$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

어플리케이션 기반 생물 관찰 기록 학습이 초등학생들의 과학 관련 태도에 미치는 영향
Analyses of Changes in Elementary School Students' Science-Related Attitudes through App-Based Learning of Observing and Recording Living Things 원문보기

초등과학교육 = Journal of Korean elementary science education, v.39 no.3, 2020년, pp.307 - 322  

박형민 (서울난향초등학교)

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

This study analyzed the effects of 'app-based learning of observing and recording living things' on elementary school students' science-related attitudes. Samples of the study were composed of 24 sixth-grade students attending the science club of N elementary school in Seoul, Korea. The learning was...

주제어

#elementary science education   #biology education   #observing and recording living things   #smart learning   #science-related attitudes  

표/그림 (9)

질의응답

핵심어 질문 논문에서 추출한 답변
어플리케이션이라고 불리는 소프트웨어를 스마트폰에 설치하면 구현할 수 있는 것은? 스마트폰의 등장은 인간의 삶에 많은 변화를 가져왔다. 어플리케이션이라고 불리는 소프트웨어를 스마트폰에 설치하면 네비게이션, 워드프로세서, 동영상 편집, 은행 업무 등의 다양한 기능들을 작고 휴대가 간편한 스마트폰 안에서 모두 구현할 수 있다. 이처럼 사회 여러 분야에서 어플리케이션의 활용도는 점점 높아지고 있고, 관련 기술들은 지속적으로 발전되고 있다(Jang et al.
과학 교과를 처음으로 접하는 초등학생들에게 관찰 능력을 신장시킬 수 있는 활동은 매우 중요한데 이러한 관찰 능력을 신장시킬 수 있는 방법 중 하나는? 따라서 과학 교과를 처음으로 접하는 초등학생들에게 관찰 능력을 신장시킬 수 있는 활동은 매우 중요하다. 관찰 능력을 신장시킬 수 있는 방법 중 하나는 관찰일지를 작성하는 것이다. 관찰일지의 작성은 생물 및 자연현상을 연구하는 과학자들에게도 가장 기본이 되는 활동이다(Canfield, 2011).
한국의 학생들 대부분은 스마트기기를 어떻게 활용하고 있는가? 구체적으로 PISA 검사 문항 하나의 결과를 살펴보면, 한국의 학생들이 스마트 기기에 학습용 어플리케이션을 다운받는 비율은 31개 국가 중 29위로 최하위권이었다(Kim, 2017). 한국의 학생들 대부분은 스마트기기를 교육목적으로 활용하기보다는 메신저·게임 등의 여가활동을 위한 도구로 활용하고 있다(Park, 2019). 또한, 이미 개발된 스마트교육용 어플리케이션도 학생들의 교육을 위해 잘 설계되었다고 보기 어렵다(Hirsh-Pasek et al.
질의응답 정보가 도움이 되었나요?

참고문헌 (52)

  1. Akamai (2017). Akamai's state of the Internet: Q1 2017 report. Cambridge, MT: Akamai. 

  2. Amoly, E., Dadvand, P., Forns, J., Lopez-Vicente, M., Basagana, X., Julvez, J., ... & Sunyer, J. (2014). Green and blue spaces and behavioral development in Barcelona schoolchildren: The BREATHE project. Environmental Health Perspectives, 122(12), 1351-1358. 

    상세보기 crossref

  3. Anderson, J. G. (2013). Deep things out of darkness: A history of natural history. Berkeley: Univ of California Press. 

  4. Bae, J., Lee, H. & So, K. (2013). Observation abilities and observation types of plants based on elementary school students’ cognitive style. Biology Education, 41(2), 225-238. 

    crossref

  5. Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A. W. & Feder, M. A. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places and pursuits. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. 

  6. Bixler, R. D., Carlisle, C. L., Hammltt, W. E. & Floyd, M. F. (1994). Observed fears and discomforts among urban students on field trips to wildland areas. The Journal of Environmental Education, 26(1), 24-33. 

    상세보기 crossref

  7. Brossard, D., Lewenstein, B. & Bonney, R. (2005). Scientific knowledge and attitude change: The impact of a citizen science project. International Journal of Science Education, 27(9), 1099-1121. 

