최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기대한후두음성언어의학회지 = Journal of the Korean Society of Laryngology, Phoniatrics and Logopedics, v.31 no.2, 2020년, pp.71 - 77
김선우 (성균관대학교 의과대학 강북삼성병원 이비인후과학교실) , 김소연 (성균관대학교 의과대학 강북삼성병원 이비인후과학교실) , 조재경 (성균관대학교 의과대학 강북삼성병원 이비인후과학교실) , 진성민 (성균관대학교 의과대학 강북삼성병원 이비인후과학교실) , 이상혁 (성균관대학교 의과대학 강북삼성병원 이비인후과학교실)
Background and Objectives OperaVOXTM (Oxford Wave Research Ltd.) is a portable voice analysis software package designed for use with iOS devices. As a relatively cheap, portable and easily accessible form of acoustic analysis, OperaVOXTM may be more clinically useful than laboratory-based software i...
* AI 자동 식별 결과로 적합하지 않은 문장이 있을 수 있으니, 이용에 유의하시기 바랍니다.
Kim J, Choi HS. Comparison of clinicians' perceptual evaluations and patients' subjective evaluations of voice disorders. Commun Sci Disord 2009;14(2):223-35.
Rubin AD, Praneetvatakul V, Gherson S, Moyer CA, Sataloff RT. Laryngeal hyperfunction during whispering: reality or myth? J Voice 2006;20(1):121-7.
Yu P, Ouaknine M, Revis J, Giovanni A. Objective voice analysis for dysphonic patients: a multiparametric protocol including acoustic and aerodynamic measurements. J Voice 2001;15(4):529-42.
Jin SM. Introduction of acoustic analysis of voice. Korean J Otolaryngol 2004;47(10):943-9.
Maryn Y, Roy N, De Bodt M, Van Cauwenberge P, Corthals P. Acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: a meta-analysis. J Acoust Soc Am 2009;126(5):2619-34.
Siau RTK, Goswamy J, Jones S, Khwaja S. Is OperaVOX a clinically useful tool for the assessment of voice in a general ENT clinic? BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord 2017;17:4.
Hah JH, Sim S, An SY, Sung MW, Choi HG. Evaluation of the prevalence of and factors associated with laryngeal diseases among the general population. Laryngoscope 2015;125(11):2536-42.
Byeon HK, Han JH, Choi BI, Hwang HJ, Kim JH, Choi HS. Treatment of hemorrhagic vocal polyps by pulsed dye laser-assisted laryngomicrosurgery. Biomed Res Int 2015;2015:820654.
Oguz H, Kilic MA, SAFAK MA. Comparison of results in two acoustic analysis programs: Praat and MDVP. Turk J Med Sci 2011;41(5):835-41.
Shim S, Kim H, Kim J, Shin J. Difference in voice parameters of MDVP and Praat programs according to severity of voice disorders in vocal nodule. Phonetics and Speech Sciences 2014;6(2):107-14.
Yoo JY, Jeong OR, Jang TY, Ko DH. A correlation study among acoustic parameters of MDVP, Praat, and Dr. Speech. Speech Sciences 2003;10(3):29-36.
Vogel AP, Rosen KM, Morgan AT, Reilly S. Comparability of modern recording devices for speech analysis: smartphone, landline, laptop, and hard disc recorder. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2014;66(6):244-50.
Carding PN, Wilson JA, MacKenzie K, Deary IJ. Measuring voice outcomes: state of the science review. J Laryngol Otol 2009;123(8):823-9.
Brockmann-Bauser M, Drinnan MJ. Routine acoustic voice analysis: time to think again? Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011;19(3):165-70.
Wang JH, Park SK, Lee SK, Choi SH, Kim SY, Nam SY. Comparison of the results of voice handicap index and computer-assisted voice analysis in patients with benign vocal cord lesions before and after microlaryngeal surgery. Korean J Otolaryngol 2005;48(3):380-6.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.