[논문]교수자 커뮤니케이션 행동의 차별적 효과에 대한 연구: 학습자의 성격요인과 커뮤니케이션 특성에 따른 집단간 차이

안호림

doi:10.14400/jdc.2021.19.1.361

교수자 커뮤니케이션 행동의 차별적 효과에 대한 연구: 학습자의 성격요인과 커뮤니케이션 특성에 따른 집단간 차이
Effects of Teacher's Commnunicative Behaviors on Instructor and Class Evaluations: by Student Personalty Traits and Communication Characteristics 원문보기

디지털융복합연구 = Journal of digital convergence, v.19 no.1, 2021년, pp.361 - 371

안호림 (인천대학교 교양학부)

초록
AI-Helper

지금까지 교육커뮤니케이션 연구는 주로 교수자에 초점을 두어왔다. 학습효과의 극대화를 위해서는 교수자 뿐아니라 학습자의 특성에 대한 고려도 필요하다. 이 연구는 학생들을 성격요인과 커뮤니케이션 특성에 따라 각기 상이한 특징을 갖는 유형으로 구분하고, 각 유형에 따라 교수자의 특성이 교수자 평가 및 수업 평가에 미치는 차별적 영향에 대해 탐색하였다. 연구문제에 답하기 위해 대학생들을 상대로 설문조사를 실시하였으며, 수집된 자료는 군집분석과 회귀분석을 통해 분석되었다. 군집분석 결과 학생들의 성격요인중 개방성을 제외한 4개요인과 커뮤니케이션 특성을 기준으로 2개의 집단으로 구분되었다. 집단은 각각 안정-과묵형, 불안-다변형으로 명명하였다. 유형별로 교수자의 특징이 미치는 영향의 차이를 알아보기 위한 회귀분석 결과, 집단별 회귀분석에서 독립변인의 효과가 상이하게 나타나는 것을 확인하였다. 논문의 분석 결과는 학생의 성격 요인과 커뮤니케이션 특성 요인에 따라 유형 구분이 가능하며, 각 유형별로 상이한 소통방식과 강의전략이 필요함을 시사한다. 논문은 교육자 중심의 교육커뮤니케이션 연구에 새로운 방향과 접근방식을 제시하였다는 의의를 갖는다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

Communication education research has focused on the effects of instructor characteristics on learning. It is necessary to consider student characteristics as well to develop an effective teaching strategy. The current study tries to classify students into multiple distinct groups depending on their personality traits and communication characteristics and investigates differences in effects of teacher characteristics between those groups. A survey on unversity students was conducted to collect data. A cluster analysis was carried out to identify distint sub-groups of respondents by their personality traits and communication characteristics. The analysis yielded two distinct groups. The two groups were named stable-reticent group', and 'neurotic-talkative group' respectivley. Series of multiple regression were carried out in order to investigate differences in the effects of instructor characteristics. The analyses found different patterns of effects between the two sub-groups. The findings suggest that it is necessary to adopt different communication styles and teaching strategies depending on student types.

주제어

표/그림 (4)

그림 Fig. 1. Research Model
표 Table 1. t-test results between two clusters (n=246)
표 Table 2. Regression results on instructor evaluation
표 Table 3. Regression results on class evaluation

참고문헌 (44)

J. C. McCroskey, K. M. Valencic & V. P. Richmond. (2004). Toward a general model of instructional communication. Communication Quarterly, 52, 197-210.

상세보기
T. Chamorro-Premuzica & A. Furnham. (2009). Mainly Openness: The relationship between the Big Five personality traits andlearning approaches. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 524-529.

상세보기
M. Komarraju, S. J. Karau, R. R. Schmeck & A. Avdic. (2011). The Big Five personality traits, learning styles, and academic achievement. Personaloty and Individual Differences, 51, 472-477.

상세보기
D. Ahn, & J. Youn. (2009). Birth order and personality as predictors of adolescents' academic achievement. Korean Journal of Educational Psychology. 23(3), 623-643.
B. Chin, S.Yun, S. Cho & B, Ham. (2005). A Study of Relationships among Academic Achievement, Character-Temperament in High School Student. Journal of Korean Association of Social Psychiatry, 25(2), 32-37.
Y. J. Lee & Y. Choi. (2013). Cognitive Ability and Personality as Predictors of Academic Performance: Science Gifted Students. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education. 23(4). 523-525.

원문보기 상세보기
G. W. Allport. (1937). Personality: a psychological interpretation. Holt.
R. R. McCrae & P. T. Costa. (1987). Validation of Five-Factor Model of Personality A Cross instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 81-90.

상세보기
I. S. Lee. (2003). An Analysis of Big 5 Personality Model and Business Ethics as Factors for Organizational Effectiveness. Korean management review, 32(6). 1593-1621.
P. T, Costa & R. R. McCrae, (1992). The NEO personality inventory(NEO-PI-R) professional manua.l. Odessa, FL: psychological assessment resources.
J. F. Salgado. (1997). The five model of personality and job performance in the European community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82. 30-43.

상세보기
T. Y. Yoo & B. M. Min. (2001). Predictability of Big-Five personality model to performance in a variety of settings and its limitation : A meta-analysis. The Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 14(2), 115-134.
J. L. Chesebro. (2003). Effects of teacher clarity and nonverbal immediacy on student learning, receiver apprehension, and affect. Communication Education, 52, 135-147.

상세보기
J. C. McCroskey, A. D. Heisel & V. P. Richmond. (2001). Eysenck's BIG THREE and communication traits: Three correlational studies. Communication Monographs, 68, 360-366.