    상세보기 crossref

  8. Canfield, M. R. (2011). Field notes on science & nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 

  9. Cho, E. & Choi, Y. (2017). The development and application of the observational learning program to create scientific questions in elementary science class. Biology Education, 45(1), 148-158. 

    상세보기 crossref

  10. Choi, M. (2019). A study on the interactivity of smart LMS in a university class. Journal of Digital Convertgence, 17(3), 395-404. 

  11. Cullen, D. (1998). Scientific literacy from citizen science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Department of Communication. 

  12. Dillon, J., Rickinson, M., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Choi, M. Y., Sanders, D. & Benefield, P. (2006). The value of outdoor learning: Evidence from research in the UK and elsewhere. School Science Review, 87(320), 107. 

    상세보기

  13. Eagleman, D. & Brandt, A. (2017). The runaway species: How human creativity remakes the world. London: Catapult. 

  14. Fiennes, C., Oliver, E., Dickson, K., Escobar, D., Romans, A. & Oliver, S. (2015). The existing evidence-base about the effectiveness of outdoor learning. London: Institute of Outdoor Learning. 

  15. Fiskum, T. A. & Jacobsen, K. (2013). Outdoor education gives fewer demands for action regulation and an increased variability of affordances. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 13(1), 76-99. 

    상세보기 crossref

  16. Fraser, B. J. (1978). Development of a test of sciencerelated attitudes, Science Education, 62(4), 509-515. 

    상세보기 crossref

  17. George, R. & Kaplan, D. (1998). A structural model of parent and teacher influences on science attitudes of eighth graders: Evidence from NELS: 88. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 82, 93-109. 

  18. Gilbert, S. W. (1991). Model building and a definition of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(1), 73-79. 

    상세보기 crossref

  19. Han, M., Kim, Y. & Lee, C. (2017). Analysis of news regarding new southeastern airport using text mining techniques. Smart Media Journal, 6(1), 47-53. 

  20. Hiniker, A., Sobel, K., Hong, S., Suh, H., Kim, D. & Kientz, J. A. (2015). Touchscreen prompts for preschoolers: Designing developmentally appropriate techniques for teaching young children to perform gestures. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (pp. 109-118), ACM, New York. 

  21. Hirsh-Pasek, K., Zosh, J. M., Golinkoff, R. M., Gray, J. H., Robb, M. B. & Kaufman, J. (2015). Putting education in "educational" apps lessons from the science of learning, Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(1), 3-34. 

    상세보기 crossref

  22. Jang, E., Park, Y. & Lim, G. (2012). Research on factors effecting on learners’ satisfaction and purchasing intention of educational applications. Journal of Korea Contents Association, 12(8), 471-483. 

  23. Ju, E. & Kim, J. (2010). An analysis of ecological contents in elementary science textbooks in terms of ecological education. Biology Education, 38(1), 138-154. 

    crossref

  24. KERIS. (2018). 2017 Educational technology survey on elementary and secondary school education [2017년 초？중등학교 교육정보화 실태조사]. Deagu: KERIS. 

  25. Kovalik, S. J. & Olsen, K. D. (1994). Kid's eye view of science: A teacher's handbook for implementing an integrated thematic approach to teaching science, K-6. Kent: Center for the Future of Public Education. 

  26. Kim, E. & Lim, C. (2003). A survey on science field study for elementary school science in 7th Korean school curriculum. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 22(2), 173-180. 

  27. Kim, J. & Kim, J. (2014). The changes of attitude related to science of students in the high school science club through the creative-experience activity of science field. Journal of Science Education, 38(3), 471-489. 

    원문보기 상세보기 crossref

  28. Kim, K. (2017). A study on ICT usability and availability of between Korean students and OECD students: Focus on PISA 2015. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 21(3), 361-370. 

    원문보기 상세보기 crossref

  29. Kim, K. (2020). Personalized design applied mobile app. U.I. design implementation based on A.I.. Doctoral dissertation, Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea. 

  30. Kim, M., Kwon, Y., Lee, I. & Byeon, J. (2013). Analysis of elementary school students’ observation knowledge generation by the strategies of observing activity on living things. Biology Education, 41(4), 657-674. 

    crossref

  31. Kim, Y., Oh, Y. & Kim, M. (2012). A study on the management for the creative activity education. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 20(2), 285-304. 

