$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

다중흐름모형을 적용한 서울형 유급병가 정책 도입과정에 관한 연구
A Study on the Policy Decision Making Process of Seoul-Type Paid Sick Leave: Applying Kingdon's Multiple Streams Model 원문보기

Health policy and management = 보건행정학회지, v.30 no.3, 2020년, pp.286 - 300  

정현우 (고려대학교 대학원 보건과학과 BK21PLUS 인간생명-사회환경 상호작용 융합사업단) ,  박소현 (고려대학교 대학원 보건과학과 BK21PLUS 인간생명-사회환경 상호작용 융합사업단) ,  손민성 (고려사이버대학교 보건행정학과) ,  정혜주 (고려대학교 대학원 보건과학과 BK21PLUS 인간생명-사회환경 상호작용 융합사업단)

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

In 2019, the Seoul metropolitan government established its own 'Seoul-type paid sick leave project'. Although the central government had to introduce such a system, which is also called sickness benefits, it was not implemented. In order to understand the process by which the Seoul government has im...

주제어

#Sickness benefit   #Paid sick leave   #Multiple streams framework   #Policy decision making model  

표/그림 (4)

질의응답

핵심어 질문 논문에서 추출한 답변
서울형 유급병가의 대상은 누구인가? 2018년 4월, 서울시는 2019년부터 ‘서울형 유급병가제도’를 도입할 것을 발표하였다[1]. ‘서울형 유급병가’는 서울시 근로자들의 상병으로 인한 근로활동 중단과 이로 인한 소득상실을 보전해주기 위한 제도로, 근로자들 중에서도, 특히 건강보험 지역가입자 중 중위소득 100% 미만에 해당하는 저소득근로자와 영세자영업자 등을 대상으로 하고 있다. 당시 발표된 내용에서는 이들이 입원할 경우 서울시가 서울시 생활임금에 해당하는 8만 1,184원을 최대 11일(건강검진 1일 포함)까지 제공하는 내용을 담고 있었다.
서울형 유급병가란 무엇인가? 2018년 4월, 서울시는 2019년부터 ‘서울형 유급병가제도’를 도입할 것을 발표하였다[1]. ‘서울형 유급병가’는 서울시 근로자들의 상병으로 인한 근로활동 중단과 이로 인한 소득상실을 보전해주기 위한 제도로, 근로자들 중에서도, 특히 건강보험 지역가입자 중 중위소득 100% 미만에 해당하는 저소득근로자와 영세자영업자 등을 대상으로 하고 있다. 당시 발표된 내용에서는 이들이 입원할 경우 서울시가 서울시 생활임금에 해당하는 8만 1,184원을 최대 11일(건강검진 1일 포함)까지 제공하는 내용을 담고 있었다.
서울형 유급병가가 발표된 당시에, 근로자가 입원할 경우 서울시에서 어떤 것을 제공하는 내용이 포함되어 있는가? ‘서울형 유급병가’는 서울시 근로자들의 상병으로 인한 근로활동 중단과 이로 인한 소득상실을 보전해주기 위한 제도로, 근로자들 중에서도, 특히 건강보험 지역가입자 중 중위소득 100% 미만에 해당하는 저소득근로자와 영세자영업자 등을 대상으로 하고 있다. 당시 발표된 내용에서는 이들이 입원할 경우 서울시가 서울시 생활임금에 해당하는 8만 1,184원을 최대 11일(건강검진 1일 포함)까지 제공하는 내용을 담고 있었다. 이후 12월 서울시의회 본회의에서 ‘서울형 유급병가 지원에 관한 조례안’과 예산이 가결되면서 정식적으로 도입되었고, 2019년 6월부터 시행되었다[2].
질의응답 정보가 도움이 되었나요?

참고문헌 (78)

  1. Yon YJ. Seoul city introduces 'Seoul-type paid sick leave'. Labortoday. 2018 Apr 5. 

  2. Health and Welfare Committee, Seoul Metropolitan Council. A screening report of Seoul-type paid sick leave ordinance in Seoul. Seoul: Seoul Metropolitan Council; 2018. 

  3. Chung HJ, Sohn MS, Kim JM, Kim JS, Jung HW, Che X, et al. Analyzing uncovered health care services of municipal hospital and establishing the health care coverage expansion strategy: focused on the Seoul-type paid sick leave system and innovative health security policy. Seoul: Seoul Health Foundation; 2018. 

