[논문]상호작용적 독해 과정에서 생성된 질문과 답변의 분석을 통한 교사용 지도서와 초등예비교사의 내용지식 사이의 불일치 탐색 -'그림자와 거울' 단원을 중심으로

고아라; 이지원

doi:10.14697/jkase.2023.43.3.253

상호작용적 독해 과정에서 생성된 질문과 답변의 분석을 통한 교사용 지도서와 초등예비교사의 내용지식 사이의 불일치 탐색 -'그림자와 거울' 단원을 중심으로
An Exploration of Discrepancies between Text and Content Knowledge of Pre-service Elementary Teachers through an Analysis of Questions and Answers Created in the Interactive Reading of a Teacher's Guide: Focusing on a 'Shadow and Mirror' Unit 원문보기

한국과학교육학회지 = Journal of the Korean association for science education, v.43 no.3, 2023년, pp.253 - 263

초록
AI-Helper

이 연구에서는 초등학교 과학 빛의 직진과 반사 단원의 교사용 지도서 텍스트와 초등예비교사의 내용 지식 체계 사이의 불일치를 탐색하였다. 이를 위하여 교육대학교에 재학 중인 초등예비교사 279명이 교사용 지도서의 '그림자와 거울' 단원의 정해진 분량을 읽고 생성한 과학 지식에 대한 질문 455개와 답변 543개를 분석하였다. 질문은 과학 개념의 종류와 불일치 유형에 따라 분류하였고, 답변은 정확도를 분석하였다. 질문의 과학 개념을 분석한 결과, 초등예비교사들은 직진 개념에서는 그림자에 대해, 반사에서는 상에 대해, 그 외 개념에서는 광원에 대해 가장 궁금해하였다. 부정확한 답변이나 무응답률이 높아서 정답률이 낮은 질문은 반사에 의한 빛의 중첩, 실험도구의 원리, 렌즈에 의한 상 등으로 초등과학 교육과정에 일부포함되어 있거나 심화된 내용이었다. 불일치 유형에 따라 질문은 분류하면, 지식 충돌에 의한 질문보다 지식 결핍에 의한 질문 빈도가 89.5%로 높게 나타났으며, 지식 결핍 유형 중 현상의 원인에 대한 설명 요구 유형이 45.9%로 질문도 가장 많고, 답변의 정확도도 가장 낮았다. 이를 통해 초등예비교사의 지식 결핍에 의한 인지적 불일치가 해소될 수 있도록 초등교육과정에 현상 중심으로 제시되어 다루지 않는 개념이라도 교사가 알아야 할 개념은 교사용 지도서의 내용을 보강할 필요가 있다는 것을 확인하였다. 또한 교과서에 제시된 실험을 현장의 상황에 맞게 재구성할 때 정확한 실험이 이루어질 수 있도록 실험 설정의 이유와 실험 도구의 작동 원리에 대한 추가 설명을 지도서에 포함해야 할 필요가 있다는 것을 확인하였다. 지식 충돌에 의한 불일치는 현실에서 경험하는 것과 교과용 지도서에 제시된 내용이 충돌하여 생기는 사례가 많았다. 따라서 이를 해소하기 위해 우리 삶의 실제 맥락과 교과서 맥락에 대한 차이를 교사용 지도서에 포함하여 교사용 지도서 텍스트와 초등예비교사의 지식 사이의 불일치를 줄일 필요가 있다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

