$\require{mediawiki-texvc}$

연합인증

연합인증 가입 기관의 연구자들은 소속기관의 인증정보(ID와 암호)를 이용해 다른 대학, 연구기관, 서비스 공급자의 다양한 온라인 자원과 연구 데이터를 이용할 수 있습니다.

이는 여행자가 자국에서 발행 받은 여권으로 세계 각국을 자유롭게 여행할 수 있는 것과 같습니다.

연합인증으로 이용이 가능한 서비스는 NTIS, DataON, Edison, Kafe, Webinar 등이 있습니다.

한번의 인증절차만으로 연합인증 가입 서비스에 추가 로그인 없이 이용이 가능합니다.

다만, 연합인증을 위해서는 최초 1회만 인증 절차가 필요합니다. (회원이 아닐 경우 회원 가입이 필요합니다.)

연합인증 절차는 다음과 같습니다.

최초이용시에는
ScienceON에 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 로그인 (본인 확인 또는 회원가입) → 서비스 이용

그 이후에는
ScienceON 로그인 → 연합인증 서비스 접속 → 서비스 이용

연합인증을 활용하시면 KISTI가 제공하는 다양한 서비스를 편리하게 이용하실 수 있습니다.

기록의 정보자산화: 각국 국립기록청의 정보자산 관리 동향 분석
Information Assetization of Records: Analysis of Information Asset Management Trends of the National Archives in Each Country 원문보기

한국기록관리학회지 = Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, v.21 no.4, 2021년, pp.45 - 63  

김명훈 (국립 강릉원주대학교)

초록

전자기록 환경을 맞아 기록이 지닌 정보로서의 활용 필요성을 제기하는 논의들이 제기되고 있으며, 이에 ISO 15489:2016에서는 기록을 정보자산 중 하나로 규정하였다. 이러한 정보자산 개념을 수용해 각국 국립기록청에서는 관련 정책 및 지침을 수립해 정보자산 관리를 적극적으로 추진하고 있다. 이에 본고에서는 각국 국립기록청에서 추진 중인 정보자산 관리 정책 및 지침을 분석하고자 한다. 이는 디지털 환경을 맞아 기록의 정보자산화를 위한 세계적 동향을 파악함과 더불어, 향후 우리나라의 제도적 방안 모색을 위한 벤치마킹 요소를 도출하기 위해서이다. 이를 위해 우선 기록관리 분야에서의 정보자산에 대한 개념적 기원을 조사하기 위해 기록관리 국제표준에서의 기록에 대한 정의 및 관련 연구성과들을 분석하였다. 이어 정보자산 관리에 대한 정책 및 지침을 수립해 운영 중인 영국, 뉴질랜드, 호주 국립기록청의 실제 사례들을 조사하였으며, 이를 통해 우리나라의 제도적 방안 모색을 위한 일환으로 해외 사례의 시사점과 함께, 기록과 정보자산의 관계 정립을 위해 보완해야 할 사안들을 제시하였다.

Abstract AI-Helper 아이콘AI-Helper

In the electronic record environment, there are discussions about the necessity of using records as information, and ISO 15489:2016 defines records as one of the information assets. In acceptance of this concept of information assets, the national archives of each country have established related po...

주제어

표/그림 (8)

참고문헌 (57)

  1. Guideline on Information Assets Management, No.321, November 4, 2020. 

  2. Information and Documentation - Records Management - Core Concepts and Vocabulary. KS X ISO 30300:2020. 

  3. Information and Documentation - Records Management - Part 1: Concepts and Principles. KS X ISO 15489:2001. 

  4. Information and Documentation - Records Management - Part 1: Concepts and Principles. KS X ISO 15489:2016. 

  5. Jeong, Ki Ae (2010). A Study on the Implications of the MSR Standards for the Development of Records Management Practice in Korea. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 10(2), 171-192. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2010.10.2.171 

  6. Jun, Bo Bae & Seol, Moon Won (2021). Implementation Plan to Ensure Digital Continuity of University Information Resources. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 21(1), 141-161. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2021.21.1.141 

  7. Public Records Management Act, No.16661, December 3, 2019. 

  8. Seol, Moon Won (2020). Managing Information as Records Asset: Public Records Policies in the Digital Transformation Era. Korean Society of Archival Studies, 63, 5-36. https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2020.63.005 

