[논문]한국 자동차산업의 기업간 거래관계에 의한 지리적 네트워크 구조 분석

김혜림; 문태헌

doi:10.11108/kagis.2021.24.3.058

한국 자동차산업의 기업간 거래관계에 의한 지리적 네트워크 구조 분석
Analysis of Geographic Network Structure by Business Relationship between Companies of the Korean Automobile Industry 원문보기

한국지리정보학회지 = Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies, v.24 no.3, 2021년, pp.58 - 72

김혜림 (경상국립대학교 도시공학과) , 문태헌 (경상국립대학교 도시공학과)

초록
AI-Helper

2021년 7월 UNCTAD가 우리나라를 선진국으로 분류할 정도로 우리나라가 발전하는 성과가 있었다. 그러나 급변하는 글로벌 경제에 대응하기 위해서는 국내 산업생태계를 연구하여 끊임없이 변화시키고 성장을 위한 전략을 마련해야 한다. 그 중 하나가 기업간 네트워크를 강화하는 것이며, 본 연구는 기업 간 거래 데이터 구득이 가능한 자동차산업을 대상으로 공간적인 산업 네트워크를 분석하였다. 데이터는 295개의 기업 데이터(노드)와 607개의 거래 관계 데이터(링크)를 활용하였다. 기업의 주소지를 지오코딩하여 공간상 분포를 확인한 결과, 자동차산업 관련 기업은 수도권과 동남권에 집중 분포하고 있었다. 연결중심성, 매개중심성, 근접중심성, 위세중심성 등을 통해 노드의 중요도를 측정하고, 밀도, 거리, 커뮤니티 탐지, 동류성 및 이류성을 파악하여 네트워크 구조를 확인하였다. 그 결과, 4가지 노드 중요도에서 상위 15위 기업은 완성차기업 중에서는 현대자동차, 기아자동차, 한국지엠 3개의 기업이 공통적으로 포함되고, 상위 15위 기업은 주로 수도권에 입지하고 있다. 규모 면에서 연결중심성과 매개중심성은 대부분 종업원 수가 1,000명 이상인 큰 기업이고, 근접중심성과 위세중심성은 완성차기업을 제외하면 대개 종업원 수가 500명 이하인 기업이 상위 15위 안에 포함되었다. 전체적인 네트워크의 구조는 밀도는 0.01390522, 노드 간 평균거리는 3.422481로 나타났으며, 빠른탐욕알고리즘으로 커뮤니티 탐지를 실시한 결과, 최종적으로 11개의 커뮤니티가 도출되었다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

In July 2021, UNCTAD classified Korea as a developed country. After the Korean War in the 1950s, economic development was promoted despite difficult conditions, resulting in epoch-making national growth. However, in order to respond to the rapidly changing global economy, it is necessary to continuously study the domestic industrial ecosystem and prepare strategies for continuous change and growth. This study analyzed the industrial ecosystem of the automobile industry where it is possible to obtain transaction data between companies by applying complexity spatial network analysis. For data, 295 corporate data(node data) and 607 transaction data (link data) were used. As a result of checking the spatial distribution by geocoding the address of the company, the automobile industry-related companies were concentrated in the Seoul metropolitan area and the Southeastern(Dongnam) region. The node importance was measured through degree centrality, betweenness centrality, closeness centrality, and eigenvector centrality, and the network structure was confirmed by identifying density, distance, community detection, and assortativity and disassortivity. As a result, among the automakers, Hyundai Motor, Kia Motors, and GM Korea were included in the top 15 in 4 indicators of node centrality. In terms of company location, companies located in the Seoul metropolitan area were included in the top 15. In terms of company size, most of the large companies with more than 1,000 employees were included in the top 15 for degree centrality and betweenness centrality. Regarding closeness centrality and eigenvector centrality, most of the companies with 500 or less employees were included in the top 15, except for automakers. In the structure of the network, the density was 0.01390522 and the average distance was 3.422481. As a result of community detection using the fast greedy algorithm, 11 communities were finally derived.

주제어

표/그림 (8)

표 TABLE 1. Comparison of research cases
그림 FIGURE 1. Data collection
그림 FIGURE 2. Node distribution
그림 FIGURE 3. Automotive industry network
표 TABLE 2. Link by car company
표 TABLE 3. Top 15 companies by node centrality
표 TABLE 4. Modularity
표 TABLE 5. Automotive industry community

참고문헌 (34)

Ahn. H.I. 2017. A study on networks charactristics defense industry in Korea. industrial development institute Kyungsung University 33(3):265-289.
Andrea Lancichinetti and Santo Fortunato. 2009. Benchmarks for testing community detection algorithms on directed and weighted graphs with overlapping communities. Physical Review E. 80(1):016118.

상세보기
Carol Corrando, Jonathan Haskel and Cecilia Jona-Lasinio. 2017. Knowledges spillovers, ICT and productivity growth. Oxford bulletin of economics and statistics. 79(4):592-618.

