$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

수학 수업에서 예비교사의 인공지능 프로그램 '똑똑! 수학 탐험대' 사용 의도 이해: 자기효능감과 인공지능 불안, 기술수용모델을 중심으로
Preservice teacher's understanding of the intention to use the artificial intelligence program 'Knock-Knock! Mathematics Expedition' in mathematics lesson: Focusing on self-efficacy, artificial intelligence anxiety, and technology acceptance model 원문보기

Journal of the Korean Society of Mathematical Education. Series A. The Mathematical Education, v.62 no.3, 2023년, pp.401 - 416  

손태권 (봉명초등학교)

초록
AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

본 연구는 기술수용모델을 기반으로 예비교사의 자기효능감과 AI 불안이 수학 수업에서 '똑똑! 수학 탐험대'를 사용하려는 의도에 미치는 영향을 구조적으로 살펴보았다. 이를 위해 254명의 예비교사들의 자기효능감, AI 불안, 인지된 사용 용이성, 인지된 유용성, 사용 의도를 변인으로 연구모형을 설정하고 구조방정식으로 변인 간의 구조적 관계와 직·간접효과를 분석하였다. 분석 결과, 자기효능감은 인지된 사용 용이성, 인지된 유용성, 사용 의도에 유의미한 영향을 미쳤으며, AI 불안은 인지된 사용 용이성과 인지된 유용성에 유의미한 영향을 미치지 않았다. 인지된 사용 용이성은 인지된 유용성과 사용 의도에 유의미한 영향을 미쳤으며, 인지된 유용성은 사용 의도에 유의미한 영향을 미쳤다. 이러한 결과를 통해 수학수업에서 예비교사가 '똑똑! 수학 탐험대' 사용을 촉진하기 위한 시사점과 방안을 제안하였다.

Abstract ▼ AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

This study systematically examined the influence of preservice teachers' self-efficacy and AI anxiety, on the intention to use AI programs 'knock-knock! mathematics expedition' in mathematics lessons based on a technology acceptance model. The research model was established with variables including ...

주제어

#예비교사   #수학 수업   #인공지능   #기술수용모델   #자기효능감   #인공지능 불안  

표/그림 (13)

참고문헌 (60)

  1. Ajzen. I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hal. 

  2. Ayanwale, M. A., Sanusi, I. T., Adelana, O. P., Aruleba, K. D., & Oyelere, S. S. (2022). Teachers' readiness and intention to teach artificial？intelligence in schools. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100099 

    상세보기 crossref

  3. Bae, B. (2011). Amos 19 structural equation modeling principle and practice. Cheongram 

  4. Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4(3), 359-373. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1986.4.3.359 

    상세보기 crossref

  5. Barclay, D., Higgins, C., & Thompson, R. (1995). The partial least squares (PLS) approach to casual modeling: Personal computer adoption and use？as an Illustration. Technology Studies, 2(2), 285-309. 

  6. Bentler, P. M. (1989). EQS structural equations program manual. BMDP. 

  7. Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1993). Testing structural equation models. Sage. 

  8. Bourgonjon, J., De Grove, F., De Smet, C., Van Looy, J., Soetaert, R., & Valcke, M. (2013). Acceptance of game-based learning by secondary？school teachers. Computers & Education, 67, 21-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.010 

    상세보기 crossref

  9. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation？models (pp. 136-162). Sage. 

  10. Chang, C. T., Hajiyev, J., & Su, C. R. (2017). Examining the students' behavioral intention to use e-learning in Azerbaijan? The general extended？technology acceptance model for e-learning approach. Computers & Education, 111, 128-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.010 

    상세보기 crossref

  11. Chang, H. & Nam, J. (2021). The use of artificial intelligence in elementary mathematics education -Focusing on the math class support？system "Knock-knock! Math Expedition"-. The Journal of Korea Elementary Education, 31(Supplement), 105-123. http://doi.org/10.20972/kjee.31..202101.105 

    crossref

  12. Chai, C. S., Wang, X., & Xu, C. (2020). An extended theory of planned behavior for the modelling of Chinese secondary school students' intention？to learn artificial intelligence. Mathematics, 8(11), 2089. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8112089 

    상세보기 crossref

  13. Chapman, O. (2002). Belief structure and inservice high school mathematics teacher growth. In G. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Torner (Eds.), Beliefs:？A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 177-193). Kluwer. 