  4. Choi ID, Kim JS. Introduction of sickness benefit program in health insurance: focus on the system design and estimating finance. Korean Soc Secur Stud 2007;23(2):221-247. 

  5. Shin KC. Policy measures for consolidating sickness benefits. Korean Soc Secur Stud 2011;27(1):133-156. 

  6. Kim JS. A research on sickness benefit. Soc Secur Law Rev 2016;5(1):1-29. 

  7. International Labour Organization. Information System on International Labour Standards [Internet]. Geneva: International Labour Organization [cited 2020 Mar 2]. Available from: https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?pNORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_ INSTRUMENT_ID:312247. 

  8. Kim KT, Lee SS. Comparative analysis of sickness benefits abroad and proposal for its introduction in Korea. Soc Welf Policy 2018;45(1):148-179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15855/swp.2018.45.1.148. 

    상세보기 crossref

  9. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Public expenditure on disability and sickness cash benefits in % GDP [Internet]. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development; 2017 [cited 2020 Mar 2]. Available from: http://stats.oecd.org/. 

  10. Lee JE, Cha YS. Global financial crisis and firms employment portfolio strategy: cases of employment flexibility in German firms. Korean J Resour Dev 2011;14(2):27-53. 

  11. Choi ET. The minister of Health and Welfare agreed with the free vaccination for rotaviral infection, but he said it should be considered carefully, and so is the Sickness Benefit. Dailypharm. 2017 Jul 27. 

  12. Choi SR, Park MJ. The study about application of Kingdon’s policy stream model. J Korean Policy Stud 2012;12(1):119-137. 

  13. Chang HJ. An analysis of domestic research applying the multiple streams framework: who are policy entrepreneurs and how does the policy window open in policy change at the central and local levels of administration? Korean J Local Gov Stud 2017;21(2):379-403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20484/klog.21.2.16. 

    상세보기 crossref

  14. Jung MK, Lee BR. The policy formation process of a local government explained through the multiple streams framework: Seoul city's measure for the protection of public sector non-regular workers. Korea Local Adm Rev 2014;28(2):51-80. 

  15. Choe JM. Investing national fiscal system reform with multiple streams framework: focusing on the legislative process of the 2006 National Finance Act. Korean Assoc Policy Stud 2016;25(1):577-604. 

  16. Hur MH, Jung JW. The legislation process of the parliamentary brawls prevention provisions: an analysis using multiple streams framework. Korean J Public Adm 2012;21(3):37-70. 

  17. Park SY, Kim MJ. Policy analysis on master teacher system with Kingdon's multiple stream model. Korean J Educ Adm 2012;30:149-171. 

  18. Kim GR, Lee IY. A study on the half tuition policy change process: based on multiple streams framework. J Polit Educ 2014;21(1):27-49. 

  19. Chang HJ. What are the primary types, roles and strategies of policy entrepreneurs in policy change process of Korea?: a meta analysis on Kingdon's multiple streams framework. Korean Assoc Policy Stud 2017;26(2):449-475. 

  20. Zahariadis N. The multiple streams framework: structure, limitations, prospects. In: Sabatier PA, editor. Theories of the policy process. 2nd ed. Boulder (CO): Westview Press; 2007. pp. 65-92. 

  21. Simon HA. Reason in human affairs. Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press; 1990. 

  22. Kingdon JW. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Longman; 1995. 

  23. Jung KH, Won YS, Jo SW. A study on the policy process of eradication policy formation of the scandals on the world of sports based on Kingdon's multiple streams model. J Korean Soc Sport Policy 2016;37:125-145. 

  24. Park KY. An analysis of the teacher evaluation policy change: based on the policy stream framework. J Res Educ 2012;42:41-71. 

  25. Solecki WD, Michaels S. Looking through the postdisaster policy window. Environ Manag 1994;18(4):587-595. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02400861. 

    상세보기 crossref

  26. Kingdon JW, Thurber JA. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston (MA): Little, Brown; 1984. 

  27. Lee SN. A study on the policy changes applied Kingdon's policy streams and windows model: focusing on the case of the Armed Forces Nursing Academy policy. Korean Public Manag Rev 2007;18(2):261-283. 

