$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

[국내논문] 학습공동체에 참여한 수학교사의 정체성 형성 과정에 대한 사례연구: 실천공동체 이론을 중심으로
Case study on identity development of mathematics teachers involved in learning community: Based on the theory of "Community of Practice" 원문보기

Journal of the Korean Society of Mathematical Education. Series E: Communications of Mathematical Education, v.38 no.1, 2024년, pp.1 - 26  

윤정은 (서울대학교 대학원) ,  권오남 (서울대학교)

초록

수학 수업의 질적 향상을 도모하기 위한 교사 연수 및 개별적인 노력의 한계가 보고되며, 대안적인 교사 전문성 체제로 학습공동체가 주목받고 있다. 학습공동체는 공동 목표를 바탕으로 상호 참여를 통해 수학 교과 내용, 교육학, 교육과정에 대한 레퍼토리를 형성하는 하나의 실천공동체(Community of Practice, CoP)이고, 따라서 교사들의 학습은 실천공동체 이론으로 해석할 수 있다. 이에 본 연구는 고등학교 교사 학습공동체에 참여한 수학교사들의 정체성 형성 과정을 실천공동체 이론을 중심으로 탐색하였다. 성찰 저널, 협의록, 수업 영상 전사본의 귀납적 분석을 통해 수학교사들의 학습공동체 참여 경험을 도출하였고, 참여 관찰 기록지를 토대로 개별 인터뷰를 진행한 후 이를 유형적으로 분석하여 각 수학교사의 정체성 형성 과정을 탐색하였다. 연구 결과 수학교사는 학습공동체 참여를 통해 수학 교수·학습에 관한 실천 형성, 지속적인 반성과 성찰을 통한 교수 실행 개선, 공동체 몰입을 통한 함께의 가치 인식을 경험했고, 이 경험을 바탕으로 주변적 궤적, 내부지향 궤적, 내부자 궤적, 경계적 궤적, 외부지향 궤적 등을 보이며 다양하게 정체성을 형성하였다. 이를 바탕으로 학습공동체의 효과적 운영을 위한 시사점이 논의되었고 후속 연구가 제안되었다.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

As the limitations of professional development programs and individual attempts to improve teaching expertise have been reported, mathematics teachers have operated various types of teacher learning communities as alternative teacher professional programs. A teacher learning community can be conside...

Keyword

표/그림 (10)

참고문헌 (77)

  1. Ministry of Education (2022). General curriculum. Notification of the Ministry of Education No. 2022-33 [Vol 1]. Ministry?of Education.? 

  2. Ministry of Education (2022). Mathematics curriculum. Notification of the Ministry of Education No. 2022-33 [Vol 8].?Ministry of Education.? 

  3. Kwon, N. Y. (2015). Meanings and practices in learning communities of mathematics teachers. Journal of Education and?Culture. 21(3), 83-102.? 

  4. Kwon, O. N., Park, J, S., Park, J. H., & Cho, H. (2014). Designing and implementing professional development program of?multi-tiered teacher community: Joint collaboration between teachers and PD program developers. The?Mathematical Education, 53(2), 201-217.? 

  5. Kim, K. T. (2018). Theory, issues and tasks of teacher identity. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 35(3),?491-521.? 

  6. Kim, S. & Han, S. (2022). Analysis on statistical problem solving process of pre-service mathematics teachers: Focus on?the result interpretation stage. Communications of Mathematical Education, 36(4), 535-558.? 

  7. Kim, Y. C. (2013). Qualitative methodology II: Methods. Academy Press.? 

  8. Kim, W. & Lim, W. (2020). Research trends in mathematics teacher learning community : Literature review.?Communications of Mathematical Education, 34(4), 51-74.? 

  9. Kim, E. J. (2010). A study on practical knowledge: The implication on teacher education and problem. The Journal of?Korean Teacher Education, 27(4), 27-46.? 

  10. Kim, J., Pang, J. S., & Kim, S. (2017). Case study of elementary mathematics lessons by a professional learning?community among teachers. Education of Primary School Mathematics, 20(4), 267-286.? 

  11. Kim, H. J., Jung, K. Y., & Lee, H. J. (2015). Identity development of science teachers involved in teacher communities:?Based on the theory of "community of practice". Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education,?33(2), 390-404.? 

  12. Na, G. S. (2010). Reporting the activities of learning community on elementary mathematics lesson. Journal of Education?Research in Mathematics, 20(3), 373-395.? 

  13. Park, E. J. (2018). The philosophical approach of teacher identity : The exploration for the existential identity of teachers.?The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 35(4), 71-94.? 

  14. Seo, K. H. (2009). Teacher learning communities and professional development. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education,?26(2), 243-276.? 

  15. Sun, W. J. & Pang, J. S. (2014). An analysis of strengths and weakness in the study of elementary mathematics lessons?via teacher learning community. Education of Primary School Mathematics, 17(3), 189-203.? 

