최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기정보교육학회논문지 = Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education, v.23 no.5, 2019년, pp.451 - 459
Various policies have been implemented for human resources development in preparation for future society. Among the policies, STEAM education, SMART education and SW education are representative examples. In order for these policies to be implemented effectively in the school setting, teachers' posi...
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
핵심어 | 질문 | 논문에서 추출한 답변 |
---|---|---|
SW교육 정책의 목표는 무엇인가? | 한편, SMART교육 정책은 스마트 테크놀로지가 발달하고 사회 전반에 영향을 주게 됨에 따라서 창의력, 문제해결력 등과 같은 학습자 역량을 강화하기 위하여 교육 환경, 내용, 방법, 평가 등 교육 체제를 혁신하는 것을 목표로 한다[17][25]. 이와 더불어서, SW교육 정책은 소프트웨어가 새로운 부가가치를 창출하는 제4차 산업혁명 시대와 소프트웨어중심 사회로의 이행이 가속화됨에 따라서 미래사회에서 살아가는데 필요한 컴퓨팅 사고력을 기반으로 문제를 해결하는 역량의 신장을 목표로 한다[15][16][23]. | |
교육 분야에 도입된 3가지 혁신 정책들의 실태는 어떠한가? | 그렇다면 위의 세 가지 정책들에 대한 실태는 어떠한가를 살펴볼 필요가 있다. 먼저, STEAM교육의 경우에는, 2009 개정 교육과정에서 융합과학이라는 교과가 도입된 이후 학교 현장에 도입된 지 10년 정도가 되었으나, 여전히 안정적으로 정착되지 못하였다는 지적들이 있다(예: 김성기 외[13], 이만재, 권순희[19]). 이와 더불어서, SMART교육 정책이 발표된 후 여러 해가 지났는데도 기술적인 면을 중심으로 정책이 추진되면서 SMART교육은 단순히 스마트기기를 활용한 수업으로 인식되어 그 정체성의 혼란을 겪고 있다[36]. 가장 최근에 발표되어 추진되고 있는 SW교육의 경우에도 교사의 SW교육에 대한 이해 수준이 낮고, 실천하고자 하는 의지가 부족하며, 지도 역량이 부족하다는 등의 문제들이 다수의 연구들을 통해 지적되었다[14][18]. | |
SMART교육의 정의는 무엇인가? | 교육과학기술부[25]는 또한 2011년에 ‘인재대국으로 가는 길: SMART교육 추진전략 실행계획’을 발표하고, SMART교육을 “21세기 학습자 역량 강화를 위한 지능형 맞춤 학습체제로 교육환경, 교육내용, 교육방법 및 평가 등 교육체제를 혁신하는 동력”(p.5)으로 정의하였다. |
Baek, B., & Sung, Y.(2011). An analysis of determinant factors on teachers' beliefs and attitudes. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 28(3), 101-125.
Bang, J.(2017). A study on the homo eruditio reformatting affecting future education. The Journal of Future Education, 7(1), 25-36.
Chae, H., & Noh, S. (2014). Research articles : Analysis of teachers' stages of concern and levels of use on STEAM of the 2009 elementary science curriculum. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 33(4), 634-645.
Geum, Y., & Bae, S.(2012). The recognition and needs of elementary school teachers about STEAM education. The Journal of Korean Institute of Industrial Education, 37(2), 57-75.
Han, H.(2018). The effects of mentoring experience in STEAM classes on pre-service mathematics teachers' teaching competency for STEAM education. Communications of Mathematical Education. 32(1), 1-22.
Heo, H.O., Lim, K.Y., Lee, H.W., & Kim, H.J.(2014). A needs analysis of teacher competencies for smart education. Korean Journal of Teacher Education, 30(1), 93-112.
Hwang, D., Gil, Y., & Lee, G.(2017). An analysis of educational needs of smart educational competencies of pre-service teachers in University of Education. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 30(3), 17-32.
Jo, S.Y., & Cho, K.R. (2012). A study on the diffusion and adoption of e-Learning among elementary school teachers: Based on Rogers' theory of diffusion of innovation. Journal of Educational Technology, 28(2), 409-438.
Kim, H., & Jun, S.(2017). Elementary teacher perceptions of evaluation methods about suitability and usefulness in software education. Journal of The Korea Association of Information Education, 21(3), 267-275.