상세보기
Cheon. B.Y., and Jeong. J.H. 2019. Open innovation and platform strategy in Korea focusing on building car-mobility ecosystem. Journal of Korean Social Trend and Perspective 2019(105):180-228.
Cho. E.S. 2014. An analysis on cluster integration based on regional specialized industries - focused on 7 Innvation clusters -. Gangwon association for public administration 12(1):1-31.
Cho. M.K., and Kang. M.G. 2020. The dynamic process of regional industrial ecosystem: focused on automobile business network. Journal of the Korean Regional Development Association 32(4):43-66.
Cho. R.S. 2017. Centralities in pharmaceutical supply network and patent application : social network analysis. Journal of the Korea society for simulation 2017(4):3901-3923.
Choi. Y.C. 2009. Analysing the network structure for regional strategic industry: application of social network analysis technique. The Korean Association for Policy Analysis and Evaluation 19(2):277-304.
Chun. H.J. 2015. The comparison of coauthor networks of two statistical journals of the Korean statistical society using social network analysis. Journal of the Korean data & information science society 26(2) : 335-346.

원문보기 상세보기
Chung. E.D., Yang. Y.S., and Park. J.C. 2007. A study for firm-centered clustering to rejuvenate industrial cluster : A case study of Daeduck high-up program. Journal of Industrial Economics and Business 20(4):1359-1380.
Egbert J. Boekema, Poul Erik Jensen, Eberhard Schlodder, Jan F.L. van Breemen, Henny van Roon, Henrik Vibe Scheller and Jan P.Dekker. 2001. Green plant photosystemI binds light-harvesting complex I on one side of the complex. Biochemistry. 40:1029-1036.

상세보기
Freeman. L. C. 1979. Centrality in social network: conceptual clarification. Social Networks 1(3):215-239.

상세보기
Han. K.S., Kim. I.W., and Choi. J.H. 2007. Relationship between business network characteristics and benefits in industrial cluster backgrounds. The Korean Association of Small Business Studies 29(1):135-162.
Industrial Statistics Analysis System. 2021. Statistics by industry. https://www.istans.or.kr/mainMenu.do. (Accessed August 10, 2021).
Jang. J.C. 2020. A study on the accomplishments and challenges of ROK's international development cooperation for community development. The Korean Regional Development Association 2020(1):642-653.
Jeong. B.K., and Lee. H.Y. 2014. Analyzing the domestic collaborative research network in industrial engineering. Journal of Korean institute of industrial engineers 40(6):68-627.
Jeong. J.H., and Kim. S.B. 2005. The spatial structure of industrial agglomerations and governance for regional innocation in Korea. Journal of the Economic Geographical Society of Korea 8(1):17-29.
Jung. J.H. 2017. The study on the automobile industry ecosystem using big data analysis. Journal of Industrial Economics and Business 30(5):1615-1642.

상세보기
Kang. A.R., Oh. I.S., Jung. D.I. and Lee. W.H. 2019. inspiring insight in business society 48(1):105-131.
Kim. Y.L., and Kim. K.D. 2019. Gyeonggi research institute 2019:1-70.
Kim. H.S., and Lee. T.R. 2013. Age-specific disease network for the major diseases. Journal of The Korea Society of Health Informatics and Statistics 38(1):66-80.
Kim. J.K., Kim. S.H., and Oh. C.H. 2015. Comparison of journal clustering methods based on citation structure. Journal of the Korean data & information science society 26(4):827-839.

원문보기 상세보기
Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade. 2021. Future Strategic Industry Brief No.17. https://www.kiet.re.kr/kiet_web/main/. (Accessed August 10, 2021).
Kwon. Y.S. 2007. Promoting regional innovation projects and cluster formation in Korea. Korea Academic Society Industrial Complex 1(1):29-46.
Kevin Morgan and Claire Nauwelaers. 2002. Regional innovation strategies - The challenge for less-favoured regions. Routledge :1-276.
Liang Dai, Ben Derudder and Xingjian Liu. 2018. The evolving structure of the southeast Asian air transport network through the lens of complex networks, 1979-2012. Journal of Transport Geography. 68(2018):67-77.

상세보기
MEJ Newman. 2003. The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM review 45(2):167-256.

상세보기
MEJ Newman. Modularity and community structure in networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103(23):8577-8696.
Michael E.Porter. 1998. Clusters and the new economic of competition. Harvard Business Review. Harvard Business Review 76(6):77-90.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 2021. Press Releases. https://www.mofa.go.kr/www/index.do. (Accessed August 10, 2021).
Park. C.S., and Kang, A.R. 2020. Exploring endogeneous processes in automobile supply network: An exponential random graph model analysis. Korean management review 49(1):129-153.

상세보기
Phillip Bonacich. 2007. Some unique properties of eigenvetor centrality. Social networks 29(4):555-564.

상세보기
Statistics KOREA. 2021. Gross Domestic Product and Economic Growth Rate. https://www.index.go.kr/main.do. (Accessed Aug ust 10, 2021).
Stephen P. Borgatti, and Xun Li. 2009. On social network analysis in a supply chain context. Journal of Supply Chain Management. 45(2):5-22.

상세보기

저자의 다른 논문 :

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증