최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기Journal of the Korean Society of Mathematical Education. Series C : Education of primary school mathematics, v.23 no.1, 2020년, pp.27 - 44
서보억 (충남대학교)
In this study, we extracted geometrical learning content that is treated similarly in elementary and middle schools, and analyzed the differences between how this study is handled in elementary and middle schools. The analysis tools used in this study were developed by referring to the research resu...
핵심어 | 질문 | 논문에서 추출한 답변 |
---|---|---|
교육 과정에 관한 Bruner의 주장은 어떤 이론을 근간으로 하고있나? | ’라는 주장을 펼친다. 이러한 주장은 Piaget의 준비성(readiness)과 대비되는 조기준비성으로 EIS이론을 근간으로 하고 있다. 이러한 조기준비성으로 인해 표현(Representation)양식은 서로 다르지만, 본질적으로는 같은 내용을 가르칠 수 있게 되었다. | |
수행수준이란? | 먼저, 수행수준은 ‘학생이 어떤 수준에서 학습한 내용을 사용할 수 있어야 하는가?’와 관련된 것으로 학습결과로 학습자가 획득한 능력에 대한 행동 수준이다(Suh, Lee & Han, 2017). 이러한 수행수준은 ‘기억,활용, 발견’으로 세분화된다(Merrill & Boutwell, 1973;Merrill & Wood, 1974). | |
수행수준을 세분화하는 기준은? | 먼저, 수행수준은 ‘학생이 어떤 수준에서 학습한 내용을 사용할 수 있어야 하는가?’와 관련된 것으로 학습결과로 학습자가 획득한 능력에 대한 행동 수준이다(Suh, Lee & Han, 2017). 이러한 수행수준은 ‘기억,활용, 발견’으로 세분화된다(Merrill & Boutwell, 1973;Merrill & Wood, 1974). 첫째, 기억(remember)은 이미 저장된 정보를 재생하는 것이다. |
Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (2011). 2009 Reformed Mathematics Curriculum, Seoul: MEST.
Ministry of Education (2015). Mathematics Curriculum. Seoul: ME.
Ministry of Education (2019a). Mathematics 3-1. Seoul: Chunjae Education..
Ministry of Education (2019b). Mathematics 3-2. Seoul: Chunjae Education..
Ministry of Education (2019c). Mathematics 4-1. Seoul: Chunjae Education..
Ministry of Education (2019d). Mathematics 4-2. Seoul: Chunjae Education..
Ministry of Education (2019e). Mathematics 5-1. Seoul: Chunjae Education..
Ministry of Education (2019f). Mathematics 5-2. Seoul: Chunjae Education..
Ministry of Education (2019g). Mathematics 6-1. Seoul: Chunjae Education..
Ministry of Education (2019h). Mathematics 6-2. Seoul: Chunjae Education..
Kim, W. K., Joe, M. S., Bang, K. S., Lim, S. H., Kim, D. H., Kang, S. J., Bae, S. K. Jee, E. J., & Kim, Y. H. (2019) Mathematics 1, Seoul: Bisang.
Kim, W. K., Joe, M. S., Bang, K. S., Lim, S. H., Kim, D. H., Kang, S. J., Bae, S. K. Jee, E. J., & Kim, Y. H. (2019) Mathematics 2, Seoul: Bisang.
Kim, J. H. (2011). Awareness and Steps of the Mathematical Justification of Elementary and Middle School Students, Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 15(2), 417-435.
Kim, T. E., Oh, S. C., Park, T. J., Woo, Y., K, Kwon, S. K., Kim, Y. B., & Seo, D. H. (2017). A Study on the Growth Process of Elementary and Middle School Underachievers, Korea Institute of Curriculum and Evaluation RRI 2017-6.
Park, K. M. et al. (2015). Development of revised mathematics course curriculum. Seoul: Korea Foundation for the advancement of science and reativity.
Park, K. M. et al. (2014). Study on the restructuring of integrated mathematics curriculum. Seoul: Ministry of Education.
Park. H. S. (1991). Korea Mathematical Education History, Chungbuk: Korea Textbook Corporation.
