 (Cohen, 1988). 본 연구에서는 실천적추론수업의 효과성을 양적으로 확인하였지만, 질적 연구방법을 통해서도 실천적추론수업의 장점과 탁월성을 확인한 연구들이 있다(Han, 2014; Lee & Yoo, 2008; Yu, 2009). 이 연구들에서는 실천적추론수업의 장점들이 확인된 반면, 실제 수업에의 적용이 어려운 점도 있기 때문에 이를 해결하기 위해 구체적인 연수프로그램에 대한 시사점을 언급하였다. 둘째, 실천적추론수업의 학생성취에 대한 효과가 어떤 변수에 따라 달라지는지 알아보기 위해 범주형 및 연속형 변수 분석 결과, 실천적추론수업의 효과성을 살펴본 선행연구들이 다룬 내용 영역과 학교소재지에 따라 효과크기가 다른 것으로 나타났다. 반면, 학술지 게재여부, 연구설계 방법, 분석대상 연도, 연구대상자들의 성별, 학생성취의 종류, 수업시수 등에 따라서는 효과크기가 다르지 않았다. 이는 학술지 게재여부, 연구설계 방법이 단일집단사전사후 평가인지, 이질집단사전사후 평가인지, 분석대상 연도가 2009년 이전인지 2010년 이후인지, 연구 대상자들이 남녀 또는 공학인지, 학생성취의 종류가 정의적, 지적, 실천적 영역인지, 수업시수가 2시간인지 33시간인지 상관없이 실천적추론수업의 효과가 일관성있게 있다는 것을 의미한다. 이는 학교급, 학교급과 수업시수를 상호작용한 변수에 따라 효과크기가 다르게 나타난 N. Yu(2012)의 결과와 다소 상이하다.
실천적 행동 교수모형이란? 실천적 행동 교수모형은 일상생활에서 접하는 실천적 문제를 해결하는 과정에 중심을 둔 수업 방식으로 실천적 문제에 직면 했을 때 최선의 결론을 내리기 위한 사고 과정인 실천적 추론을 포함한 문제 해결 방법이 사용된다(Laster, 1982). 실천적 추론 과정을 거쳐 의사결정을 하게 되면 바람직한 행동을 실천하고 평가하게 되는데 실천적 행동 교수모형은 이 모든 과정을 포함 하며, 실천적 행동 교수모형의 모든 과정에서 가장 핵심적인 단계는 실천적추론 단계이다.
질의응답 정보가 도움이 되었나요?

참고문헌 (97)

  1. Bae, J. -Y. (2018). The effects of practical problem-based Home Economics instruction on creativity of middle school students focusing on the content element of 'clothing management and recycle'. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea National University of Education, Chungbuk, Korea. 

  2. Becker, B. J. (1988). Synthesizing standardized mean-change measures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 41, 257-278. 

  3. Becker, B. J. (2000). Multivariate meta-analysis. In H. E. A. Tinsley & S. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of applied and multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling (pp. 499-525). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. 499-525. 

  4. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons. 

  5. Brown, M. M. (1978). A conceptual scheme and decision-rules for the selection and organization of home economics curriculum content. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction. 

  6. Brown, M. M., & Paolucci, B. (1979). Home economics: A definition. Washington, DC: American Home Economics Association. 

  7. Byun, H. (1999). The effect of practical reasoning instruction in Home Economics of the critical thinking: Family relations and resource management. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea National University of Education, Chungbuk, Korea. 

  8. Byun, H., & Chae, J. (2002). The effect of practical reasoning instruction in Home Economics on the critical thinking: Focusing on family relations and resource management. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 14(3), 1-9. 

  9. Chae, J. (1999). The effects of practical reasoning instruction in Home Economics and other factors on Korean high school female students' decision making skills. Journal of Korean Home Economics Association, 37(3), 43-61. 

  10. Chae, J., Park, M., Kim, S., & Han, J. (2010). Introduction to Home Economics education. Gyeonggi: Kyomunsa. 

  11. Chae, J., & Yoo, T. (2006). The effects of practical reasoning Home Economics instruction on middle school students' self-esteem. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 18(1), 31-47. 

