최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기한국과학교육학회지 = Journal of the Korean association for science education, v.40 no.3, 2020년, pp.291 - 305
The purpose of this study is to examine whether and how the features of performance assessments implemented during integrated science classes are related to teachers' PCK. We observed and video recorded four high school teachers' performance assessment practices, interviewed them, and surveyed their...
Abell, S. K., & Siegel, M. A. (2011). Assessment literacy: What science teachers need to know and be able to do. In The professional knowledge base of science teaching (pp. 205-221). Springer, Dordrecht.
Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (2002). Formative assessment and science education. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards through Classroom Assessment. The Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139-144, 146-148.
Cho, H. H., & Ko, Y. J. (2008). Re-conceptualization of secondary science teacher's pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) and its application. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 28(6), 618-632.
Frederiksen, J. R., & Collins, A. (1989). A Systems approach to educational testing. Educational Researcher, 18(9), 27-32. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018009027
Jang, H.-S. & Choi, B. S. (2010). A case study on the development of science teachers PCK through development of content representation (CoRe). Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 30(6), 870-885.
Kang, N.-H., & Wallace, C. S. (2005). Secondary science teachers' use of laboratory activities: Linking epistemological beliefs, goals, and practices. Science Education, 89(1), 140-165. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20013
Kim, S. (2002). A study on the teacher's competence for classroom assessment. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 15(1), 67-85.
Kim, S. N., Kang, E., Kim, B. C., Park, S. C., Yoo, J. E., Lee, E. S., Jun, M. N., Cho, H. H. (2013). A Study on Student Evaluation Policy for Fostering Creative Talents: Focusing on International Cases. KEDI Research Report OR, 2013-09. Seoul: Korean
Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Richter, D., Voss, T., & Hachfeld, A. (2013). Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 805-820. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032583
Kwak, Y.-S. (2003). Case study on science classroom analysis. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 23(5), 484-493.
Lee, K. H., Kang, H. Y., Ko, E. S., Lee, D. H., Shin, B., Lee, H. C., & Kim, S. H. (2016). Exploration of the direction for the practice of process-focused assessment. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 26(4), 819-834.
Lee, J., Ryu, G., Kang, S., Noh, T., & Kang, H. (2018). The characteristics of PCK components and their integrations in developing performance assessment tasks of pre-service chemistry teachers participating in constructive performance assessment workshop. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 38(4), 505-518.
Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2004). In search of pedagogical content knowledge in science: Developing ways of articulating and documenting professional practice. Journal of research in science teaching, 41(4), 370-391.
Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95-132). Springer, Dordrecht.
Moss, P. A. (1992). Shifting conceptions of validity in educational measurement: Implications for performance assessment. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 229-258. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003229
Noh, T., Lee, J., Kang, S., Han, J., & Kang, H. (2017). The characteristics of the PCK components of pre-service secondary chemistry teachers considered in developing performance assessment. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 37(2), 291-299.
Park, K. H. & Chung, Y. L. (2018). A case study on pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) search and instructional practice of two novice high school science teachers. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 22(5), 293-304. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2018.22.5.293
Park, J., Jin, K.-A., Kim, S., & Lee, S.-A. (2018). A Study for Enhancing the Teacher' Expertise in Student Assessment for Stabilizing Process-Fortified Assessment Policy. KICE RRE, 2018-5. Jincheon-gun, Chungcheongbuk-do.
Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. National Academy Press, 2102 Constitutions Avenue, NW, Lockbox 285, Washington, DC 20055.
Popham, W. J. (2008). Transformative Assessment. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriclum Development.
Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Furtak, E. M., Ayala, C., Yin, Y., & Shavelson, R. J. (2010). Formative assessment, motivation, and science learning. In Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 151-170). Routledge.
Shavelson, R. J., Baxter, G. P., & Pine, J. (1991). Performance Assessment in Science. Applied Measurement in Education, 4(4), 347-362. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324818ame0404_7
Sherin, M., & van Es, E. A. (2008). Effects of video club participation on teachers' professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 20-37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108328155
Shin, H., Ahn, S., & Kim, Y. (2017). A policy analysis on the process-based evaluation-focusing on middle school teachers in Seoul. Journal of Curriculum Evaluation, 20(2), 135-162.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001
Wiliam, D., & Black, P. (1996). Meanings and Consequences: A basis for distinguishing formative and summative functions of assessment? British Educational Research Journal, 22(5), 537-548. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192960220502
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.