$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

[국내논문] AI 기반 수학 교수·학습에 대한 체계적 문헌 고찰: AI의 역할과 교사의 역할을 중심으로
Systematic literature review on AI-based mathematics teaching and learning: Focusing on the role of AI and teachers 원문보기

Journal of the Korean Society of Mathematical Education. Series A. The Mathematical Education, v.63 no.3, 2024년, pp.573 - 591  

윤정은 (서울대학교) ,  권오남 (서울대학교)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

본 연구는 AI 기반 수학 교수·학습에 대한 문헌을 체계적, 종합적으로 고찰하여 연구 동향을 탐색하고자 수행되었다. 이를 위해 최근 10년 간의 수학교육 문헌 중 문헌선정기준에 부합하는 57개의 문헌을 연구 대상, 연구 방법, 연구 목적, 학습 내용, AI의 유형, AI의 역할, 교사의 역할 측면에서 체계적 문헌 고찰하였다. 연구 결과, 연구 대상 중 학생을 대상으로 한 연구가 51%로 가장 많은 비중을 차지했으며, 연구 방법 중 양적 연구의 비중이 49%로 가장 높았다. 연구 목적은 효과 분석 44%, 이론적 논의 35%, 수업 사례 탐색 21%로 분포했다. 학습 내용으로 '수와 연산'과 '문자와 식'이 가장 많이 다루어졌고, AI 유형 중 지능형 튜터링 시스템(ITS)이 가장 많이 사용되었다. AI의 역할은 학습자 교수의 비중이 40.4%로 가장 높았으며, 교수자 지원 22.8%, 학습자 지원 21%, 시스템 지원 15.8% 순으로 분포하였다. 교사의 역할은 초기 연구일수록 'AI 수용자'로서의 역할이, 최근 연구일수록 'AI와의 건설적 파트너'로서의 역할이 부각되었고, 각 역할이 교육학적, AI-기술적, 내용적 측면에서 탐색되었다. 이를 통해 국내 수학교육 후속 연구의 방향이 제안되었고, AI 기반 수학 교수·학습에서의 교사가 갖추어야 할 소양이 논의되었다.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

The purpose of this study is to explore research trends on AI-based mathematics teaching and learning. For this purpose, a systematic literature review was conducted on 57 literatures in terms of research subject, research method, research purpose, learning content, type of AI, role of AI, and role ...

Keyword

표/그림 (11)

참고문헌 (86)

  1. Auccahuasi, W., Santiago, G. B., Nunez, E. O., & Sernaque, F. (2018). Interactive online tool as an instrument for learning?mathematics through programming techniques, aimed at high school students. Proceedings of the 6th International?conference on information technology: IoT and Smart City, 70-76. https://doi.org/10.1145/3301551.3301580 

  2. Barana, A., Marchisio, M., & Roman, F. (2023). Fostering Problem Solving and Critical Thinking in Mathematics through?Generative Artificial Intelligence. International Association for Development of the Information Society. 

  3. Bernacki, M. L., & Walkington, C. (2018). The role of situational interest in personalized learning. Journal of Educational?Psychology, 110(6), 864-881. 

  4. Borba, M. C. (2021). The future of mathematics education since COVID-19: Humans-with-media or humans-with-nonliving-things. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 108(1), 385-400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10043-2 

  5. Bray, A., & Tangney, B. (2017). Technology usage in mathematics education research-A systematic review of recent?trends. Computers & Education, 114, 255-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.004 

  6. Bringula, R. P., Fosgate Jr, I. C. O., Garcia, N. P. R., & Yorobe, J. L. M. (2018). Effects of pedagogical agents on students'?mathematics performance: A comparison between two versions. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(5),?701-722. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117722494 

  7. Cabestrero, R., Quiros, P., Santos, O. C., Salmeron-Majadas, S., Uria-Rivas, R., Boticario, J. G., ... & Ferri, F. J. (2018).?Some insights into the impact of affective information when delivering feedback to students. Behaviour & Information?Technology, 37(12), 1252-1263. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1499803 

  8. Casler-Failing, S. (2021). Learning to teach mathematics with robots: Developing the 'T' in technological pedagogical content knowledge. Research in Learning Technology, 29. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v29.2555 