  16. So, K. H. (2009). Teacher learning:How and what teachers learn. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27(3), 107-126.? 

  17. Oh, Y. Y. (2006). Exploring teacher change through the community of practice focused on improving mathematics teaching.?Journal of Education Research in Mathematics, 16(3), 251-272.? 

  18. Oh, T. K. (2016). For the reflective practice of math classes : Case study on the learning community of math teachers in?a school. School Mathematics, 18(1), 105-126.? 

  19. Lee, K. H., Song, C. K.., & Jung, H. Y. (2019). Change of teacher knowledge through task design in the?teacher-researcher community : Focused on knowledge of students in the area of derivatives application. The?mathematical Education, 58(2), 299-317.? 

  20. Jung, E. J. & Hong, W. P. (2022). Contract-based teachers' learning in secondary school: Focusing on legitimate peripheral?participation and identity formation, The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 39(3), 161-187.? 

  21. Cho, H., Kim, J., Na, J., & Kim, Y. (2019). Factors of participation and characteristics for community of practice in a?school. Korean Journal of Teacher Education, 35(3), 203-248.? 

  22. Ju, M. K. (2008). An analysis of a preservice teacher's questioning: The effect of practicum program based on?collaborative inquiry comunity. School Mathematics, 10(4), 515-535.? 

  23. Han, H. J. & Yang, J. H. (2011). Effects of the teachers' professional community on middle school students' mathematics?achievement. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 28(4), 117-140. 

  24. Akkerman, S. F., & Meijer, P. C. (2011). A dialogical approach to conceptualizing teacher identity. Teaching?and Teacher Education, 27(2), 308-319. 

  25. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based?theory of professional education. In L. Darling-Hammond, & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the?learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3-22). Jossey Bass. 

  26. Beijaard, D., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers' professional identity.?Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(2), 107-128. 

  27. Breakwell, G. M. (2001). Mental models and social representations of hazards: the significance of identity?processes. Journal of Risk Research, 4(4), 341-351. 

  28. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2001). Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organization?Science, 12(2), 198-213. 

  29. Bukor, E. (2015). Exploring teacher identity from a holistic perspective: Reconstructing and reconnecting?personal and professional selves. Teachers and Teaching, 21(3), 305-327. 

  30. Carrillo, J., & Climent, N. (2011). The development of teachers' expertise through their analysis of good?practice in the mathematics classroom. ZDM, 43, 915-926. 

  31. Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and?Teacher Education, 18(8), 947-967. 

  32. Cuban, L. (2013). Why so many structural changes in schools and so little reform in teaching practice?.?Journal of Educational Administration, 51(2), 109-125. 

  33. Danielewicz, J. (2001). Teaching selves: Identity, pedagogy, and teacher education. Suny Press. 

  34. Danielson, C. (2006). Teacher leadership that strengthens professional practice. ASCD. 

  35. Darling-Hammond, L., Burns, D., Campbell, C., Goodwin, A. L., Hammerness, K., Low, E. L., ... & Zeichner,?K. (2017). Empowered educators: How high-performing systems shape teaching quality around the?world. John Wiley & Sons. 

  36. Davidson, A., Herbert, S., & Bragg, L. A. (2019). Supporting elementary teachers' planning and assessing of?mathematical reasoning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(6),?1151-1171. 

  37. Delors, J. (2013). The treasure within: Learning to know, learning to do, learning to live together and?learning to be. What is the value of that treasure 15 years after its publication?. International?Review of Education, 59, 319-330. 

  38. DuFour, R. (2004). What is a" professional learning community"?. Educational Leadership, 61(8), 6-11. 

  39. Edgington, C. (2014). Teachers' uses of a learning trajectory as a tool for mathematics lesson planning. In?JJ. Lo, K. Leatham, & L. Van Zoest (Eds.), Research trends in mathematics teacher education (pp.?261-284). Springer International Publishing. 

  40. Elmore, R. F. (2004). School reform from the inside out: Policy, practice, and performance. Harvard?Education Press. 8 Story Street First Floor, Cambridge, MA 02138. 

  41. Flores, M. A., & Day, C. (2006). Contexts which shape and reshape new teachers' identities: A?multi-perspective study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(2), 219-232. 

  42. Gee, E. M. (1999). Ethnic identity among foreign-born Chinese Canadian elders. Canadian Journal on?Aging/La Revue Canadienne du Vieillissement, 18(4), 415-429. 

  43. Goodell, J. E. (2006). Using critical incident reflections: A self-study as a mathematics teacher educator.?Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(3), 221-248. 

  44. Goodson, I. F., & Cole, A. L. (1994). Exploring the teacher's professional knowledge: Constructing identity?and community. Teacher Education Quarterly, 85-105. 