This study explored the discrepancy between the text of a teacher's guide about straight and reflective light and the content knowledge of pre-service elementary teachers. A total of 455 questions and 543 answers generated by 279 pre-service elementary teachers after reading a 'Shadow and Mirror' unit in the teacher's guide were analyzed. The questions were classified according to the types of concepts and discrepancies, and the answers were analyzed for accuracy. The results of analyzing the concepts of questions revealed that the pre-service elementary teachers were most curious about the shadow in the straight concept, the mirror image in the reflection concept, and the light source in other concepts. The questions with a low correct answer rate due to incorrect- or non-answers, such as those concerning the superposition principle of light by reflection, the principle of experimental tools, and images by lenses, were only partially or not included in the teacher's guide. When the questions were classified according to the type of discrepancy, the frequency of questions due to knowledge deficit was higher than that due to knowledge clash. This demonstrates that the concepts that teachers need to know must be supplemented with the contents of the teacher's guide. Discrepancies due to knowledge clashes are often caused by conflicts between what is experienced in everyday life and what is presented in textbooks. Therefore, it is necessary to reduce the discrepancy between the texts of the teacher's guide and the knowledge of pre-service elementary teachers by including the differences between the actual context of everyday life and the context of the textbook in the teacher's guide.

주제어

표/그림 (7)

표 Table 1. Structure of the 'Shadow and Mirror' unit in elementary school science textbook for 4^th grades(Ministry of Education, 2019)
표 Table 2. Classification of questions by type of discrepancy
표 Table 3. Frequency of questions by key concepts and accuracy of answers by category
표 Table 4. Frequency of questions by discordance type and accuracy of answers by category
표 Table 5. Cognitive discrepancies between the text and the reader about the concept of rectilinear propagation of light
표 Table 6. Cognitive discrepancies between the text and the reader about the concept of reflection of light
표 Table 7. Cognitive discrepancies between the text and the reader about other concepts

참고문헌 (52)

Barnett, J., & Hodson, D. (2001). Pedagogical context knowledge. Toward？a fuller understanding of what good science teachers know. Science？Education, 85(4), 426-453.
Chin, C., & Brown, D. E. (2002). Student-generated questions: A meaningful？aspect of learning in science. International Journal of Science？Education, 24(5), 521-549.

상세보기
Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2008). Students' questions: a potential resource？for teaching and learning science. Studies in science education, 44(1),？1-39.

상세보기
Dillon, J. T. (1988). The remedial status of student questioning. Journal of？Curriculum studies, 20(3), 197-210.
Galili, I. (1996). Students' conceptual change in geometrical optics.？International journal of science education, 18(7), 847-868.

상세보기
Galili, I., & Hazan, A. (2000a). Learners' knowledge in optics: interpretation,？structure and analysis. International Journal of Science Education,？22(1), 57-88.

상세보기
Galili, I., & Hazan, A. (2000b). The influence of an historically oriented？course on students' content knowledge in optics evaluated by means？of facets-schemes analysis. American Journal of Physics, 68(S1),？S3-S15.
Galili, I., Bendall, S., & Goldberg, F. (1993). The effects of prior knowledge？and instruction on understanding image formation. Journal of research？in science teaching, 30(3), 271-301.

상세보기
Go, A., & Kim, J. (2018). Development and Application of Tutorials on？Image Formation through Convex Lens Based on an Object Image？Consisted of Point Light Sources. School Science Journal, 12(2),？178-191.
Good, T. L., Slavings, R. L., Harel, K. H., & Emerson, H. (1987). Student？passivity: A study of question asking in K-12 classrooms. Sociology？of Education, 181-199.
Graesser, A. C., & Olde, B. A. (2003). How does one know whether a？person understands a device? The quality of the questions the person？asks when the device breaks down. Journal of Educational Psychology,？95(3), 524.

상세보기
Graesser, A. C., & Person, N. K. (1994). Question asking during tutoring.？American educational research journal, 31(1), 104-137.

상세보기
Grossnickle, E. M. (2016). Disentangling curiosity: Dimensionality,？definitions, and distinctions from interest in educational contexts.？Educational Psychology Review, 28(1), 23-60.