상세보기
V. P. Richmond & J. C. McCroskey. (1998). Communication apprehension, avoidance, and effectiveness (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
J. C. McCroskey, & M. J. Beatty. (1999). Communication apprehension. In J. C. McCroskey, J. A. Daly, M. M. Martin, & M. J. Beatty (Eds.). Communication and personality: Trait perspectives. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
J. C. McCroskey, S. Booth-Butterfield & S. K. Payne. (1989). The impact of communication apprehension on college student retention and success. Communication Quarterly, 37, 100-107.

상세보기
P. M. Ericson & J. W. Gardner. (1992). Two longitudinal studies of communication apprehension and its effects on college students' success. Communication Quarterly, 40, 127-137.

상세보기
J. C. McCroskey & M. E. Sheahan. (1978). Communication apprehension, social preference, and social behavior in a college environment. Communication Quarterly, 26, 41-45.

상세보기
H. Ahn. (2013). A Study on the Influence of Communicational Factors between Instructor and Student on Education : Exploring the Characteristics of Communication in Situations and the Behavior Model. Doctoral Dissertation. HanYang University. Seoul.
J. C. McCroskey & V. P. Richmond. (1993). Identifying compulsive talkers: The Talkaholic Scale. Communication Research Reports, 10, 107-114.

상세보기
S. D. Fortney, D. I. Johnson & K. M. Long. (2001). The impact of compulsive communicators on the self-perceived competence of classroom peers: An investigation and test of instructional strategies. Communication Education, 50, 343-356.

상세보기
J. Song & J. Lee, (2014). Career Preparation Behavior Differences on Cluster Types based on Big Five Personality Traits and Achievement Goal Orientations among College Students. Korean Journal of Counseling. 15(3). 1183-1198.

상세보기
M. E. Costache, A. Frick, K. Mansson, J. Engman, V, Faria, O, Hjorth, et al. (2020). Higher and lower-order personality traits and cluster subtypes in social anxiety disorder. PLoS ONE 15(4): e0232187. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232187

상세보기
V. P. Richmond. (1990). Communication in the classroom: Power and motivation. Communication Education, 39, 181-195.

상세보기
V. P. Richmond & J. C. McCroskey. (1984). Power in the classroom II: Power and learning. Communication Education, 33, 125-136.

상세보기
T. G. Plax, P. Kearney, J. C. McCroskey & V. P. Richmond. (1986). Power in the classroom VI: Verbal control strategies, nonverbal immediacy and affective learning. Communication Education, 35, 43-55.

상세보기
J. C. McCroskey, J. M. Fayer, V. P. Richmond, A. Sallinen & R. A. Barraclough. (1996). A multicultural examination of the relationship between nonverbal immediacy and affective learning. Communication Quarterly, 44, 297-307.

상세보기
P. Schrodt, P. L. Witt, & P. D. Turman, (2007). Reconsidering the measurement of teacher power use in the college classroom. Communication Education, 56, 308-332.

상세보기
P. D, Turman & P. Schrodt, (2006). Student perceptions of teacher power as a function of perceived teacher confirmation. Communication Education, 55, 265-279.

상세보기
F. F. Fuller. (1969). Concerns of teachers: A developmental conceptualization. American Educational Research Journal, 2, 207-226.

상세보기
K. Weber, M. M.. Martin & S. A. Myers. (2011). The development and testing of the instructional beliefs model. Communication Education, 60(1), 51-74.

상세보기
A. K. Goodboy & S. A. Myers. (2008). The effect of teacher confirmation on student communication and learning outcomes. Communication Education, 57(2), 153-179.

상세보기
A. K. Goodboy & M. M., Martin, (2005). Student motives for communicating with their instructors: A validity study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Communication Association, Pittsburgh, PA.
B. N. Frysby & M. M. Martin. (2010). Instructor-student and student-student rapport in the classroom. Communication Education, 59, 146-164.

상세보기
J. K. Kim & H. Ah., (2014). The Relatioship between Instructors' and Students' Communication Characteristics and Educational effects. Korean Jouranl of Communication Studies. 22(1). 65-93.
S. Kim, J. Kim, J. Yoo. K. Bae, S. Kim, S. Yang, I. Shin, & J. Yoon. (2010). Standardization and Validation of Big Five Inventory-Korean Version(BFI-K) in Elders. Korean Jouranl of Biological Psychiatry. 17(1). 15-25.
J. C, McCroskey, (1982). Oral communication apprehension: A reconceptualization. Communication Yearbook, 6, 136-170.
V. P. Richmond & J. C. McCroskey. (1990). Reliability and separation of factors on the assertiveness-responsiveness measure. Psychological Reports, 67, 449-450.

상세보기
M. J. Smythe & J. A. Hess. (2005). Are student self-reports a valid method for measuring teacher nonverbal immediacy? Communication Education, 54, 170-179.

상세보기
P. Schrodt, P. L. Witt & P, D. Turman. (2007). Reconsidering the measurement of teacher power use in the college classroom. Communication Education, 56, 308-332.

상세보기
A. Q. Staton-Spicer & R. E. Bassett. (1979). Communication concerns of preservice and inservice elementary school teachers. Human Communication Research, 5(2), 138-146.

상세보기
J. C. McCroskey, V. P. Richmond, T. G. Plax & P. Kearney. (1985). Power in the classroom V: Behavior alteration techniques, communication training and learning. Communication Education, 34, 214-226.

상세보기
J. F., Jr., Hair & W. C. Black, (2000). Cluster analysis. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding more multivariate statistics. Washington, DC:American Psychological Association.

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format