  9. Chang, H., & Nam, J. (2021). The use of Artificial Intelligence in elementary mathematics education-Focusing on the math?class support system 'Knock-knock! math expedition'. The Journal of Korea Elementary Education, 31(Supplement),?105-123. http://dx.doi.org/10.20972/Kjee.31.S.202101.S105 

  10. Choi, I. (2022). Exploring teaching and learning methods using Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the mathematics classroom:?Focusing on the development of middle school statistic scenarios. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics, 25(2),?149-174. https://dx-doi-org.libproxy.snu.ac.kr/10.30807/ksms.2022.25.2.003 

  11. Choi, J. (2021). Artificial Intelligence (AI) research trends in mathematics education. The Journal of Curriculum and Instruction Studies, 14(2), 1-14. 

  12. Chounta, I. A., Bardone, E., Raudsep, A., & Pedaste, M. (2022). Exploring teachers' perceptions of Artificial Intelligence as?a tool to support their practice in Estonian K-12 education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education,?32(3), 725-755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00243-5 

  13. Cook, D. J., Mulrow, C. D., & Haynes, R. B. (1997). Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions.?Annals of Internal Medicine, 126(5), 376-380. 

  14. Cung, B., Xu, D., Eichhorn, S., & Warschauer, M. (2019). Getting academically underprepared students ready through?college developmental education: Does the course delivery format matter?. American Journal of Distance Education,?33(3), 178-194. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2019.1582404 

  15. del Olmo-Munoz, J., Gonzalez-Calero, J. A., Diago, P. D., Arnau, D., & Arevalillo-Herraez, M. (2023). Intelligent tutoring?systems for word problem solving in COVID-19 days: Could they have been (part of) the solution?. ZDM-Mathematics?Education, 55(1), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01396-w 

  16. Ferro, L. S., Sapio, F., Terracina, A., Temperini, M., & Mecella, M. (2021). Gea2: A serious game for technology-enhanced?learning in STEM. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 14(6), 723-739. 

  17. Fissore, C., Floris, F., Marchisio, M., & Sacchet, M. (2022). Didactic activities on Artificial Intelligence: the perspective of?stem teachers. Proceedings of the 19th international conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in the Digital?Age (CELDA 2022, pp. 11-18). IADIS press. 

  18. Forsstrom, S. E., & Afdal, G. (2020). Learning mathematics through activities with robots. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 6(1), 30-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-019-00057-0 

  19. Forsstrom, S. E., & Kaufmann, O. T. (2018). A literature review exploring the use of programming in mathematics education. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 17(12), 18-32. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.17.12.2 

  20. Gillespie, J., Winn, K., Faber, M., & Hunt, J. (2022). Implementation of a Mathematics Formative Assessment Online Tool?Before and During Remote Learning. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, 168-173. Springer?International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11647-6_29 

  21. Gonzalez-Calero, J. A., Arnau, D., Puig, L., & Arevalillo-Herraez, M. (2015). Intensive scaffolding in an intelligent tutoring?system for the learning of algebraic word problem solving. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(6), 1189-1200.?https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12183 

  22. Graesser, A. C. (2016). Conversations with AutoTutor help students learn. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in?Education, 26, 124-132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-015-0086-4 

  23. Grawemeyer, B., Mavrikis, M., Holmes, W., Gutierrez-Santos, S., Wiedmann, M., & Rummel, N. (2017). Affective learning:?Improving engagement and enhancing learning with affect-aware feedback. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 27, 119-158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-017-9188-z 

  24. Guliherme, A. (2017). AI and Education: The importance of teacher and student relations. AI and Society, 32(1), 1-8.?https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-0693-8 

  25. Gulz, A., Londos, L., & Haake, M. (2020). Preschoolers' understanding of a teachable agent-based game in early mathematics as reflected in their gaze behaviors-an experimental study. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in?Education, 30, 38-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-020-00193-4 

  26. Hamim, T., Benabbou, F., & Sael, N. (2022). Student profile modeling using boosting algorithms. International Journal of?Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT), 17(5), 1-13. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJWLTT.20220901.oa4 

  27. Han, W., Kim, E., & Lee, S. (2021). Analysis of elementary and middle school teachers' perceptions of the use of AI in instructional design. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 21(24), 859-875. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2021.21.24.859 

  28. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and?learning. The Center for Curriculum Redesign. 