  14. Chiu, T. K. (2017). Introducing electronic textbooks as daily-use technology in schools: A top-down adoption process. British Journal of？Educational Technology, 48(2), 524-537. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12432 

    상세보기 crossref

  15. Chocarro, R., Cortinas, M., & Marcos-Matas, G. (2023). Teachers' attitudes towards chatbots in education: A technology acceptance model？approach considering the effect of social language, bot proactiveness, and users' characteristics. Educational Studies, 49(2), 295-313. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1850426 

    상세보기 crossref

  16. Davis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results [Doctoral？dissertation, MIT Sloan School of Management]. 

  17. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.？https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 

    상세보기 crossref

  18. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A Comparison of two theoretical models.？Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003. 

    상세보기

  19. DeVita, M., Verschaffel, L., & Elen, J. (2012). Acceptance of interactive whiteboards by Italian mathematics teachers. Educational Research, 3(7),？553-565. 

  20. Fearnley, M. R., & Amora, J. T. (2020). Learning management system adoption in higher education using the extended technology acceptance？model. IAFOR Journal of Education, 8(2), 89-106. 

    상세보기

  21. Gavora, P. (2010). Slovak pre-service teacher self-efficacy: Theoretical and research considerations. The New Educational Review, 21(2), 17-30. 

  22. Gong, M., Xu, Y., & Yu, Y. (2004). An enhanced technology acceptance model for web-based learning. Journal of Information Systems Education,？15(4), 365-374. 

    상세보기

  23. Gurer, M. D. (2021). Examining technology acceptance of pre-service mathematics teachers in Turkey: A structural equation modeling approach.？Education and Information Technologies, 26(4), 4709-4729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10493-4 

    상세보기 crossref

  24. Ha, J. G., Page, T., & Thorsteinsson, G. (2011). A study on technophobia and mobile device design. International Journal of Contents, 7(2), 17-25. 

    원문보기 상세보기

  25. Hair, J. F., Black, W., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. Pearson. 

  26. Henson, R. K. (2001). Teacher self efficacy: Substantive implications and measurement dilemmas. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the？Educational, Texas A & M University. 

  27. Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Tsai, C. M., Liu, M. C., & Lee, Y. F. (2022). Exploring teachers' attitudes toward implementing new ICT educational？policies. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(10), 1823-1837. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1752740 

    상세보기 crossref

  28. Hoy, A. W. (2000). Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years of teaching. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American？Educational Research Association Conference, New Orleans, LA. 

  29. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.？Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 

    상세보기 crossref

  30. Ibili, E., Resnyansky, D., & Billinghurst, M. (2019). Applying the technology acceptance model to understand maths teachers' perceptions towards？an augmented reality tutoring system. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 2653-2675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09925-z 

    상세보기 crossref

  31. Johnson, D. G., & Verdicchio, M. (2017). AI anxiety. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(9), 2267-2270. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23867 

    상세보기 crossref

  32. Joo, Y. J., Park, S., & Lim, E. (2018). Factors influencing preservice teachers' intention to use technology: TPACK, teacher self-efficacy, and？technology acceptance model. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 48-59. 

  33. Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications. 

  34. Kramarski, B., & Michalsky, T. (2010). Preparing preservice teachers for self-regulated learning in the context of technological pedagogical content？knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 20(5), 434-447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.05.003 

    상세보기 crossref

  35. Langran, E., Searson, M., Knezek, G., & Christensen, R. (2020, April). AI in teacher education. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher？Education International Conference (pp. 751-756). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). 

