[논문]빛의 굴절에 대한 초등예비교사의 개념이해와 지도계획의 어려움 분석

이지원

doi:10.14697/jkase.2021.41.1.11

빛의 굴절에 대한 초등예비교사의 개념이해와 지도계획의 어려움 분석
Analysis of Elementary Pre-Service Teacher's Difficulties in Conceptual Understanding and Instructional Planning of Light Refraction 원문보기

한국과학교육학회지 = Journal of the Korean association for science education, v.41 no.1, 2021년, pp.11 - 18

초록
AI-Helper

이 연구는 초등예비교사가 빛의 굴절 단원의 교사용 지도서를 읽을 때 생성한 질문을 분석함으로써 개념이해에 있어서의 어려움과 지도계획을 세울 때의 어려움에 어떤 것이 있는지를 분석하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 2015 개정 교육과정 6학년 1학기 '빛과 렌즈' 단원의 지도서를 읽고 초등예비교사 283명이 생성한 의미있는 질문은 총 592개였고 이 중 물리 개념이해를 위한 질문은 총 306개, 교육학적 질문은 총 286개였다. 분석 결과, 초등예비교사는 물리 개념이해 측면에서 굴절이 일어나는 원인, 빛을 산란시켜야 하는 이유, 볼록렌즈의 초점거리에 따른 상의 변화 원인 등 교과서에 제시된 현상이 일어난 '원인'의 개념 이해에 어려움을 가지고 있었다. 지도계획 측면에서는 개념의 설명방법에 대한 질문, 즉 초등학생에게 개념에 대한 설명을 하지 못하고 현상만을 지도하여야 하는 것에 대한 질문, 특정 개념에 대한 구체적인 설명방법, 실험 방법 등에 대한 질문 그 뒤를 이었다. 교사용 지도서에는 교사들의 개념이해를 돕기 위한 여러 가지 설명들과 보충자료가 포함되어 있음에도 불구하고 일부 개념에 대해서는 지도서를 읽고서도 의문이 해결되지 않는 초등예비교사가 많이 있다는 것을 알 수 있다. 질문의 빈도가 높은 개념에 대해서는 좀 더 알기 쉽게 지도서를 작성할 필요가 있다. 지도계획에 있어서는 교수법과 실험방법에 대한 질문이 많았기 때문에 교사용 지도서에서 개념의 설명방법에 대한 예시와 구체적 실험방법을 좀 더 제공할 필요가 있다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper

The purpose of this study is to analyze the questions generated by elementary school pre-service teachers when reading the teacher's guide for the refraction of light, and to analyze the difficulties in understanding the concept and in making instructional plans. A total of 592 meaningful questions were generated by 283 elementary school pre-service teachers after reading the teacher's guide of 'light and lens' unit in the 6th grade of the 2015 revised curriculum. Of these, 306 questions are for understanding the concept of physics and 286 are pedagogical questions. As a result of the analysis, in terms of understanding the concept of physics, the elementary school pre-service teachers encounter difficulties in understanding the concept of the 'cause' of the phenomenon suggested in the textbook, such as the cause of refraction, the reason for scattering light, and the cause of the image change depending on the focal length of the convex lens. In terms of instructional planning, it was followed by questions about how to explain concepts, questions about not being able to explain concepts to elementary school students and having to teach only phenomena, specific explanation methods for specific concepts, and experimental methods. Although the teacher's guide contains various explanations and supplementary materials to help teachers understand the concept, it can be seen that there are many elementary pre-service teachers who cannot answer questions about some concepts even after reading the guide. For concepts with a high frequency of questions, it is necessary to prepare a tutorial that is more understandable. In the instructional plan, there were many questions about teaching methods and experimental methods, so it is necessary to provide more examples and specific experimental methods for explaining concepts in the teacher's guide.

주제어

표/그림 (6)

표 Table 1. Major of participants
표 Table 2. Structure of the 'light and lens' unit
그림 Figure 1. Interactive reading by exchanging questions and answers among users on the contents of a teacher's guide in an online annotation system
표 Table 3. Top 10 in the frequency of keywords presented in the concept questions
표 Table 4. Main questions with a high frequency of keywords combination
$Table 5. Frequency and examples of questions about pedagogical content knowledge in the light refraction unit$ 표 Table 5. Frequency and examples of questions about pedagogical content knowledge in the light refraction unit

참고문헌 (21)

Akerson, V. L., Morrison, J. A., & McDuffie, A. R. (2006). One course is not enough: Preservice elementary teachers' retention of improved views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(2), 194-213.

상세보기
Appleton, K. & Kindt, I. (1999). How Do Beginning Elementary Teachers Cope with Science: Development of Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science.
Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is-or might be-the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform?. Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6-14.

상세보기
Czerniak, C., & Chiarelott, L. (1990). Teacher education for effective science instruction-A social cognitive perspective. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(1), 49-58.