  29. Hong, S., Kim, H., & Park, Y. (2021). Exploring the potentials of AI integration into K-12 education. Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media, 27(3), 875-898. http://dx.doi.org/10.15833/KAFEIAM.27.3.875 

  30. How, M. L., & Hung, W. L. D. (2019). Educing AI-thinking in science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics?(STEAM) education. Education Sciences, 9(3), 184. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030184 

  31. Huang, X., Craig, S. D., Xie, J., Graesser, A., & Hu, X. (2016). Intelligent tutoring systems work as a math gap reducer in 6th grade after-school program. Learning and Individual Differences, 47, 258-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.01.012 

  32. Hwang, G. J., & Tu, Y. F. (2021). Roles and research trends of Artificial Intelligence in mathematics education: A bibliometric mapping analysis and systematic review. Mathematics, 9(6), 584. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9060584 

  33. Jia, J., Li, S., Miao, Y., & Li, J. (2023). The effects of personalised mathematic instruction supported by an intelligent?tutoring system during the COVID-19 epidemic and the post-epidemic era. International Journal of Innovation and?Learning, 33(3), 330-343. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIL.2023.130099 

  34. Jia, J., Wang, T., Zhang, Y., & Wang, G. (2024). The comparison of general tips for mathematical problem solving generated by generative AI with those generated by human teachers. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 44(1), 8-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2023.2286920 

  35. Kautzmann, T. R., & Jaques, P. A. (2019). Effects of adaptive training on metacognitive knowledge monitoring ability in?computer-based learning. Computers & Education, 129, 92-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.017 

  36. Kim, C., Jeon, Y. (2021). The core concepts of mathematics for AI and an analysis of mathematical contents in the textbook. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 24(4), 391-405. http://doi.org/10.30807/ksms.2021.24.4.004 

  37. Kim, H. K., Park, C., Jeong, S., & Ko, H. (2018). A view on complementary relation of human teacher and AI teacher in future education. Journal of Education & Culture, 24(6), 189-207. https://doi.org/10.24159/joec.2018.24.6.189 

  38. Kim, J. (2023). Leading teachers' perspective on teacher-AI collaboration in education. Education and Information Technologies, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12109-5 

  39. Kim, J., Kwon, M., & Pang, J. (2023). Elementary school teachers' perceptions of using Artificial Intelligence in mathematics education. Education of Primary School Mathematics, 26(4), 299-316. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmec.2023.26.4.299 

  40. Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. M. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering.?Technical Report EBSE 2007-001, Keele University and Durham University Joint Report. 

  41. Ko, H. K. (2020). A study on development of school mathematics contents for Artificial Intelligence (AI) capability. Journal?of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 23(2), 223-237. https://doi.org/10.30807/ksms.2020.23.2.003 

  42. Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage publications. 

  43. Ku, N., & Choi, I. (2022). An analysis of the textbook: Focusing on forecast and optimization. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 32(2), 125-147. http://doi.org/10.29275/jerm.2022.32.2.125 

  44. Kwon, O. N., Lee, K., Oh S. J., & Park, J. S. (2021). An analysis of 'Related Learning Elements' reflected in textbooks. Communications of Mathematical Education, 35(4), 445-473. http://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2021.35.4.445 

  45. Levy, B., Hershkovitz, A., Tabach, M., Cohen, A., Segal, A., & Gal, K. (2023). Personalization in graphically rich e-Learning environments for K-6 Mathematics. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 16(3), 364-376. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2023.3263520 

  46. Lim, M., Kim, H., Nam, J., & Hong, O. (2021). Exploring the application of elementary mathematics supporting system?using Artificial Intelligence in teaching and learning. School Mathematics, 23(2), 251-270. https://doi.org/10.29275/sm.2021.06.23.2.251 

  47. Lim, W., & Park, M. (2021). AI-based mathematics education: A review of issues in international research. Journal of?Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 21(14), 621-635. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2021.21.14.621 

  48. Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410 

  49. Lopez-Caudana, E., Ramirez-Montoya, M. S., Martinez-Perez, S., & Rodriguez-Abitia, G. (2020). Using robotics to enhance active learning in mathematics: A multi-scenario study. Mathematics, 8(12), 2163. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8122163 

  50. Luckin, R., & Holmes, W. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. UCL Knowledge Lab. 

  51. Luzano, J. F. P. (2024). Assessment in mathematics education in the sphere of Artificial Intelligence: A systematic review?on its threats and opportunities. Assessment, 8(2), 100-104. 