  28. Kim JW. An analysis of the policy formation process of the four social insurances integration: an application of the modified policy streams framework and policy implications. Korean Assoc Policy Stud 2009;18(2):157-189. 

  29. Kim BK, Kim SH. A study on the policy changes applied Kingdon's policy windows model: focusing on the legislation of the Prostitution Prevention Act. J Korean Local Gov 2006;8(2):163-183. 

  30. Birkland TA. After disaster: agenda setting, public policy, and focusing events. Washington (DC): Georgetown University Press; 1997. 

  31. Lee YH. Policy-making process of the 'permanent rental housing' program. Korean Assoc Hous Policy Stud 1996;7:29-55. 

  32. Jung HW, Yang JY, Cha XH, Lee JH. Catastrophic medical expenditure, is it only a matter of medical expenses?: focusing on mediating effects of reduced earned income due to mid-to-long-term hospitalization. Korean J Health Econ Policy 2019;25(4):29-56. 

  33. Oh SY, Kim MH. International comparison of catastrophic health expenditure. Seoul: Korea Insurance Research Institute; 2016. 

  34. Lee HJ. Determinants of household catastrophic health expenditure and impacts on poverty [dissertation]. Seoul: Seoul University; 2015. 

  35. Lee SY. Daniel Blake and a mother and two daughter in Songpa. Pressian. 2017 Jun 13. 

  36. Yoo WS. The death of a mother and two daughter in Songpa, it would happen again if there is no intervention. Ohmynews. 2014 Jun 24. 

  37. Lee SJ. Those people who can not obtain benefits from national health insurance premium reorganization plan. Ksilbo. 2017 Apr 19. 

  38. Kim SK. Is health care a welfare or an industry? Rapportian. 2015 Dec 18. 

  39. Kim SK. Poverty is a communicable disease because the health insurance premium and health inequality be succeeded in one's offspring. Rapportian. 2017 Feb 10. 

  40. Choi JY. Those who not have employment insurance can receive unemployment benefits? M-economynews. 2016 Dec 21. 

  41. Kim JH, Nam BR. Presidential election candidates, "raising parental leave, new child allowance" ... but there is no way to raise funds. Hankookilbo. 2017 Apr 22. 

  42. Jang YH. Painful, sad, and income loss due to sick ... can the sickness benefit system be an alternative? Kukinews. 2017 Feb 24. 

  43. Shon C, You M. Thinking of future crisis response of public organizations in healthcare sector: focusing on health centers' responses to the 2015 MERS outbreak. Korea J Hosp Manag 2016;96-106. 

  44. Park GB. For the workers with loss of workforce, Korea is still far from 'sickness benefit system'. Dailymedi. 2015 Dec 28. 

  45. Hong JR. Essays on the health insurance coverage expansion [dissertation]. Seoul: Seoul National University; 2016. 

  46. Kim KO, Shin YJ. The effect of the policy of expanding coverage for four major diseases: focused on out-of-pocket payment. Health Soc Welf Rev 2017;37(2):452-476. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15709/hswr.2017.37.2.452. 

    상세보기 crossref

  47. Kim DH, Kang SH. Effects of critical illnesses on losing income and their policy implications. Korean J Insur 2015;102:39-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17342/kij.2015.102.2. 

    상세보기 crossref

  48. Seo MJ. Is the government trying to invest 17 trillion won of the Health Insurance Corporation surplus into financial products? "use it to cut medical costs". Medipana. 2016 Mar 31. 

  49. Kim YM, Park WS, Proposal to introduce 'Korean basic income system'. Shinailbo. 2016 Dec 21. 

  50. Seo MS. Assemblyman Cheon Jeong-bae, "creating 500,000 jobs ... converting to one million irregular workers". News1. 2017 Feb 21. 

  51. Choi NY. Withdrawal from the establishing-profit hospital, Jae-myeong Lee and Sang-jeong Shim 'agree' ... Ahn Hee-jung 'decision after evaluation'. Young Doctor News. 2017 Apr 1. 

  52. Kim SK. Shim Sang-jung promised to introduce the 'sickness benefits', what about Moon Jae-in and Ahn Cheol-soo? Rapportian. 2017 Apr 19. 

  53. Kim JJ. Introducing sickness benefit systems costs for at least 1.4 trillion won per year. Dailypharm. 2017 Feb 24. 

  54. Park YM. In the political situation in early election, the patient group brought up with 'sickness allowance' agenda. Medicaltimes. 2017 Feb 24. 