  12. Chae, J., Yoo, T., Park, M., & Lee, J. (2003). The effects of practical reasoning Home Economics instruction on morality of middle school students. Journal of Korean Home Economics Association, 41(12), 53-68. 

  13. Chang, H. -K. (1994). Lesson plan development for "Human development and family relationship" part based on Marjorie Brown's Home Economics curriculum model. Unpublished master's thesis, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea. 

  14. Cho, H. -J. (1999). A study of teaching based on Practical Problems solving on the area of food habits in middle school Home Economics. Unpublished master's thesis, Chungang University, Seoul, Korea. 

  15. Cho, H. -J., & Ahn, S. (2000). A study of teaching based on Practical Problems solving on the area of food habits in middle school Home Economics. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 12(2), 29-45. 

  16. Cho, H. -J., & Lee, G. (2004). The analysis and the effect of the Practical Problem Solving method of the clothings chapter in middle school Home Economics and Technology in the 7thcurriculum. The Secondary Education Research, 52(2), 385-417. 

  17. Choi, J. (2008). Meta-analysis on the effects of the problem solving instruction in the Practical Arts (Technology, Home Economics) education. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 14(4), 283-302. 

  18. Choi, S. (2010). A development and evaluation of Practical Problem-based lesson plans with multiple intelligence: Focused on the unit 'Nutrition & meals' of Home Economics in middle school. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea National University of Education, Chungbuk, Korea. 

  19. Choi, S.-Y., & Chae, J.-Y. (2011). A development and evaluation of practical problem-based Home Economics lesson plans applying to multiple intelligence teaching-learning strategy: Focused on the unit 'Nutrition & Meals' of middle Home Economics subject matter. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 23(1), 87-111. 

  20. Choi, Y. (2002). The effects of Practical Reasoning study on problem solving ability in Home Economics. Unpublished master's thesis, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea. 

  21. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nded.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 

  22. Cooper, H. (1998). Synthesizing research: A guide for literature reviews (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 

  23. Doh, N. (1997). Lesson plans applying a practical problem solving model on the personal development and family relations in junior high schools' home economics. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea National University of Education, Chungbuk, Korea. 

  24. Egger, M., Davey, S. G., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315, 629-634. 

  25. Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5, 3-8. 

  26. Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. 

  27. Han, J. (2014). Experiences of the teachers and students in the practical problem based Home Economics class. Korea National University of Education, Chungbuk, Korea. 

  28. Hedges, L. V. & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press. 

  29. Hedges, L. V., & Stook, W. (1983). The effects of class size: An examination of rival hypotheses. American Educational Research Journal, 20, 63-85. 

  30. Jackson, G. (1980). Methods for integrative reviews. Review of Educational Research, 50, 438-484. 

  31. Jung, S. J. (2014). The effect of practical problem-focused teaching-learning of unit 'understanding of family' in middle school Technology and Home Economics on improvement of students' perspective on health family. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea National University of Education, Chungbuk, Korea. 

  32. Kang, K. (2010). The development and application of Practical Problem-based lesson plan on consumer choice of genetically modified food: Focused on the 'dietary life' unit in high school Home Economics. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea National University of Education, Chungbuk, Korea. 

  33. Kang, K., & Kim, Y. (2010). The development and application of Practical Problem-based lesson plan on consumer choice of genetically modified food: Focused on the 'dietary life' unit in high school Home Economics. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 22(2), 101-113. 

  34. Kim, E. (2009). Developing and implementing Practical Problem Based lesson plan to improve self-leadership skills: focused on the unit of 'Youth's self management' in middle school Technology & Home Economics. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea University, Seoul, Korea. 

  35. Kim, E. -S. (2010). Development and application of Home Economics teaching-learning plan for the improvement of gender equity awareness and family life among middle school student. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea National University of Education, Chungbuk, Korea. 

  36. Kim, E.-S., & Cho, B. E. (2010). The application of a practical problem-based lesson plan for the 'Understanding myself and my family' unit th heighten awareness of gender-role equity degree of participation in household chores. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 22(3), 77-94. 

