[논문]건설현장배치 수준의 정량적 평가: 사용성평가 방법을 활용하여

박성훈; 김태완; 손보식

doi:10.6106/kjcem.2022.23.5.034

건설현장배치 수준의 정량적 평가: 사용성평가 방법을 활용하여
Quantitative Analysis of Construction Site Layout: A Usability Evaluation Study 원문보기

한국건설관리학회논문집 = Korean journal of construction engineering and management, v.23 no.5, 2022년, pp.34 - 42

박성훈 (인천대학교 건축학과) , 김태완 (인천대학교 도시건축학부) , 손보식 (남서울대학교 건축공학과)

초록
AI-Helper

건설현장배치는 프로젝트 공기와 비용에 큰 영향을 미치므로 이에 대한 최적화 및 자동화 연구가 수행되고 있다. 하지만, 이러한 연구의 목표변수인 건설현장배치의 수준을 평가하는 근거는 매우 제한적이다. 본 연구는 사용성평가 방법을 활용하여 건설현장배치의 수준을 평가하고 향후 건설현장배치 자동화 및 최적화 연구에서 초점을 맞추어야 하는 부분을 확인하고자 하였다. 설문결과 국내건설현장배치 사용성은 효과와 작업환경 항목에서 낮은 점수를 받았으며, 작업자가 관리자에 비해 낮게 평가하였다. 또한 작업환경 항목에서 낮은 점수를 받았으며 현장접근성과 시설 편의성이 낮음을 확인하였다. 이 연구는 건설현장배치 현황을 파악하고 개선방향을 제시함으로써 건설현장배치 자동화 및 최적화 연구의 진행을 위한 지식에 기여한다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

Construction site layout is attracting attention as efficient use of construction site space greatly affects the duration and cost of the overall construction. Therefore, there are many studies that automate and optimize construction site layout planning. However, the usability of construction site, which consists of goal variables of the studies, has still been unknown. Therefore, the authors present the evaluation criteria for usability of construction site layout and evaluate the usability of domestic construction sites through user survey. Furthermore, the difference in usability between construction site managers and construction site workers was confirmed. As a result of the survey, domestic construction site layout had a low effectiveness and had the lowest score in the environment category. In addition, construction site workers scored lower overall than construction site managers. Through such usability evaluation results, it contributed to the construction site layout theory by assessing current construction site layout practice and suggesting an improvement direction for automating site layout planning.

주제어

표/그림 (10)

그림 Fig. 1. Usability that results from use of a system, product or service in a context of use [ISO9241-11]
표 Table 1. Usability evaluation method
그림 Fig. 2. Research procedure
표 Table 2. Construction site layout usability evaluation criteria
표 Table 3. Profiles of survey respondents
표 Table 4. Cronbach's α reliability test
표 Table 5. Usability score of construction site layout
표 Table 6. Detailed score for each component
표 Table 7. One-way ANOVA according to years of continuous service
표 Table 8. Usability score for each evaluation criteria of construction site managers and workers

참고문헌 (24)

Abotaleb, I., Nassar, K., and Hosny, O. (2016). "Layout optimization of construction site facilities with dynamic freeform geometric representations." Automation in Construction, 66, pp. 15-28.

상세보기
Chae, U., Kim, K., Choi, J., Hyun, D., Yun, J., Lee, G., Hyun, Y., Lee, J., and Chung, M. (2021). "Systematic usability evaluation on two harnesses for a wearable chairless exoskeleton." International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 84, 103162.

상세보기
El-Rayes, K., and Said, H. (2009). "Dynamic site layout planning using approximate dynamic programming." Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 23(2), pp. 119-127.

상세보기
Hammad, A. (2020). "A multi-objective construction site layout planning problem solved through integration of location and traffic assignment models." Construction Management and Economics, 38(8), pp. 756-772.