상세보기
Han, K., & Noh, S. (2003). An Analysis on the Utilization of Teacher's？Guides for Science in Elementary School. Journal of Korean？Elementary Science Education, 22(1), 51-64.
Jang, M. (2009). Elementary Teachers' Understandings and Instructional？Strategies on Students' Science Misconceptions. Journal of Korean？Elementary Science Education, 28(4), 425-439.
Jeon, S., & Shin, A. (2021) Proposal of the Experiments Utilizing the Light？Flux Screen for Optics Learning in the Elementary Science Education.？New Phys.: Sae Mulli, 71(1), 49-59.

상세보기
Jeon, Y. (2006). Understanding American Teachers' Use of Teachers'？Manuals: Two Case Studies. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education,？23(3), 5-24.
Jeong, J., Lee, J., & Kim, J. (2016). A Study on Elementary School Teachers'？Understanding of, Certainty in, and Familiarity with Wave Concepts？in Textbook and Teacher's Guidebook. Journal of Korean Elementary？Science Education, 35(4), 389-405.
Ji, S., & Park, J. (2016). Elementary School Teachers' Difficulties to Suffer？in the Science Classes from the Perspective of Content Knowledge？and Teaching Method. Journal of Science Education, 40(2), 116-130.
Jirout, J., & Zimmerman, C. (2015). Development of science process skills？in the early childhood years. Research in early childhood science？education, 143-165.
Kaltakci-Gurel, D., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2016). Identifying？pre-service physics teachers' misconceptions and conceptual？difficulties about geometrical optics. European Journal of Physics,？37(4), 045705.

상세보기
Kim, D, & Hong, S. (2014). The Study on the Concept of Pre-service？Elementary School Teachers Regarding Sedimentary Rock. The？Journal of Korea Elementary Education, 25(2), 227-245.
Kim, K., & Kim, J. (2011). Development and Application of Inquiry Modules？for Instruction for the Concept of Straight propagation of Light. Journal？of Science Education, 35(2), 173-192.
Ko, Y., & Lee, H. (2014). Pre-service Science Teachers' Understanding of？Students' Misconceptions in Physics and Perceptions on "Teacher as？a Researcher" through the Research Experience. Journal of the Korean？Association for Science Education, 34(5), 449-457.
Kwon, C, & Park, B. (2011). The Teacher's Recognition and Utilization？for Subject of New Science Teacher's Guide in the Elementary School.？The Journal of Korea elementary education, 21(2) 247-260.
Kwon, G. (2014). An Analysis of Elementary Pre-service Teachers'？Understanding of the Illustration of the Straw Reflection Image.？Teacher Education Research, 53(4), 815-824.
Kwon, G., Bang, S., Lee, S., & Lee, G. (2006). Context-dependency of？Students' Conceptions in Optics: Focused on Vision & Mirror Image.？Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 26(3),？406-414.
Lee, G., & Kim, J. (2017). Comparison of Understandings on Light？Propagation According to Shape of Light Source by Grade of？Elementary School Students. School Science Journal, 11(2), 220-235.
Lee, J. (2018). Collaborative Reading Comprehension of Science Textbook？via Students' Knowledge Sharing in an Online Annotation System.？Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 38(5),？667-680.
Lee, J. (2015). Perspectives on traveling according to light source in students,？pre- and in-service teachers. Master Thesis. Korea National University？of Education, Cheongju, Republic of Korea.
Lee, J. (2021). Analysis of Elementary Pre-Service Teacher's Difficulties？in Conceptual Understanding and Instructional Planning of Light？Refraction. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education,？41(1), 11-17.
Lee, K. (2013). An Analysis of the Association between Subject Matter？Knowledge and Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Science Teachers:？The Case of Earth Science Teachers'Lesson on Atmospheric Pressure.？Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(6),？1219-1236.
Lee, J., & Kim, J. (2012). Conceptual Changes on Electricity of Elementary？Teachers through the Tutorial Emphasizing the Motion of Charges.？Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 31(1), 84-98.