  37. Kim, H. (2004). The development and application of web-based Practical Problem-Solving learning lesson plan: The case of the adolescent nutrition and diet unit in middle school technical and home economics class. Unpublished master's Thesis, Korea National University of Education, Chungbuk, Korea. 

  38. Kim, J. S. (2007). Development and application of food life education program based on practical problem-solving approach. Unpublished master's thesis, Kyungnam University, Kyungnam, Korea 

  39. Kim, J. -W. (2007). Development, application and assessment of Practical Problem-based instruction for the food & nutrition field in middle school Technology & Home Economics: Compared with competency-based instruction. Unpublished master's thesis, Seoul National University, Korea. 

  40. Kim, S. -E. (2007). The effect of Practical Problem Solving study in Food and Nutrition area on elementary school student's critical thinking disposition. Unpublished master's thesis, Cheongju National University of Education, Chungbuk, Korea. 

  41. Kim, S. -H. (2006). The differences in adolescents' decision making abilities according to the level of critical thinking in terms of practical problem-based instruction of Home Economics. Unpublished master's thesis, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea. 

  42. Kim, S. -H., & Jang, Y. -O. (2007). The differences in adolescents' decision making abilities according to the level of critical thinking in terms of practical problem-based instruction of Home Economics. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 19(1), 133-148. 

  43. Kim, M. -J. (2013). Development and application of practical problem-focused teaching-learning plan for helping teenagers' healthy friendship. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea National University of Education, Chungbuk, Korea. 

  44. Kim, M. S. (2010). The development and application of teaching-learning process plans for cultivating awareness of the secondary school student's LOHAS (Lifestyles of Health and Sustainability): Focused on 'choice and control of clothing'. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea National University of Education, Chungbuk, Korea. 

  45. Kim, M. S., & Lee, H. J. (2010). The development and application of teaching-learning process plans for raising awareness of the secondary school student's LOHAS(Lifestyles of Health and Sustainability) -Focused on the unit of 'the choice and maintenance of clothing' in Technology-Home Economics-. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 22(1), 51-65. 

  46. Kim, Y.-N. (2009). The development and application of practical problem-focused teaching-learning process plans on the elderly housing in high school technology-Home Economics. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea National University of Education, Chungbuk, Korea. 

  47. Kim, Y. -S. (2010). The effect of library assisted Practical Problem-Based Home Economics instruction on student's consciousness and attitude of 'life and career planning'. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea University, Seoul, Korea. 

  48. Kim, Y. -N., & Cho, J. (2009). The Development and Application of Practical Problem Focused Teaching-Learning process plan for the later life: in high school Technology & Home Economics. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 22(1), 1-19. 

  49. Kim, S. -H., & Jang, Y. (2007). The differences in adolescents' decision making abilities according to the level of critical thinking in terms of practical problem-based instruction of Home Economics. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 19(1), 133-148. 

  50. Kim, E., & Lee, Y. (2009). Developing and implementing Practical Problem Based lesson plan to improve self-leadership skills: focused on the unit of 'Youth's self management' in middle school Technology & Home Economics. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 21(4), 35-54. 

  51. Kim, Y. -S., & Lee, Y. (2010). The effect of library assisted Practical Problem-Based Home Economics instruction on student's consciousness and attitude of 'life and career planning'. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 22(2), 61-79. 

  52. Kister, J. Laurenson, S., & Boggs, H. (1995). Family relations resource guide. Work and Family Life Program. Ohio Department of Education. 

  53. Ko, M. -J. (2012). The effects of green food education program based on practical problem solutions on the dietary attitudes of elementary school students. Unpublished master's thesis, Gyeongin National University of Education, Gyeonggi, Korea. 

  54. Ko, M.-J., & Kim, Y. H. (2012). The effects of green food education program based on the practical problem solutions to the dietary attitudes of elementary school students. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 25(2), 151-172. 

  55. Koo, S. -H(2009). Developing of graphic organizer and practical problem-based teaching-learning process plans for constructing a unit on the Home Economics textbook in a middle school: The case of a unit 'the menu and selecting food' on 8 grade of Technology and Home Economics. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea National University of Education, Chungbuk, Korea. 

