$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

간호대학생의 시뮬레이션기반 교육 시 구조화된 디브리핑 유형이 학습성과에 미치는 효과
Effect of Structured Debriefing on the Learning Outcomes of Nursing Students in Simulation-based Education 원문보기

한국정보통신학회논문지 = Journal of the Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering, v.22 no.9, 2018년, pp.1208 - 1213  

최소은 (Department of Nursing, The Research Institute of Women, Mokpo National University) ,  김현주 (Department of Nursing, Catholic University of Pusan)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

시뮬레이션 교육 시 구조화된 디브리핑 유형이 간호대학생의 학습몰입, 비판적사고성향과 임상수행능력에 미치는 효과를 검증하고자 시도된 비동등성 대조군 사후 시차설계의 유사실험 연구이다. 연구대상자는 P 대학교 간호학과 4학년 학생으로, 실험군 22명, 비교군 24명, 대조군 20명으로 총 66명이었다. 실험군에게는 LCJR 질문을 이용한 구조화된 비디오 디브리핑, 비교군은 구조화된 구두 디브리핑, 대조군은 구조화된 그룹 토론 디브리핑을 실시하였다. 연구결과 학습몰입과 비판적사고성향 및 임상수행능력은 세 군간 유의한 차이가 없었으나 사전-사후 차이 검정시 모두 향상되었다. 또한 임상수행능력의 세부영역 중 계획과 중재는 실험군이 다른 두 군에 비해 유의하게 향상되었다. 이를 통해 LCJR의 임상판단 루브릭을 활용한 디브리핑은 시뮬레이션교육에 효과적이며 특히 비디오를 활용한 구조화된 디브리핑 유형은 임상수행능력을 높이는데 영향을 끼치는 것으로 나타났다.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

The study investigates how the structured debriefing method affects the learning flow, critical thinking disposition, and clinical performance of nursing students, using the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR). Nursing students in the 4th grade of P University were divided into three groups, eac...

주제어

AI 본문요약
AI-Helper 아이콘 AI-Helper

* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.

제안 방법

  • Based on the clinical performance evaluation tool of the spinal surgery patient simulation presented by the Korea Nursing Evaluation Institute, the checklist developed by the present researcher was used to assess the clinical skills suitable for the situations of scenario I and scenario II. Cronbach's alpha in this study is.
  • The researchers developed a gastric resection surgery (scenario I) and spinal surgery patient care (scenario II) and clinical performance checklist. Before the simulation was run, the purpose of the simulation, the learning objectives, the related core nursing skills, demonstrations, and autonomous exercises were carried out in the pre-briefing session.
  • 2) statistical program. The general characteristics of the participants were presented as frequency, percentage, mean and standard deviation. The chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were used for the general characteristics and the homogeneity test of the preliminary data.
  • The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of debriefing using the structured debriefing method of lasater on the clinical judgment rubrics and to compare the effectiveness of simulation education to improve the critical thinking disposition of nursing college students, and to provide a basis for empirical.
  • The first period was assigned to the control group (consisting of 20 students), the second period to the comparative group (consisting of 24 students), and the third period to the experimental group (consisting of 22 students). The researchers developed a gastric resection surgery (scenario I) and spinal surgery patient care (scenario II) and clinical performance checklist. Before the simulation was run, the purpose of the simulation, the learning objectives, the related core nursing skills, demonstrations, and autonomous exercises were carried out in the pre-briefing session.
  • The structured debriefing using the clinical judgment rubric was carried out in four stages of cognition, interpretation, reaction and reflection. In the cognitive domain 'What you found', in the interpretation domain, ‘What kind of link is there?’ and ‘Does the response area provide the required nursing intervention?, in the reaction domain ,'Do you provide the required nursing intervention?', in the reflection domain, 'What do you think about the outcome of judgment?' etc, use the debriefing progress question and self- assessment.

대상 데이터

  • Sixty-six nursing students from P University, in the fourth year of the program, understood and agreed on the purpose of the study. The first period was assigned to the control group (consisting of 20 students), the second period to the comparative group (consisting of 24 students), and the third period to the experimental group (consisting of 22 students).

데이터처리

  • The chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were used for the general characteristics and the homogeneity test of the preliminary data. Differences in pre- and post-training effects were analyzed by one way ANOVA.

이론/모형

  • This is a score measured using the Yoon’s critical thinking disposition measurement tool developed by Yoon [3], comprising 27 items.
본문요약 정보가 도움이 되었나요?

참고문헌 (15)

  1. E. H. Kim, "The relationship between clinical stress, fatigue, satisfaction and self-efficacy in clinical practice of nursing students," Journal of The Korea Socity of Health Informatics and Statistics, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 24-36, Feb. 2015. 

  2. Y. Y. Hwang, S. H. Kim, and M. S. Chu, "Developing course outcome to achieve exit outcome : applying hauenstein's theory," Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 155-167, May. 2015. 

  3. J. Yoon, "Development of an instrument for the measurement of critical thinking disposition: in nursing," Unpublished master's thesis, Catholic university, Seoul, Korea, 2004. 

  4. K. Lasater, "Clinical judgement: the last frontier for evaluation," Nurse Education in Practice, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 86-92, Mar. 2011. 

  5. Y. Eun, and S. Y. Bang, "Effects of the lasater's clinical rubric of debriefing in advanced cardiovascular life support training," The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 516-527, Apr. 2016. 

  6. M. O. Kim, A. K. Lee, and H. A. Nam, "Effects on nursing students' learning flow, critical judgement, and problem solving ability in simulation training: focused on obstetrical nursing case," Learner-Centered Curriculum Education Research, vol. 17, no. 24, pp. 521-534, Dec. 2017. 

  7. H. J. Kim, "Effects of a simulation-based debriefing using video in nursing education," Information, vol. 20, no. 8a, pp. 5509-5514, Aug. 2017. 

  8. H. J. Klein, M. J. Wesson, J. R. Hollenbeck, P. M. Wright, and R. P. Deshon, "The assessment of goal commitment : a measurement model meta-analysis," Organization Behavior and Human Decision Process, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 32-55, May. 2001. 

  9. E. H. Choi, and Y. K. Kwang, "Nursing students' problem solving, and clinical competence between standard patient and high fidelity simulator simulation," Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 29-36, Feb. 2015. 

  10. K. H. Choi, G. Y. Kim, Y. T. Shin, and J. B. Kim, "A study on the performance simulation model for estimating hardware scale," International Journal of Control and Automation, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 405-410, Oct. 2014. 

  11. Y. G. Ha, "The effects of debriefing utilizing the clinical judgment rubric on nursing students' clinical judgment, knowledge and self-confidence," Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Seoul national university, Seoul, 2014. 

  12. A. L. Sabei, D. Sulaiman, and K. Lasater, "Simulation debriefing for clinical judgment development: a concept analysis," Nurse Education Today, vol. 45, pp. Oct. 42-47, 2016. 

  13. H. K. Oh, "Effects on nursing students' clinical judgment, communication, and skill performance following debriefing using a clinical judgment rubric," International Journal of Bio-Science and Bio-Technology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 303-312, Feb. 2016. 

  14. K. Lasater, "High-fidelity simulation and the development of clinical judgment: students' experiences," Journal of Nursing Education, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 269-276, Jun. 2007. 

  15. K. Lasater, "Clinical judgment development; using simulation to create an assessment rubric," Journal of Nursing Education, vol. 46, no. 11, pp. 496-503, Nov. 2007. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

GOLD

오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로