  55. Do HR. In the candlelight election, 57% of respondents said THAAD should decide on the new government. Mediaus. 2017 Apr 18. 

  56. Kim CK. In the candlelight election, 56.5% of citizens said THAAD should decide on the new government. Ohmynews. 2017 Apr 19. 

  57. Kim KS. Presidential candidates begin to discuss 'basic income' introduction. Seoul Economic Daily. 2016 Dec 25. 

  58. Kim GA. Ahead of presidential election, procrastinators are trying to discuss the introduction of 'basic income system'. Shinailbo. 2016 Dec 25. 

  59. Jeon JW. Expanded to 5 general hospitals in Seoul ... daily employment paid sick leave. News1. 2018 Apr 4. 

  60. Kum BR. Workers in daily jobs will also get paid sick leave, ... making 'healthy Seoul'. Asian Economic News. 2018 Apr 4. 

  61. Jin DR. For workers who can't rest even if they are sick, the Seoul metropolitan government introduce Seoul paid sick leave. Moneytoday. 2018 Apr 4. 

  62. Kim YM. Seoul Metropolitan Assemblyman Soyang Kim objected to introducing the 'Seoul-type paid sick projects' too fast. Shinailbo. 2018 Sep 11. 

  63. Song MS. Seoul Metropolitan Assemblyman Hyunjung Oh raised question about the feasibility of budgeting for Seoul-type paid sick leave projects. The Leader. 2018 Sep 11. 

  64. Park SY. Let's adopt the sickness benefit system using the financial surplus of KRW 20 trillion of national health insurance finances. Doctor's News. 2017 Feb 24. 

  65. Jang HN. Seoul Metropolitan Assemblyman Soyang Kim said, "citizen empathy must be preceded before pushing the Seoul paid sickness project". Ilyoshinmoon. 2018 Sep 11. 

  66. Kim SB. Oh Hyun-jeong, a member of the Seoul City Council, requested that the Seoul-type paid sick leave project be implemented after a social agreement. Dailygrid. 2018 Sep 12. 

  67. Jo YM. Most of the small business workers and daily Job workers were positive at introducing the Seoul-type paid sick leave projects in the debate. MBN. 2018 Oct 16. 

  68. Lim SH. Held a debate on the Seoul-type medical security system. Tbroad. 2018 Oct 16. 

  69. Min YW. Policy discussion meeting for the establishment of the Seoul type health-related income security system. Dailygrid. 2018 Oct 17. 

  70. Ro CH. Seoul metropolitan assemblyman Hyun-Jung Oh held a policy debate on the establishment of the Seoul medical security system. Joongdoilbo. 2018 Oct 17. 

  71. Ro CH. City councilor Kim So-yang said, "the mayor of Park Won-soon is pursuing policies without neglecting social agreements and procedures." Joongdoilbo. 2018 Nov 16. 

  72. Ahn SH. Na Baek Joo, the chief of Civil Health Bureau of Seoul, "Seoul type-paid sick leave, the first step to ensuring the right to treatment." Financial News. 2019 Aug 25. 

  73. Heracleous LT. Rational decision making: myth or reality? Manag Dev Rev 1994;7(4):16-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09622519410771628. 

    상세보기 crossref

  74. Baumgartner FR, Jones BD. Agendas and instability in American politics. 2nd ed. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press; 2009. 

  75. Farley J, Baker D, Batker D, Koliba C, Matteson R, Mills R, et al. Opening the policy window for ecological economics: Katrina as a focusing event. Ecol Econ 2007;63(2-3):344-354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.029. 

    상세보기 crossref

  76. Crow DA. Policy entrepreneurs, issue experts, and water rights policy change in Colorado. Rev Policy Res 2010;27(3):299-315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2010.00443.x. 

    상세보기 crossref

  77. Copeland P, James S. Policy windows, ambiguity and Commission entrepreneurship: explaining the relaunch of the European Union's economic reform agenda. J Eur Public Policy 2014;21(1):1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.800789. 

    상세보기 crossref

  78. Lee DK, Yang GU. An analysis on government response change of Somalia piracy issues: focused on the multiple stream model. Korean Assoc Local Gov Stud 2012:281-297. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

GOLD

오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로