  9. Acland, G. (1992). Managing the Record rather than the Relic. Archives and Manuscripts, 20(1), 57-63. 

  10. ANZ (2011). Digital Continuity Action Plan: Managing Information for Public Sector Efficiency. Archives New Zealand. 

  11. ANZ (2016). Information and Records Management Standard. Available: https://archives.govt.nz/files/Information%20and%20records%20management%20standard%2016%2FS1 

  12. ANZ (2018). Key Definitions. Available: https://archives.govt.nz/files/Keydefinitions 

  13. ANZ (2020a). Key Obligations: Public Records Act 2005. Available: https://archives.govt.nz/files/Keyobligations-PublicRecordsAct200516%2FF6 

  14. ANZ (2020b). Information Assets. Available: https://archives.govt.nz/manage-information/how-to-manage-your-information/planning-and-strategy/information-ssets/in formation-assets-overview 

  15. ANZ (2020c). Information Assets: Identification and management(17/F23 v1.2). Available: https://archives.govt.nz/files/Informationassets-Identificationandmanagement17%2FF23 

  16. Bearman, D. (1994). Electronic Evidence Strategies for Managing Records in Contemporary Organizations. Pittsburgh: Archives & Museum Informatics. 

  17. Boles, F. & Greene, M. (2001). Confusing the Bun for the Burger: Rehabilitating the Role of Content in the Archival Context. Schweizerische Zeitschrift fur Geschichte, 51, 424-47. Available: https://www.e-periodica.ch/cntmng?pidszg-006%3A2001%3A51%3A%3A89 

  18. Brothman, B. (2002). Afterglow: Conceptions of Records and Evidence in Archival Discourse. Archival Science, 2(3/4), 311-342. 

  19. Ceeney, N. (2008). The Role of a 21st-Century National Archive: The Relevance of the Jenkinsonian Tradition, and a Redefinition for the Information Society. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 29(1), 57-71. 

  20. Clarke, S. (2009). Crowded Out: Records Management and the Web 2.0 Phenomenon. Archives and Manuscripts, 37(1), 118-133. 

  21. Cox, R. J. (2001). Managing Records as Evidence and Information. Westport, Connecticut: Quorum Books. 

  22. Delmas, B. (2001). Archival Science Facing the Information Society. Archival Science, 1(1), 25-37. 

  23. Department of Internal Affairs (2015). Government Enterprise Architecture: Information Asset Catalogue Template Guidelines (Version 2.0). Available: https://snapshot.ict.govt.nz/resources/digital-ict-archive/static/localhost_8000/assets/Guidance-and-Resources/Information-Asset-Catalogue-Template/Information-Asset-Catalogue-Guidelines-v2.0-Approved.pdf 

  24. Dollar, C. M. (1993). Archivists and Records Managers in the Information Age. Archivaria, 36, 37-52. 

  25. Duranti, L. (2001). The Impact of Digital Technology on Archival Science. Archival Science, 1(1), 39-55. 

  26. Eiring, H. L. (2002). The Evolving Information World. Information Management Journal, 36(1), 20-24. 

  27. Ellis, J. & Bustelo, C. (2012). Management Systems for Records. Available: https://www.iso.org/news/2012/01/Ref1524.html 

  28. Hare, C. E. (1998). Records Management in the Next Millennium: Conference Report. Records Management Journal, 8(2), 113-117. 

  29. Healy, S. (2001). ISO 15489 Records Management: Its Development and Significance. Records Management Journal, 11(3), 96-103. 

  30. Henry, L. (1998). Schellenberg in Cyberspace. American Archivist, 16(2), 309-327. 

  31. Hinton, B. (2008). On Records, Information and Knowledge Management Srrategy. Available: https://bradhinton.wordpress.com/2008/08/07/on-records-information-and-knowledge-management-strategy/ 

  32. Klareld, A. S. (2015). Isn't It Information Assets We're Really Talking about?' A Discourse Analysis of a Panel Discussion on Digital Archives. Archives and Records, 36(2), 167-178. 

  33. McLean, J. (2002). Developing and Maintaining an Effective Records Management Programme. ISO Bulletin, 2002(2), 21-25. 

  34. McLeod, J. (2003). Assessing the Impact of ISO 15489: A Preliminary Investigation. Records Management Journal, 13(2), 70-82. 