원문보기 상세보기
Lee, J., & Kim, J. (2013). Development and Application of Peer Instruction？Including Interactive Experiments Focused on Reflection of Light.？Journal of Science Education, 37(1), 186-202.
Lee, J., & Kim, J. (2022). A Comparative Study on the Concept of Light？Presented in Elementary School Science Curriculum and Textbooks？in Korea, the US, China, and Japan. Journal of Korean Elementary？Science Education, 41(2), 283-294.
Lee, J., Kim, J., Kim, K., Hwang, M., & Kim, J. (2013). Developing？Sequential ConcepTests for In-service Science Teachers' Training？based on Peer Instruction: Focus on "Principle of Pinhole Camera".？Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(2),？229-248.
Lee, S., Jhun, Y., Hong, J., Shin, Y., Choi, J., & Lee, I. (2007). Difficulties？experienced by elementary school teachers in science classes. Journal？of Korean Elementary Science Education, 26(1), 97-107.
Lee, W., Lee, S., & Lee, S. (2005). The technology teacher's recognition？and utilization for subject of technology and home economics teacher's？guide in the middle school. The Korean Journal of Technology？Education, 5(1), 56-70.
Miller, A., Fisch, A., Dodge, J., Karimi, A. H., Bordes, A., & Weston, J.？(2016). Key-value memory networks for directly reading documents.？arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.03126.
Ministry of Education (2019). A Guide for Science Teachers in Grades 5-6？of Elementary School. Gyeonggi: National Book Compilation？Committee.
Miyake, N., & Norman, D. A. (1979). To ask a question, one must know？enough to know what is not known. Journal of verbal learning and？verbal behavior, 18(3), 357-364.

상세보기
Otero, J., & Graesser, A. C. (2001). PREG: Elements of a model of question？asking. Cognition and instruction, 19(2), 143-175.
Paik, S., & Jung, Y. (2009). A Case Study of Elementary School Teachers'？Understanding of "Light and Image" and Change of Perception Related？to Learning Contents. Journal of Korean Elementary Science？Education, 28(3), 245-262.
Park, S., Park, J., & Back, N. (2014). An investigation on the conception？of the Light and Shadow for the elementary students. The Journal of？Korea Elementary Education, 25(3), 111-126.
Rollnick, M., Bennett, J., Rhemtula, M., Dharsey, N., & Ndlovu, T. (2008).？The place of subject matter knowledge in pedagogical content？knowledge: A case study of South African teachers teaching the？amount of substance and chemical equilibrium. International journal？of science education, 30(10), 1365-1387.

상세보기
Smith, D. C., & Neale, D. C. (1989). The construction of subject matter？knowledge in primary science teaching. Teaching and teacher？Education, 5(1), 1-20.

상세보기
Song, H., Lee, J., & Lee, G. (2012). Reflection on an elementary teacher's？dilemma in teaching magnetic field. Journal of Korean Elementary？Science Education, 32(1), 95-103.
Song, N., & Yoon, H. (2023). An Analysis of Elementary Pre-service？Teachers' Pedagogical Reasoning about Students' Dissolution and？Solution Conceptions. The Journal of Korea Elementary Education,？42(1), 64-81.
Taslidere, E., & Eryilmaz, A. (2015). Assessment of Pre-Service Teachers'？Misconceptions in Geometrical Optics via a Three-Tier？Misconception/Ogretmen Adaylarinin Geometrik Optik Konusundaki？Kavram Yanilgilarinin uc-Asamali Kavram Yanilgisi Testi ile？Degerlendirilmesi. Bartin universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 4(1), 269.
White, R., & Gunstone, R. (2014). Probing understanding. New York, NY:？Routledge.
Yoon, H., Lee, I., & Park, J. (2021). Pre-Service Elementary Teachers' Visual？Modeling Process for Reflection of Light. Journal of the Korean？Association for Science Education, 41(1), 19-31.
Zuzovsky, R., Tamir, P., & Chen, D. (1989). Specialized science teachers？and general teachers and their impact on student outcomes. Teaching？and teacher education, 5(3), 229-242.

상세보기

저자의 다른 논문 :

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format