  56. Laster, J. F. (1982). A practical action teaching model. Journal of Home Economics, 74(3), 41-44. 

  57. Lee, D. H. (2010). Effect of practical problem solving instruction on problem solving ability and dietary self-efficacy: Centering on the field of food and nutrition area of practical arts education. Unpublished master's thesis, Chuncheon National University of Education, Gangwon, Korea. 

  58. Lee, D., & Yang, J. (2010). Effects of Practical Problem Solving Instruction on problem solving ability and dietary self-efficacy: Centering on the unit of food and nutrition of Practical Arts Education. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 23(1), 73-94. 

  59. Lee, G. (2010). Practical problem-focused instructional design applying universal design concept and effects: Focusing on 'Designing my home'. Unpublished master's thesis, Gyeongsang National University, Kyungnam, Korea. 

  60. Lee, H. (1999). The effects of Practical Reasoning Instruction in Home Economics on high school female students' creativity. Unpublished master's thesis, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea. 

  61. Lee, Jin-Hee (2008). Development and evaluation of Practical Problem-based Home Economics teaching-learning process plans by blended learning strategy: the case of a unit 'The youth and consumer life'. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea National University of Education, Chungbuk, Korea. 

  62. Lee, Jin-Hee & Chae, J. -H. (2008). Development of practical problem-based Home Economics teaching learning process plans by blended learning strategy: Focusing on a unit 'the youth and consumer life'. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 20(4), 19-42. 

  63. Lee, Ji-Hyun. (2010). Effects of practical problem solving study on the environmental literacy of elementary school students: The case of a unit 'My environment-friendly life' in Practical Arts. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea National University of Education, Chungbuk, Korea. 

  64. Lee, J. H. (2011). Development of practical problem-focused teaching plan for 'family life in old age' unit and its effect on teenagers' 'preparation for successful aging': Cooperative study between students in academic and those in vocational high schools. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea National University of Education, Chungbuk, Korea. 

  65. Lee, J. H., & Cho, B. E. (2011). The effect of Home Economic education teaching plans for students in academic and those in vocational high schools' 'preparation for successful aging' in the 'family life in old age' unit: A comparative study between practical problem-teaching lesson plans and instructor-led teaching and learning plans. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 23(4), 105-124. 

  66. Lee, J. H., & Choi, J. (2011). Effects of practical problem solving instruction on the environmental Literacy of elementary schol students: the case of a unit 'my environment-friendly life' in practical Arts. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 24(1), 55-80. 

  67. Lee, G., & Jang, S. (2010). Practical Problem-Focused instructional design and its perception applying universal design. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 22(2), 155-169. 

  68. Lee, S. -H., & Yoo, T. -M.(2008). Focus group interview for the development of an in-service educational program on the practical problem focused Home Economics curriculum. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 20(3), 1-23. 

  69. Leucht, S., Kissling, W., & Davis, J. M. (2009). How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 119(6), 443-450. 

  70. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Applied Social Research Methods Series (Vol. 49). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. 

  71. Moon, S. (1999). The effect of Practical Reasoning Instruction applied to food and nutrition units on female high school student's morality. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea National University of Education, Chungbuk, Korea. 

  72. Moon, S., & Chae, J. (2001). The effect of Practical Reasoning Home Economics instruction applied to food and nutrition units on female high school student's morality. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 13(3), 119-130. 

  73. Park, M. R. (2010). Application and development of teachimg-learning plan for 'sustainable residence created with neighbor'. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea National University of Education, Chungbuk, Korea. 

  74. Park, M., & Cho, J. (2010). Application and development of teachimg-learning plan for 'sustainable residence created with neighbor'. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 22(3), 1-18. 

  75. Park, S. (2009). Development and application of teaching program for the 'Being parents' segment of high school Technology & Home Economics: focusing on practical inference instruction. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea National University of Education. 

  76. Park, S., & Cho, B. (2009). The application and effectiveness of a Practical Reasoning model of teaching and learning curriculum for the 'Parenthood' unit in high school Technology & Home Economics. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 21(2), 187-202. 