  35. Myburgh, S. (2002). Strategic Information Management: Understanding a New Reality. Information Management Journal, 36(1), 36-43. 

  36. NAA (2015). Digital Continuity 2020 Policy. Available: https://www.naa.gov.au/information-management/information-management-policies/digital-continuity-2020-policy 

  37. NAA (2017). Information Management Standard for Australian Government. Available: https://www.naa.gov.au/information-management/information-management-standards/information-management-standard-australian-government 

  38. NAA (2020). Conducting an Information Review. Available: https://www.naa.gov.au/information-management/information-governance/conducting-information-review 

  39. NAA (2021a). The Building Trust in the Public Record: Managing Information and Data for Government and Community Policy. NAA. Available: https://www.naa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2021-05/building-trust-in-the-public-record-managing-information-and-data-forgovernment-and-community.pdf 

  40. NAA (2021b). Designing and Maintaining an Information Asset Register. Available: https://www.naa.gov.au/information-management/information-governance/conducting-information-review/designing-andmaintaining-information-asset-register 

  41. New Zealand Government (2020). Public Records Act 2005, Available: https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2005/0040/latest/DLM345537.html 

  42. O'Shea, G. (1996). Keeping Electronic Records: Issues and Strategies(1). Provenance, 1(2). Available: http://www.provenance.ca/1995-2000backissues/vol1/no2/features/erecs1a.htm 

  43. Recordkeeping Innovation (2016). Introducing the Revised International Standard on Records Management, ISO 15489:2016. 

  44. Roberts, D. (1998). The New Australian Records Management Standard. State Records New South Wales. Available: http://www.records.nsw.gov.au/publicsector/rk/sacramento/sacramento.htm 

  45. Shepherd, E. & Yeo, G. (2003). Managing Records: A Handbook of Principles and Practice, London: Facet Publishing. 

  46. Sprehe, J. T. (2005). The Positive Benefits of Electronic Records Management in the Context of Enterprise Content Management. Government Information Quarterly, 22(2), 297-303. 

  47. Sutcliffe, P. (2003). Building the Corporate Memory in the E-environment. Records Management, 13(2), 51-53. 

  48. The Cabinet Office (2018). Guidance on the IAO Role(1.3). Available: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/706951/Guidance_on_th e_IAO_Role_-_May_2018.pdf 

  49. Thibodeau, K. (2009). The Survival of Records (and Records Management) in the Twenty-First Century. Presented at Our Professional Identities in a World Gone Digital" - An International Symposium The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 

  50. TNA (2017a). Managing Digital Continuity. Available: http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/information-management/managing-digital-continuity.pdf 

  51. TNA (2017b). Understanding Digital Continuity. Available: http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/information-management/understanding-digital-continuity.pdf 

  52. TNA (2017c). Identify Information Assets and Business Requirements. Available: https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/information-management/identify-information-assets.pdf 

  53. TNA (2017d). Mapping the Technical Dependencies of Information Assets. Available: https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/information-management/mapping-technical-dependencies.pdf 

  54. Yeo, G. (2007). Concepts of Record (1): Evidence, Information, and Persistent Representations. American Archivist, 70(2), 315-343. 

  55. Yeo, G. (2018). Records, Information and Data: Exploring the Role of Record-keeping in an Information Culture. London: Facet Publishing. 

  56. 渡邊健, 小谷允志, 伊藤?理子, 小根山美鈴, 白川?美, 山田敏史 (2014). 記?管理の?際標準 「ISO 30300」 への期待と 和?試案. 情報管理, 57(5), 315-322. Available: https://doi.org/10.1241/johokanri.57.315 

  57. 中島康比古 (2016). 記?管理の?際標準ISO15489-1の改定について. ア?カイブズ, 61. 

관련 콘텐츠

오픈액세스(OA) 유형

GOLD

오픈액세스 학술지에 출판된 논문

이 논문과 함께 이용한 콘텐츠

저작권 관리 안내
섹션별 컨텐츠 바로가기

AI-Helper ※ AI-Helper는 오픈소스 모델을 사용합니다.

AI-Helper 아이콘
AI-Helper
안녕하세요, AI-Helper입니다. 좌측 "선택된 텍스트"에서 텍스트를 선택하여 요약, 번역, 용어설명을 실행하세요.
※ AI-Helper는 부적절한 답변을 할 수 있습니다.

선택된 텍스트

맨위로