최소 단어 이상 선택하여야 합니다.
최대 10 단어까지만 선택 가능합니다.
다음과 같은 기능을 한번의 로그인으로 사용 할 수 있습니다.
NTIS 바로가기한국과학교육학회지 = Journal of the Korean association for science education, v.42 no.1, 2022년, pp.161 - 176
강은주 (옥포초등학교)
This study developed an MEA program to which the invention technique was applied and analyzed the conceptual change of students. The MEA activity applying the invention technique (TRIZ) was composed of the topic of making a paper electric circuit in the section 'Using electricity' presented in the 6...
Altay, M., & Akar, S. (2014). Pre-service elementary mathematics teachers' views on model-eliciting. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 345-349.
Arshad, A., Halim, L., & Nasri, N. (2021). Impact of integrating science and engineering teaching approach on students achievement: A meta analysis. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(2), 159-170.
Chamberlin, S., & Moon, S. (2005). Model-eliciting activities as a tool to develop and identify creatively gifted mathematicians. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17(1), 37-47.
Chi, M., Slotta, J., & de Leeuw, N. (1994). From things to process: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. Learning and Instruction, 4, 27-43.
Choi, S. (2009). Teacher's curriculum development based on students' preconception: Focusing on application of the cognitive conflict process model to electricity unit in elementary school science curriculum. (Master's thesis). Ewha Womans University Graduate School, Seoul.
Cunningham, C., Lachapelle, C., Brennan, R., Kelly, G., Tunis, C., & Gentry, C. (2020). The impact of engineering curriculum design principles on elementary students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(3), 423-453.
Edelson, D. (2001). Learning-for-use: A framework for the design of technology-supported inquiry activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 355-385.
Gomez-Zwiep, S. (2008). Elementary teachers' understanding of students' science misconceptions: Implications for practice and teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19(5), 437-454.
Guzey, S., & Jung, J. (2021). Productive thinking and science learning in design teams. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(2), 215-232.
Hake, R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64-74.
Hong, H., Kim, J., Choi, B., & Lee, J. (2012). Conceptual understanding process for electric circuit of elementary science-gifted students using dynamic science assessment. The Korean Society for the Gifted, 22(3), 703-728.
Huh, M., Nam, S., & Lee, J. (2021). Meta-analysis on the effect of elementary invention education. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 27(1), 99-118.
Im, J., Lee, S., & Yang, I. (2010). Analysis of elementary school teachers' laboratory instruction process through experiments from science laboratory and engineering laboratory. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 29(4), 515-525.
Kang, E., & Kim, J. (2020). The effects of experimental activity with computing thinking expression on elementary school students' scientific models. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 70(7), 595-602.
Kim, H. (2007). Development and verification of the invention education model applied with TRIZ techniques. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 20(1), 61-84.
Kim, H. (2020). The effect of 'gravitational acceleration measuring device' inventing education program using arduino's various sensors on science-gifted elementary school students' creative problem solving and attitude towards science. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 20(17), 1101-1122.
Kim, J., & Moon, S. (2009). Development of practical arts education program for the improvement of elementary school children's interest in the invention using TRIZ method. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 22(1), 93-114.
Korea Invention Promotion Association (2014). Interesting story of Dr. Tongtong's invention using the TRIZ technique. Korea Invention Promotion Association, Korean Intellectual Property Office.
Korean Intellectual Property Office (2017). Act on the activation and support of invention education(Enacted on March 14, 2017, Act No. 14590).
Krajcik, J., McNeill, K., & Reiser, B. (2008). Learning-goals-driven design model: Developing curriculum materials that align with national standards and incorporate project-based pedagogy. Science Education, 92(1), 1-32.
Kwon, H., Lee E., & Lee, D. (2016). Meta-analysis on the effectiveness of invention education in South Korea: Creativity, attitude, and tendency for problem solving. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(1), 48-57.
Kwon, J. (1992). How to diagnose for children's misconception of science? Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 11(2), 173-180.
Lee, C. (2013). Analysis of contents related to the invention in elementary school textbooks according to the 2007 revised curriculum. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 19(3), 23-43.
Lee, H., Kim, A., & Hong, Y. (2010). 'My creative thermometer' program for the gifted in elementary science. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 14(3), 453-467.
Lee, J., & Choi, Y. (2010). The development and application effect of IDEAL-TRIZ learning program to improve technological problem-solving capability for elementary school students. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 23(2), 213-233.
Lee, K., Lew, K., & Han, Y. (2016). The effect of DHA-I program based on TRIZ to improve creativity and confluence problem solving ability of lower grade elementary school children. The Journal of Creativity Education, 16(3), 97-111.
Lee, M., & Jeon, J. (2020). Recognition and education needs of the invention education of elementary school teachers. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 26(3), 87-118.
Lee, Y., & Park, J. (2012). Pedagogical methodology of teaching activity-based flow chart for elementary school students. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education, 16(4), 489-501.
Lesh, R., Hoover, M., Hole, B., Kelly, A., & Post, T. (2000). Principles for developing thought-revealing activities for students and teachers. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 591-646). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lewis, T. (2006). Design and inquiry: Bases for an accommodation between science and technology education in the curriculum. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(3), 255-281.