  36. Lim, M., Kim, H. M., Nam, J., & Hong, O. (2021). Exploring the application of elementary mathematics supporting system using artificial？intelligence in teaching and learning. School Mathematics, 23(2), 251-270. http://doi.org/10.29275/sm.2021.06.23.2.251 

    crossref

  37. Li, J., & Huang, J. S. (2020). Dimensions of artificial intelligence anxiety based on the integrated fear acquisition theory. Technology in Society, 63, 101410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101410 

    상세보기 crossref

  38. Lin, P., & Van Brummelen, J. (2021, May). Engaging teachers to co-design integrated AI curriculum for K-12 classrooms. In Proceedings of the？2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-12). 

  39. Ministry of Education (2020a). Comprehensive plan for science, mathematics, information, and STEAM education. Ministry of Education 

  40. Ministry of Education (2020b, September 14). Artificial intelligence, into school! Artificial intelligence (AI), introduced as an elementary？math study helper, as an optional course in high school. News from the Ministry of Education. https://www.moe.go.kr/boardCnts/view.do?boardID294&board -Seq81918&lev0&searchTypenull&statusYNW&page5&smoe&m020402&opTypeN 

  41. Moon, S. (2009). Basic concepts and application of structural equation modeling. Hakjisa. 

  42. Mueller, J., Wood, E., Willoughby, T., Ross, C., & Specht, J. (2008). Identifying discriminating variables between teachers who fully integrate？computers and teachers with limited integration. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1523-1537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.02.003 

    상세보기 crossref

  43. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. NCTM. 

  44. Park, M. (2020). Applications and possibilities of artificial intelligence in mathematics education. Communications of Mathematical Education,？34(4), 545-561. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2020.34.4.545 

    원문보기 상세보기 crossref

  45. Rafique, H., Ul Islam, Z., & Shamim, A. (2023). Acceptance of e-learning technology by government school teachers: Application of extended？technology acceptance model. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2164783 

    crossref

  46. Saade, R. G., & Kira, D. (2009). Computer anxiety in e-learning: The effect of computer self-efficacy. Journal of Information Technology Education:？Research, 8(1), 177-191. https://doi.org/10.28945/166 

    상세보기 crossref

  47. Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling？approach to explaining teachers' adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009 

    상세보기 crossref

  48. Segars, A. H., & Grover, V. (1998). Strategic information systems planning success: An investigation of the construct and its measurement. MIS？Quarterly, 22(2), 139-163. 

  49. Seufert, S., Guggemos, J., & Sailer, M. (2021). Technology-related knowledge, skills, and attitudes of pre-and in-service teachers: The current？situation and emerging trends. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, 106552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106552 

    상세보기 crossref

  50. Shin, D. (2020). An analysis prospective mathematics teachers' perception on the use of artificial intelligence(AI) in mathematics education.？Communications of Mathematical Education, 34(3), 215-234. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2020.34.3.215 

    원문보기 상세보기 crossref

  51. Sinclair, J., & Aho, A. (2018). Experts on super innovators: Understanding staff adoption of learning management systems. Higher Education？Research and Development, 37(1), 158-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1342609 

    상세보기 crossref

  52. Teo, T. (2009). Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Computers & Education, 52(2), 302-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.006 

    상세보기 crossref

  53. Teo, T., Milutinovic, V., Zhou, M., & Bankovic, D. (2017). Traditional vs. innovative uses of computers among mathematics pre-service teachers in？Serbia. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(7), 811-827. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1189943 

    상세보기 crossref

  54. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783-805.？https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1 

    상세보기 crossref

  55. Van Vaerenbergh, S., Perez-Suay, A., & Diago, P. D. (2023). Acceptance and intentions of using dynamic geometry software by pre-service primary？school teachers. Education Sciences, 13(7), 661. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070661 

    상세보기 crossref

  56. Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance？model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342-365. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872 

    상세보기 crossref

  57. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451-481. 

    상세보기

  58. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance？and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 157-178. 

  59. Woo, J. (2012). Structural equation model concept and understanding. Hannarae. 

  60. Yim, Y., Ahn, S., Kim, K. M., Kim, J. H., & Hong, O. (2021). The effects of an AI-based class support system on student learning: Focusing on the？case of toc-toc math expedition in Korea. Korean Journal of Elementary Education, 32(4), 61-73. http://doi.org/10.20972/kjee.32.4.202112.61 

    crossref

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

GOLD

오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로