  32. Kyunghyang Shinmun. (2019). "8000000 birds were killed in crashing into soundproofing wall per 1 year"-plaid sheet paper can be used to prevent collisions["방음벽에 충돌한 멧새, 움직이지 못하다가…" 연 800만마리 희생？격자무늬 시트지로 예방 가능]. Retrieved March 31, 2020. from http://news.khan.co.kr/kh_news/khan_art_view.html?artid201911142054005&code610103 

  33. Lee, S. (2020). Exploring the direction for improvement of elementary and middle school creative experiential activities: Focusing on the problem of overlap between the four areas. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 20(12), 897-915. 

  34. Lindemann-Matthies, P. (2006). Investigating nature on the way to school: Responses to an educational programme by teachers and their pupils. International Journal of Science Education, 28(8), 895-918. 

    상세보기 crossref

  35. Lim, B., Sung, E. & Leem, J. (2013). What is the concept of smart eduction and the typology of smart education contents?. Journal of Educational Technology, 29(3), 459-489. 

    상세보기 crossref

  36. Lim, C. & Park, H. (2017). A validation study of retrospective pre-post test in the affective domain in science learning: For scientifically gifted elementary students. Elementary Science Education, 36(3), 219-226. 

  37. Looi, C. K., Zhang, B., Chen, W., Seow, P., Chia, G., Norris, C. & Soloway, E. (2011). 1:1 mobile inquiry learning experience for primary science students: A study of learning effectiveness. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(3), 269-287. 

    상세보기 crossref

  38. Louv, R. (2008). Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin Books. 

  39. Marino, L., Lilienfeld, S. O., Malamud, R., Nobis, N. & Broglio, R. (2010). Do zoos and aquariums promote attitude change in visitors? A critical evaluation of the American zoo and aquarium study. Society & Animals, 18(2), 126-138. 

    상세보기 crossref

  40. Ministry of Education. (2017). Explanation of 2015 revised curriculum 'creative experiential activities' [2015 개정교육과정 창의적 체험활동 해설]. Seoul: Ministry of Education. 

  41. Ministry of Education. (2019). 5-2 teacher's guides for science [과학 5-2 교사용 지도서]. Seoul: Visang. 

  42. Moomaw, S. (2013). Teaching STEM in the early years: Activities for integrating science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. St. Paul, MN: Redleaf Press. 

  43. National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. 

  44. NATURING Inc. (2019). How to use NATURING. Retrieved March 31, 2020. from https://www.naturing.net/info/about 

  45. Papadakis, S. & Kalogiannakis, M. (2017). Mobile educational applications for children: What educators and parents need to know. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 11(3), 256-277. 

    상세보기 crossref

  46. Park, G. (2015). The effects of science teaching-learning enhancing observation activities on the science process skills and scientific attitudes of elementary school students. Master's thesis, Busan national university of education, Seoul, South Korea. 

  47. Park, J. (2019). Recognition of smartphone dependence of adolescents at risk of smartphone addiction. Journal of The Korean Data Analysis Society, 21(4), 2095-2105. 

    상세보기 crossref

  48. Pratt, C. C., McGuigan, W. M. & Katzev, A. R. (2000). Measuring program outcomes: Using retrospective pretest methodology. American Journal of Evaluation, 21(3), 341-349. 

    상세보기 crossref

  49. Rossman, G. B. & Wilson, B. L. (1994). Numbers and words revisited: Being "shamelessly eclectic". Quality and Quantity, 28(3), 315-327. 

    상세보기 crossref

  50. Schwandt, T. A. (2001). Dictionary of qualitative inquiry (2nd ed.). CA: Sage. 

  51. Wals, A. E. (1994). Nobody planted it, it just grew! Young adolescents' perceptions and experiences of nature in the context of urban environmental education. Children's Environments, 177-193. 

  52. Zhang, Y., Kuo, C. & Yu, D. (2018). A study on trend analysis and developmental potentiality in the educational applications for children. Proceeding of Conference on Korea Society of IT Services, 2018, 362-366. 

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

FREE

Free Access. 출판사/학술단체 등이 허락한 무료 공개 사이트를 통해 자유로운 이용이 가능한 논문

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로