  52. Mengist, W., Soromessa, T., & Legese, G. (2020). Method for conducting systematic literature review and meta-analysis?for environmental science research. MethodsX, 7, 100777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.100777 

  53. Ministry of Education (2021). Announcing the main points of the 2022 revision curriculum. Ministry of Education, 2021.11.24. 

  54. Ministry of Education (2022). Mathematics curriculum. proclamation of the ministry of education # 2022-33 [Annex 8].?Ministry of Education. 

  55. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group*, T. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic?reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264-269. 

  56. Nam, B. H., & Bai, Q. (2023). ChatGPT and its ethical implications for STEM research and higher education: A media discourse analysis. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), 66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00452-5 

  57. Ning, Y., Zhang, C., Xu, B., Zhou, Y., & Wijaya, T. T. (2024). Teachers' AI-TPACK: Exploring the relationship between?knowledge elements. Sustainability, 16(3), 978. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16030978 

  58. Nurwahid, M., & Ashar, S. (2024). A literature review: The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in mathematics learning. Proceeding International Conference on Religion, Science and Education, 3, 337-344. Retrieved from https://sunankalijaga.org/prosiding/index.php/icrse/article/view/1254 

  59. Pai, K. C., Kuo, B. C., Liao, C. H., & Liu, Y. M. (2021). An application of Chinese dialogue-based intelligent tutoring system?in remedial instruction for mathematics learning. Educational Psychology, 41(2), 137-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2020.1731427 

  60. Park, C. J., Hyun, J. S. (2022). Review on teachers' digital competency based on digital technology integration model for?2022 revised curriculum. The Korean Association of Computer Education, 25(1), 17-27. https://doi.org/10.32431/kace.2022.25.1.002 

  61. Park, M. (2020). The trends of using Artificial Intelligence in mathematics education. The Journal of Korea elementary?education, 31, 91-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.20972/Kjee.31.S.202008.S91 

  62. Patel, N., Nagpal, P., Shah, T., Sharma, A., Malvi, S., & Lomas, D. (2023). Improving mathematics assessment readability:?Do large language models help?. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 39(3), 804-822. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12776 

  63. Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2008). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. John Wiley & Sons. 

  64. Pham, H., Nong, D., Simshauser, P., Nguyen, G. H., & Duong, K. T. (2024). Artificial intelligence (AI) development in?the Vietnam's energy and economic systems: A critical review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140692 

  65. Phillips, A., Pane, J. F., Reumann-Moore, R., & Shenbanjo, O. (2020). Implementing an adaptive intelligent tutoring system as an instructional supplement. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 1409-1437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09745-w 

  66. Pratikno, P., & Lay, C. (2017). From populism to democratic polity: Problems and challenges in Surakarta, Indonesia. PCD?Journal, 3(1-2), 33-62. https://doi.org/10.22146/pcd.25740 

  67. Rajendran, R., Iyer, S., & Murthy, S. (2018). Personalized affective feedback to address students' frustration in ITS. IEEE?Transactions on Learning Technologies, 12(1), 87-97. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2018.2807447 

  68. Reinhold, F., Hoch, S., Werner, B., Richter-Gebert, J., & Reiss, K. (2020). Learning fractions with and without educational?technology: What matters for high-achieving and low-achieving students?. Learning and Instruction, 65, 101264.?https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101264 

  69. Saputra, H., Sumitra, I., Hirawan, D, Lesmana, R., & Soegoto, E. (2023). Smart urban farming application: UV light in hydroponic installations. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 18(2), 1007-1018. 