  45. Goos, M., Bennison, A., & Proffitt-White, R. (2018). Sustaining and scaling up research-informed professional?development for mathematics teachers. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 20(2),?133-150. 

  46. Gordon, L. A., Loeb, M. P., & Tseng, C. Y. (2009). Enterprise risk management and firm performance: A?contingency perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 28(4), 301-327. 

  47. Graham, A., & Phelps, R. (2003). Being a teacher: Developing teacher identity and enhancing practice?through metacognitive and reflective learning processes. Australian Journal of Teacher Education,?27(2), 11-24. 

  48. Greenberg, J., & Baron, R.A. (2000). Behavior in organizations (7th ed.). Prentice-Hal. 

  49. Greeno, J. G., & The Middle-School Mathematics through Applications Project Group (1997). Theories and?practices of thinking and learning to think. American Journal of Education, 106(1), 85-126. 

  50. Hargreaves, D. H. (1994). The new professionalism: The synthesis of professional and institutional?development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10(4), 423-438. 

  51. Hatch, A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. State University of New York Press. 

  52. Hord, S. M. (1997). Professional learning communities: communities of continuous inquiry and improvement.?Southwest Educational Development Lab. 

  53. Horn, I. S. (2005). Learning on the job: A situated account of teacher learning in high school mathematics?departments. Cognition and Instruction, 23(2), 207-236. 

  54. Jansen, A., & Spitzer, S. M. (2009). Prospective middle school mathematics teachers' reflective thinking?skills: Descriptions of their students' thinking and interpretations of their teaching. Journal of?Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(2), 133-151. 

  55. Kelly, P. (2006). What is teacher learning? A sociocultural perspective. Oxford Review of Education, 32(4),?505-519. 

  56. Kieran, C., Krainer, K., & Shaughnessy, J. M. (2012). Linking research to practice: Teachers as key?stakeholders in mathematics education research. In M. Clements, A. Bishop, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick,?& F. Leung (Eds.), Third international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 361-392). Springer. 

  57. Lacey, C. (2012). The socialization of teachers (RLE Edu N). Routledge. 

  58. Lasky, S. (2005). A sociocultural approach to understanding teacher identity, agency and professional vulnerability?in a context of secondary school reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(8), 899-916. 

  59. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge Press. 

  60. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage publications. 

  61. Morse, J. M., & Richards, L. (2002). Readme first for a user's guide to qualitative methods. SAGE?Publications, Incorporated. 

  62. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2018). The future of education and?skills: Education 2030. OECD Education Working Papers. 

  63. Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage?publications. 

  64. Ponte, J. P. da, & Santos, L. (2005). A distance in-service teacher education setting focused on mathematics?investigations: The role of reflection and collaboration. Interactive Educational Multimedia, 11,?104-126. 

  65. Pultorak, E. G. (1993). Facilitating reflective thought in novice teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4),?288-295. 

  66. Reeves, D. B. (2006). The learning leader: How to focus on school improvement for better results.?Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. 

  67. Reeves, J. (2018). Teacher identity work in neoliberal schooling spaces. Teaching and Teacher Education, 72,?98-106. 

  68. Sachs, J. (2001). Teacher professional identity: Competing discourses, competing outcomes. Journal of?Education Policy, 16(2), 149-161. 

  69. Saltinski, R. (2013). The digital future of education-The cloud or the matrix. Journal of Instructional?Pedagogies, 10, 1-4. 

  70. Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. Teacher College Press. 

  71. Sinnema, C., & Aitken, G. (2013). Emerging international trends in curriculum. In M. Priestley & G. Biesta?(Eds.). Reinventing the curriculum: New trends in curriculum policy and practice (pp. 141-163).?Bloomsbury Academic. 

  72. Sutherland, L., Howard, S., & Markauskaite, L. (2010). Professional identity creation: Examining the?development of beginning preservice teachers' understanding of their work as teachers. Teaching?and Teacher Education, 26(3), 455-465. 

  73. Ticha, M., & Hospesova, A. (2006). Qualified pedagogical reflection as a way to improve mathematics?education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(2), 129-156. 

  74. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press. 

  75. Wenger, E., & Snyder, W. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business?Review, 78, 139-145. 

  76. Westheimer, J. (2008). Learning among colleagues: Teacher community and the shared enterprise of?education 1. In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, & J. McIntyre, (Eds.), Handbook of?research on teacher education (pp. 756-783). Routledge & Association of Teacher Education. 

  77. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Sage publications. 

저자의 다른 논문 :

활용도 분석정보

상세보기
다운로드
내보내기

활용도 Top5 논문

해당 논문의 주제분야에서 활용도가 높은 상위 5개 콘텐츠를 보여줍니다.
더보기 버튼을 클릭하시면 더 많은 관련자료를 살펴볼 수 있습니다.

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

GOLD

오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로