  77. Pillemer, D., & Light, R. (1980). Synthesizing outcomes: How to use research evidence from many studies. Harvard Educational Review, 50(2), 176-195. 

  78. Pyun, E. (2009). The development of the teaching-learning process plans based on practical problem with motive induction strategy for 'Nutrition and meal of youth' unit. Unpublished master's thesis, Ewha Womans University. 

  79. Ryu, S. (2007a). Effect of Practical Reasoning teaching strategy on elementary school students' problem solving action in Practical Arts instruction. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 20(2), 75-87. 

  80. Ryu, S. (2007b). Effect of Practical Reasoning Practical Arts instruction on elementary school students' problem solving action and ethical action. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 20(4), 1-16. 

  81. Shin, H.-S., & Choi, Y.-M. (2003). The effect of practical reasoning study on problem solving ability in Home Economics. Journal of Human Ecology, 13, 36-47. 

  82. Song, E. S. (2007). Effect of nature dying instruction based on Practical Problem Solving on Elemenraty school student's achievement motivation. Unpublished master's thesis, Cheongju National University of Education, Chungbuk, Korea. 

  83. Song, E. S., & Cho, J. (2017). Practical problem-based teaching. learning process plan to develop and apply to enhance safety awareness in middle school students. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 29(1), 15-33. 

  84. Song, E. M. (2016). Practical, problem-based teaching-learning process to develop, apply, and enhance a sense of safety in middle school aged students. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea National University of Education, Chungbuk, Korea. 

  85. Song, M. (2003). The effect of the ICT teaching method by ICT instructional environment on learning the unit of 'Understanding of myself and family' in middle school Home Economics. Unpublished master's thesis, Gyeongsang National University, Kyungnam, Korea. 

  86. Sung. E. (2000). Developing the curriculum by adapting the practical problem solving instruction model on the clothes purchasing chapter in middle school's home economics. Unpublished master's thesis, Seoul National University. 

  87. Woo, Y.-S. (2018). A Study of development and application of a practical problem-based teaching-learning process for housing life with the neighborhood. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea National University of Education, Chungbuk, Korea. 

  88. Yoo, T. -M.. & Lee, H. -S. (2009). Effects of Practical Reasoning Instruction on Problem Solving Ability. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 21(2), 203-215. 

  89. Yoo, T. & Lee S. H.(2014). A critical review of Korean Home Economics education research based on a critical science perspective. International Journal of Human Ecology, 15(1), 23-37. 

  90. Yoon, B. (1997). The effects of Practical Problem-Based Home Economics instruction on both female and male high school students. Unpublished master's thesis, Ewha Womans University. 

  91. Yoon, B. & Chae, J. (1998). Effects of Practical Problem-Based Home Economics instruction perceived by both female and male high school students. Journal of Korean Home Economics Association, 36(5), 151-166. 

  92. Yu, G. -H.(2004). Case work study through the application of practical problem-solving process. Unpublished master's thesis, Gangwon National University, Gangwon, Korea. 

  93. Yu, J. H. (2012). Development of practical problem based teaching-learning plans of a unit 'Youth's self Management' and evaluation of its effectiveness in middle school Technology-Home Economics: Focused on middle school students' self efficacy, ego resilience and happiness. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea University, Seoul, Korea. 

  94. Yu, J. H., & Lee, Y. S. (2013). Development of practical problem based teaching-learning plans and evaluation of its effectiveness on middle school students' self efficacy, ego resilience and happiness: Focused on the unit 'Youth's self management' in middle school Technology.Home Economics. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 25(4), 79-98. 

  95. Yu, N. S. (2009). Home Economics teacher's reflection on Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Home Economics education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Korea National University of Education, Chungbuk, Korea. 

  96. Yu, N. S. (2012). Meta-analysis of the effect of practical reasoning instruction on student outcome in Home Economics education in Korea. Asia Pacific Education Review, 13(4), 649-664. 

  97. Yuk, S. H. (2010). Nurturing critical literacy through practical problem based instruction: Based instruction for the food nutrition field in high school education Home Economics Science. Unpublished master's thesis, Seoul National University, Korea. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로