Kim, H., & Jun, S.(2019). Importance-performance analysis of tasks and policies of elementary school teachers for SW education. The Journal of Educational Information and Media. 25(1), 151-170.
Kim, K.(2016). A recognition of an analysis of elementary teachers for software education of 2015 revised version of Korean curriculum. Journal of The Korea Association of Information Education, 20(1), 47-56.
Kim, M., & Kim, S.(2017). Early childhood teachers' perception of STEAM and activation measures for STEAM. Journal of Korean Child Care and Education, 13(5), 65-91.
Kim, S., Ha, M., Kim, S., & Paik, S.(2018). Analysis of the structural perceptions of secondary school teachers on the convergence education based on Rogers' innovative attributes. Journal of Education & Culture, 24(5), 179-196.
Korea Education and Research Information Service(2017). The Analysis of Current Status and Effects of 2017 Software Education Research-schools.
Korea Education and Research Information Service(2018). The Analysis of Current Status and Effects of 2018 Software Education Research-schools.
Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity(2018). Research on the Development of Software Curriculum Guideline for the National University of Education.
Kwon, S. H., Lee, J., Han, S. Y., Koo, Y. M., Han, I. S., Bhang, S. H., & Park, S. A. (2014). Teachers perception on smart education: based on the analysis of importance and performance. Educational Method, 26(1), 65-89.
Lee, C., & Ohn, J.(2017). Elementary school teachers' perception towards software education. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 30(4), 179-203.
Lee, M., & Kwon, S.(2017). Teacher's perception analysis of STEAM education policy: implications for convergence education. Educational Research, 69, 121-161.
Lim, S.H., & Jo, M.(2016). Elementary teachers' perception on policies related to ICT for future education. Journal of The Korea Association of Information Education, 20(2), 121-130.
Ministry of Education(2015). Guideline for the Implementation of Software Education.
Ministry of Education(2018). Project Plan to Support Software Education for all Elementary Teachers.
Ministry of Education, & Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning(2015). Plan for Human Resource Development for Software-Oriented Society.
Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2010). Future Korea Led by Creative Human Resource and Advanced Scientific Technology.
Ministry of Education, Science and Technology(2011). Road to Powerful Nation for Human Resource Development: Action Strategies of Smart Education.
Park, S.Y., Kim, J.H., & Lim, K. (2012). Effects of teachers' personal backgrounds and understandings on attitudes towards smart education. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 15(5), 43-53.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations(5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
Ryu, M., & Han, S.(2018). Comparison of information teachers' perceptions about computational thinking. The Journal of Education, 38(2), 1-19.
Seol, M. G., & Son, C. I. (2012). A survey on teacher's perceptional about the current state of using smart learning in elementary schools. Journal of The Korean Association of information Education, 16(3), 309-318.
Shin, Y., & Han, S.(2011). A study of the elementary school teachers' perception in STEAM education. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 30(4), 514-523.
Shin, Y., Han, S., Kim, H., & On, J.(2012). Development of Curriculum in National University of Education for STEAM Education. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology & Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity.
Sim, J., Park, H., & Jeong, J.(2018). An investigation of teachers' STEAM education implementation using the concerns based adoption model. Teacher Education Research, 57(3), 325-340.
Son, Y., Jung, S., Kwon, S., Kim, H., & Kim, D. (2012). Analysis of prospective and in-service teachers' awareness of STEAM convergent education. Institute For Humanities and Social Sciences, 13(1), 255-284.
Son, Y., & Kim, O.(2018). Moderating effects of personal innovativeness on the innovation acceptance intention(smart device utilization for classes): based on Rogers innovation attributes. Korean Journal of Teacher Education, 34(1), 97-119.
Song, M., & Chung, H.(2017). Comparisons of the perceptions on software education between software experts and regular elementary teachers. Journal of Research in Curriculum & Instruction, 21(5), 488-497.
Yun, G., Lee, H., & Park, I.(2017). A study on the defined and realized attributes of SMART education. The Korea Educational Review, 23(1), 183-204.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
출판사/학술단체 등이 한시적으로 특별한 프로모션 또는 일정기간 경과 후 접근을 허용하여, 출판사/학술단체 등의 사이트에서 이용 가능한 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.