상세보기
Graesser, A. C. & Olde, B. A. (2003). How does one know whether a person understands a device? The quality of the questions the person asks when the device breaks down. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(3), 524.

상세보기
Jang, M., Joung, Y. & Kim, H. (2011). The elementary school teachers' conceptions and utilization on the general remarks in the science teacher's guide. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 30(4), 535-552.
Jeon, Y-M. (2006). Understanding American teachers' use of teachers' manuals: Two case studies. The Korean Society for The Study of Teacher Education, 23(3), 5-24.
Kim, G. & Lee, H. (2016). The analysis on question's patterns in elementary school science teacher's guidebooksof 5, 6th grade under the 2009 revised curriculum. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 35(1), 1-12.
Kim, H. & Song, J. (2020). Analysis of Reference Data in Science Guidebooks for Elementary Teachers Developed for 2015 Revised Curriculum -Focusing on Physics Section for the Third-Sixth Grade-. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 39(2), 155-167.
Kim, Y. & Yoo, J. (2019). Exploring elementary teachers' difficulties on teaching science by analyzing questions in an autonomous online teacher community: Focusing on physics questions in indischool. Journal of Korean Association of Science Education, 39(1), 73-88.
Kwak, Y. S. (2011). A Study on Actual Conditions and Ways to Improve Primary School Science Teaching. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 32(4), 422-434.
Kwon, G-P. (2014). An Analysis of Elementary Pre-service Teachers' Understanding of the Illustration of the Straw Reflection Image. Teacher Education Research, 53(4), 815-824.
Kwon, J., Jung, W. & Kim, Y. (2001). Teachers' perception and improvement on the elementary science teacher's guide. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 20(1), 75-89.
Kwon, C., Park, B. (2011). The teacher's recognition and utilization for subject of new science teacher's guide in the elementary school. The Journal of Korea Elementary Education, 21(2), 247-260.
Lee. J. (2018). Collaborative reading comprehension of science textbook via students' knowledge sharing in an online annotation system. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 38(5), 667-680.
Lee, J. E. (2015). Perspectives on traveling according to light source in students, pre- and in-service teachers. Korea National University of Education Master thesis.
Lee, K. H. & Choi, M. Y. (2013). Critical examination of 2009 revised teacher's guide book by an aspect of Pedagogical Content. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 13(6), 667-689.
Oh, P. S. (2011). "Unfillable Cups": Meanings of science classes to elementary school teachers. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 31(2), 271-294.
Otero, J. & Graesser, A. C. (2001). PREG: Elements of a model of question asking. Cognition and Instruction, 19(2), 143-175.

상세보기
Park, S. H. (2001). A qualitative study on investigation of science-related background and experience of elementary inservice teachers in terms of personal self-efficacy about science teaching. The Journal of Korean Teach Education, 18(1), 123-150.
Park, S. H. (2003). Pedagogical content knowledge and predictor variables in science teaching of practicing elementary teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(6), 671-683.

저자의 다른 논문 :

표제어: PCR

동의어: Packet Collision Rate

용어 설명 출처 목록 (6)

용어 설명: PCR은 세균 특이성이 있는 primer를 이용하여 적은 수의 세균이 있을지라도 쉽게 검출할 수 있는 유용한 방법이며, 이를 이용하여 구강 내 치면세균막이나 타액에서 직접 세균을 검출할 수 있게 되었다[8].

내보내기 구분	파일저장 인쇄 메일전송
구성항목	기본정보 상세정보 관리번호, 논문명, 저널/프로시딩명, 저자 , 발행년, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, 발행기관 관리번호, 논문명, 대등논문명, 저자 , 저널/프로시딩명, 발행기관, 발행년, 발행언어, 권, 호, 시작페이지, 끝페이지, ISBN, ISSN, 주제분야, 키워드, 초록(한글), 초록(영문), 저자(소속기관)
저장형식	Text(ASCII format) Excel format RefWorks Direct Export RIS format (for Reference Manager, ProCite, EndNote), Scholar's Aids, Mendeley
메일정보	받는사람 (필수) @ 보내는사람 (선택) @ 제목 내용 KISTI 검색결과 이메일 서비스
안내	총 건의 자료가 검색되었습니다. 다운받으실 자료의 인덱스를 입력하세요. (1-10,000) 검색결과의 순서대로 최대 10,000건 까지 다운로드가 가능합니다. 데이타가 많을 경우 속도가 느려질 수 있습니다.(최대 2~3분 소요) 다운로드 파일은 UTF-8 형태로 저장됩니다. 파일의 내용이 제대로 보이지 않을실 때는 웹브라우저 상단의 보기 -> 인코딩 -> 자동선택 여부를 확인하십시오. ~ Text(ASCII format) Excel format

연합인증