Lohse, G., Biolsi, K., Walker, N., & Rueter, H. (1994). A classification of visual representations. Communications of the ACM, 37(12), 36-50.
Lou, S., Shih, R., Tseng, K., Diez, C., & Tsai, H. (2010). How to promote knowledge transfer through a problem-based learning internet platform for vocational high school students. European Journal of Engineering Education, 35(5), 539-551.
McLure, F., Won, M., & Treagust, D. F. (2020). A sustained multidimensional conceptual change intervention in grade 9 and 10 science classes. International Journal of Science Education, 42(5), 703-721.
Ministry of Education [MOE]. (2015a). National practical course/computer and information curriculum No. 2015-74.
Ministry of Education [MOE]. (2015b). National science curriculum No. 2015-74.
Moon, S., & Kim, O. (2011). The development of an invention education program using the wise life textbook for children's creativity. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 15(2), 333-351.
Moore, T. (2008). Model-eliciting activities: A case-based approach for getting students interested in material science and engineering. Journal of Materials Education, 30(5-6), 295-310.
Nesmith, S., & Cooper, S. (2021). Connecting engineering design and inquiry cycles: Impact on elementary preservice teachers' engineering efficacy and perspectives toward teaching engineering. School Science and Mathematics, 121(5), 251-262.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. Washington DC: The National Academies Press.
Noh, J., Son, J. Jeon, J. Song, J., & Kim, J. (2019). The effects of step-by-step question-based unit design on elementary school students' understanding of 'seasonal change' concept. Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 12(2), 151-164.
Park, J. (2012). A survey of elementary-students' concepts about electric circuits. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 62(8), 848-855.
Park, S., & Kim, Y. (2006). Current status and strategy for development of invention education in elementary school-Based at science, practical art and arts subjects. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 19(1), 132-133.
Pintrich, P., Marx, R., & Boyle, R. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational research, 63(2), 167-199.
Posner, G., Strike, K., Hewson, P., & Gertzog, W. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Towards a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211-277.
Radloff, J., & Capobianco, B. (2021). Investigating elementary teachers' tensions and mitigating strategies related to integrating engineering design-based science instruction. Research in Science Education, 51(1), 213-232.
Reddy, M., & Panacharoensawad, B. (2017). Students problem-solving difficulties and implications in physics: An empirical study on influencing factors. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(14), 59-62.
Roth, W. (2001). Learning science through technological design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 768-790.
Seidman, I. (2009). Interviewing as a qualitative research. NY: Teacgers College Press.
Self, B., Miller, R., Kean, A., Moore, T., Ogletree, T., & Schreiber, F. (2008). Important student misconceptions in mechanics and thermal science: Identification using model-eliciting activities. 38th ASEE/IEEE Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Frontiers in Education Conference.
Seo, S., Jin, S., Jeong, S., & Kwon, J. (2002). Elementary students' cognitive conflict through discussion and physical experience in learning of electric circuit. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 22(4), 862-871.
Shipstone, D. (1988). Pupils' understanding of simple electrical circuits. Some implications for instruction. Physics Education, 23(2), 92.
Smith, J., Disessa, A., & Roschelle, J. (1994). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(2), 115-163.
Smith, K., & Burghardt, D. (2007). Teaching engineering at the K-12 level: Two perspectives. The Technology Teacher, 66(7), 20-24.
Song, J. (2003). Constructivist science education and the map of students' physics misconceptions. The Mathematical Education, 42(2), 87-109.
Song, J., Kang, S., Kwak, Y., Kim, D., Kim, S., Na, J., Do, J., Min, B., Park, S., Bae, S., Son, Y., Son, J., Oh, P., Lee, J., Lee, H., Iim, H., Jeong, D., Jong, J., Kim, J., & Joung, Y. (2019). Contents and features of 'Korean Science Education Standards (KSES)' for the next generation. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 39(3), 465-478.
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills-Learning for life in our times. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Tsai, C. (2003). Using a conflict map and an instructional tool to change student alternative conceptions in simple series electric-circuits. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 307-327.
Vidic, N., Ozaltin, N., Besterfield-Sacre, M., & Shuman, L. (2014). Model eliciting activities motivated problem solving process: Solution path analysis. American Society for Engineering Education, 24.911.1-24.911.19.
Wulandari, A. (2018). Correlation between critical thinking and conceptual understanding of student's learning outcome in mechanics concept. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2014, No. 1, p. 020028). AIP Publishing LLC.
Wulandari, A., Agustina, N., Hidayati, Y., & Tsulutsya, F. (2019). Increasing students' problem-solving ability on the pressure concept through model-eliciting activities(MEAs). In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2202, No. 1, p. 020058). AIP Publishing LLC.
Yu, G., Jeong, J., Kim, Y., & Kim, H. (2018). Qualitative research methods. Seoul: Pakyoungsa.
*원문 PDF 파일 및 링크정보가 존재하지 않을 경우 KISTI DDS 시스템에서 제공하는 원문복사서비스를 사용할 수 있습니다.
Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.