상세보기
Harte, R., Glynn, L., Rodriguez-Molinero, A., Baker, P., Scharf, T., Quinlan, L., and OLaighin, G. (2017). "A human-centered design methodology to enhance the usability, human factors, and user experience of connected health systems: a three-phase methodology." JMIR human factors, 4(1), p. e5443.

상세보기
Harun, S., Hamid, M., Talib, A., and Rahim, Z. (2011). "Usability evaluation: Criteria for quality architecture in-use." Procedia Engineering, 20, pp. 135-146.

상세보기
Hegazy, T., and Elbeltagi, E. (1999). "EvoSite: Evolution-based model for site layout planning." Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 13(3), pp. 198-206.

상세보기
ISO. (2018). 9241-11 Ergonomics of human-system interaction-Part 11 Usability definitions and concepts. ISO 9241-11.
ISO/IEC. (2016). 25066 Systems and software engineering-Systems and software Quality requirements and evaluation(SQuaRE)-Common industry format (CIF) for usability-Evaluation report. ISO/IEC 25066.
ISO/TR. (2002). 16982 Ergonomics of human-system interaction-Usability method supporting human-centred design. ISO/TR 16928.
Jaafar, K., Elbarkouky, R., and Kennedy, J. (2021). "Construction site layout optimization model considering cost and safety in a dynamic environment." Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 22(2), pp. 297-312.

상세보기
Kim, M., Yu, M., Oh, S., Hong, C., and Kwon, T. (2021). "Improvement Plans through Usability Test of Indoor Mobility Device for Senior Living Assistance." Rehabilitation Engineering And Assistive Technology Society of Korea, 15(3), pp. 147-157.
Kumar, S., and Cheng, J. (2015). "A BIM-based automated site layout planning framework for congested construction sites." Automation in Construction, 59, pp. 24-37.

상세보기
Lai, W., Fu, Y., Li, R., and Lin, J. (2020). "Optimum Design of Construction Site Layout Based on SLP Method and Genetic Algorithm." In ICCREM 2020: Intelligent Construction and Sustainable Buildings, Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineersm, pp. 71-83.
Lin, L., and Sharp, G. (1999). "Application of the integrated framework for the plant layout evaluation problem." European Journal of Operational Research, 116(1), pp. 118-138.

상세보기
Ning, X., Lam, K.C., and Lam, M.C.K. (2011). "A decision-making system for construction site layout planning." Automation in Construction, 20(4), pp. 459-473.

상세보기
Ning, X., and Wang, L. (2011). "Construction site layout evaluation by intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS model." In Applied Mechanics and Materials, Trans Tech Publications Ltd., 71, pp. 583-588.

상세보기
Park, U., and An, S. (2012). "Optimization Algorithms for Site Facility Layout Problems Using Self-Organizing Maps." Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction, 12(6), pp. 664-673.

원문보기 상세보기
Ren, Z., Anumba, C.J., & Tah, J.H.M.T. (2011). "RFID-facilitated construction materials management (RFID-CMM)-A case study of water-supply project." Advanced Engineering Informatics, 25(2), pp. 198-207.

상세보기
Sanad, H.M., Ammar, M.A., and Ibrahim, M.E. (2008). "Optimal construction site layout considering safety and environmental aspects." Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(7), pp. 536-544.

상세보기
Schwabe, K., Teizer, J., and Konig, M. (2019). "Applying rule-based model-checking to construction site layout planning tasks." Automation in Construction, 97, pp. 205-219.

상세보기
Tommelein, I., Levitt, R., and Hayes-Roth, B. (1992). "SightPlan model for site layout." Journal of construction engineering and management, 118(4), pp. 749-766.

상세보기
Yeh, I. (1995). "Construction-site layout using annealed neural network." Journal of computing in civil engineering, 9(3), pp. 201-208.

상세보기
Zolfagharian, S., and Irizarry, J. (2014). "Current trends in construction site layout planning." In Construction Research Congress 2014: Construction in a Global Network, pp. 1723-1732.

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증