Baek, S. H., Kim, S. H., Hong, S. I., Yang, I. H., & Lee, J. C. (1993). An Analysis of Current Science Instruction Consistency by Micro Instructional Design Theory, Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 13(3), 366-376.
Suh, B. E. (2019). The Study on the Movement of Mathematics Contents among School Levels, East Asian mathematical journal, 35(4), 365-386.
Song, J. S. (2009). An analysis of the presentation form of the contents on the textbooks by instructional quality profile. Unpublished master dissertation, Korea National University of Education.
Shin, H. Y., You, E. S., Han, I. K., Suh, B. E,, Jeon, Y. B., Na, J. Y., & Shin, K. C. (2019). Jumping in School Mathematics, Chungbuk: Maedesign.
Woo, J. H. (2006). Learning Mathematics-Teaching Principles and Methods, Seoul: Seoul National University Press.
Woo, J. H. (2007). Educational Foundations of School Mathematics, Seoul: Seoul National University Press.
Yoon, H. B. (1999). The Correlation Between Elementary School And Middle School Mathematics Record, Journal of the Korean School Mathematics, 1(2), 145-156.
Lee, B. J., Han, I. K., & Suh, B. E. (2018a). An evaluation on the quality of mathematics instruction for 8th grade based on the instructional quality profile, East Asian mathematical journal, 34(2), 103-126.
Lee, B. J., Han, I. K., & Suh, B. E. (2018b). An Evaluation on the Instruction Quality of Elective Courses Based on Instructional Quality Profile for Mathematics, The journal of educational research in mathematics, 28(4), 541-570.
Choi, S. Y. (1993). A study on teaching profiles utilization for qualitative evaluation of textbooks. Development of curriculum evaluation tool(2). Eduational research institute of Korea National University of Education.
KOFAC(2018). On-site support team for mathematics education, KOFAC Research Report.
Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation (2019). Curriculum Improvement Measures for Underachievers in Mathematics, KICE Research Report(In Press).
Bloom, B. S.(1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Noston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Bruner, J. (1960). The process of education, Harvard University Press.
Gagne, R. M. (1965). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction(1st ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Gagne, R. M., & Briggs, L. J. (1974). The principles of instructional design(1st ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Krutetskii, V. A.(1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in schoolchildren. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McHolland, J. D. (1971). Human Potential Seminars: An Approach to Turning on the Gifted Underachiever. ED 047349.
Menchinskaya, N. A.(1979). Intellectual activity in solving arithmetic problems. In Kilpatrick, J and Wirszup, I.(Eds.) Soviet Studies in the Psychology of Learning and Teaching Mathematics, University of Chicago Press: 7-53.
Merrill, M. D. & Boutwell, R. C. (1973). Instructional development: methodology and research. Review of Research in Education 1, 95-131.
Merrill, M. D. (1983). The component display theory. In Reigeluth, C. (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: an overview of their current status. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: 279-333.
Merrill, M. D., Leston Drake, Mark J. Lacy, Jean A. Pratt & the ID2 Research Group at Utah State University(1997). Reclaiming Instructional Design. Educational Technology 36(5), 5-7.
Merrill, M. D. , Richards, R. E., Schmidt, R. V., & Wood, N. D. (1977). The instructional strategy diagnostic profile training manual. SD: Courseware, Inc.
Merrill, M. D., & Wood, N. D. (1974). An instructional strategy taxonomy: Theory and applications. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 6, 195-201.
Merrill, M. D., Reigeluth, C., & Faust, G. (1979). The instructional quality profile: a curriculum evaluation and design tool. In H. A. O'Neil, Jr. (Ed.), Procedures for instructional systems development. NY: Academic Press.
Shoff, H. G. (1984). The gifted underachiever: definition and identification. ED 252029.
Suh, B., Lee, B., & Han, I. (2017). Development of IQP-based mathematics instructional quality profile. Advanced Studies in Contemporary Mathematics 27(4), 539-560.
Vygotsky, L. S.(2000). Spirit in Vygotsky society. Seoul: Yangseowon.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.