  70. Shakya, A., Rus, V., & Venugopal, D. (2023). Scalable and equitable math problem solving strategy prediction in big educational data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.03892. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2308.03892 

  71. Shin, D. (2020a). Artificial intelligence in primary and secondary education: A systematic review. Journal of Educational?Research in Mathematics, 30(3), 531-552. https://doi.org/10.29275/jerm.2020.08.30.3.531 

  72. Shin, D. (2020b). An analysis prospective mathematics teachers' perception on the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in?mathematics education. Communications of Mathematical Education, 34(3), 215-234. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2020.34.3.215 

  73. Sim, Y., Kim, J., Kwon, M. (2020). Secondary mathematics teachers' perceptions on Artificial Intelligence (AI) for math?and math for Artificial Intelligence (AI). Communications of Mathematical Education, 37(2), 159-181. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2023.37.2.159 

  74. Son, T. (2023). Preservice teacher's understanding of the intention to use the artificial intelligence program 'Knock-Knock!?Mathematics Expedition' in mathematics lesson: Focusing on self-efficacy, artificial intelligence anxiety, and technology acceptance model. The Mathematics Education, 62(3), 401-416. https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2023.62.3.401 

  75. Suharmawan, W. (2023). Pemanfaatan Chat GPT dalam dunia pendidikan. Journal Educational Research and Development,?7(2), 158-166. https://doi.org/10.31537/ej.v7i2.1248 

  76. Tejawiani, I., Sucahyo, N., Usanto, U., & Sopian, A. (2023). Peran Artificial Intelligence Terhadap Peningkatan Kreativitas?Siswa Dengan Menerapkan Proyek Penguatan Profil Pelajar Pancasila. JMM (Jurnal Masyarakat Mandiri), 7(4), 3578-3592. 

  77. Tuomi, I. (2020). Research for CULT Committee-The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in education. European Parliament,?Directorate-General for Internal Policies, 2-6. Retrieved from https://web.cs.ucdavis.edu/~koehl/Teaching/ECS188/PDF_files/AI_Education_EU.pdf 

  78. Urrutia, F., & Araya, R. (2024). Who's the best detective? Large language models vs. traditional machine learning in detecting incoherent fourth grade math answers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 61(8), 187-218. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331231191174 

  79. Vuorikari Rina, R., Kluzer, S., & Punie, Y. (2022). DigComp 2.2: The digital competence framework for citizens-with new?examples of knowledge, skills and attitudes (No. JRC128415). Joint Research Centre (Seville site). 

  80. Wardat, Y., Tashtoush, M. A., AlAli, R., & Jarrah, A. M. (2023). ChatGPT: A revolutionary tool for teaching and learning mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(7), em2286. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13272 

  81. Wu, H. M., Kuo, B. C., & Wang, S. C. (2017). Computerized dynamic adaptive tests with immediately individualized feedback for primary school mathematics learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 61-72. 

  82. Wu, T. T., Lee, H. Y., Wang, W. S., Lin, C. J., & Huang, Y. M. (2023). Leveraging computer vision for adaptive learning in?STEM education: Effect of engagement and self-efficacy. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher?Education, 20(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00422-5 

  83. Yoon, J., Park, S., & Kwon, O. N. (2023). ChatGPT-flipped mathematics class case study: Focused on learners' engagement. Journal of Educational Technology, 39(4), 1011-1047. http://dx.doi.org/10.17232/KSET.39.4.1011 

  84. Zafrullah, Z., Hakim, M. L., & Angga, M. (2023). ChatGPT open AI: Analysis of mathematics education students learning?interest. Journal of Technology Global, 1(01), 1-10. 

  85. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marin, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on Artificial Intelligence applications in higher education-where are the educators?. International Journal of Educational Technology in?Higher Education, 16(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0 

  86. Zhang, Y., Li, Y., Cui, L., Cai, D., Liu, L., Fu, T., ... & Shi, S. (2023). Siren's song in the AI ocean: A survey on hallucination?in large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.01219. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.01219 

저자의 다른 논문 :

활용도 분석정보

상세보기
다운로드
내보내기

활용도 Top5 논문

해당 논문의 주제분야에서 활용도가 높은 상위 5개 콘텐츠를 보여줍니다.
더보기 버튼을 클릭하시면 더 많은 관련자료를 살펴볼 수 있습니다.

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

GOLD

오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로